Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of tunnel widening after double-bundle ACL reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tunnel widening using a multi-planar reformation of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) in the orientation of the tunnel. The hypotheses of this study were as follows: (1) tunnel widening would be reduced with the above-mentioned technique, (2) the degree of tunnel widening would be different at the site of the tunnels, and (3) the time interval from surgery to MRI acquisition would affect the magnitude of tunnel widening.

Methods

Forty double-bundle ACL reconstructed patients who underwent postoperative MRI were enrolled in this study. The postoperative MRI was performed at 26.7 ± 7.4 months in terms of time. The tunnel widening was examined using a multi-planar reformation of MRI in the orientation of the tunnel. Site-specific analysis was performed according to the depth (the entrance, mid, and exit portion) and wall (anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral walls). The correlation between MRI and widening was also evaluated.

Results

The mean tunnel widening of the femoral AM (Anteromedial), femoral PL (Posterolateral), tibial AM, and tibial PL in terms of the most widened diameter was 1.9 (25.4), 2.1 (30.8), 2.5 (32.8), and 3.2 mm (44.5%), respectively. The tibial PL tunnel showed significant widening than the other tunnels. At the entrance, tunnel widening occurred mostly, followed by the order of the mid and exit portion. Correlation analysis of the time interval of MRI acquisition and tunnel widening showed little association.

Conclusions

Tunnel widening after a double-bundle ACL reconstruction using an outside-in technique with press-fitting of the graft was acceptable compared to previously published studies. The tibial PL tunnel showed the most widening among the 4 tunnels examined with the tunnel entrance being most widened area.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P, Losco M, Mondanelli N (2007) Single-and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn JH, Park JS, Lee YS, Cho YJ (2007) Femoral bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:1093–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alentorn-Geli E, Samitier G, Alvarez P, Steinbacher G, Cugat R (2010) Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up. Int Orthop 34:747–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumfeld JA, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Hart JA, Miller MD, Barr MS, Hart JM (2008) Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1108–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buelow JU, Siebold R, Ellermann A (2002) A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang CB, Yoo JH, Chung BJ, Seong SC, Kim TK (2010) Oblique femoral tunnel placement can increase risks of short femoral tunnel and cross-pin protrusion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38:1237–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CH, Chang CH, Su CI, Wang KC, Liu HT, Yu CM, Wong CB, Wang IC (2010) Arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with periosteum-enveloping hamstring tendon graft: clinical outcome at 2–7 years. Arthroscopy 26:907–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clatworthy MG, Annear P, Bulow JU, Bartlett RJ (1999) Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:138–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebraheim NA, Liu J, Shafiq Q, Lu J, Pataparla S, Yeasting RA, Woldenberg L (2006) Quantitative analysis of changes in cervical intervertebral foramen size with vertebral translation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E62–E65

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fauno P, Kaalund S (2005) Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 21:1337–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CA, Anderst W, Tashman S, Fu FH (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1418–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gavriilidis I, Motsis EK, Pakos EE, Georgoulis AD, Mitsionis G, Xenakis TA (2008) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee 15:364–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelber PE, Reina F, Torres R, Monllau JC (2010) Effect of femoral tunnel length on the safety of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation using cross-pin technique: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 38:1877–1884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J, Wright G, Brittain J, Beaulieu C (2004) Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:343–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hantes ME, Liantsis AK, Basdekis GK, Karantanas AH, Christel P, Malizos KN (2010) Evaluation of the bone bridge between the bone tunnels after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study. Am J Sports Med 38:1618–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoher J, Moller HD, Fu FH (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:231–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jarvela T, Moisala AS, Paakkala T, Paakkala A (2008) Tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study. Arthroscopy 24:1349–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Anderst W, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2010) Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1427–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD (1997) Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:234–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee WA (2007) Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm sizing and case planning using the TeraRecon aquarius workstation. Vasc Endovascular Surg 41:61–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lind M, Feller J, Webster KE (2009) Bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton or EndoButton continuous loop. Arthroscopy 25:1275–1280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Magee T (2007) Three-tesla MR imaging of the knee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:125–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller TT (2009) MR imaging of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 17:56–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mosher TJ (2006) Musculoskeletal imaging at 3T: current techniques and future applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:63–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramnath RR (2006) 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (part I): considerations, coils, and challenges. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:27–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramnath RR (2006) 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (part II): clinical applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:41–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson J, Huber C, Jaraj P, Colombet P, Allard M, Meyer P (2006) Reduced bone tunnel enlargement post hamstring ACL reconstruction with poly-L-lactic acid/hydroxyapatite bioabsorbable screws. Knee 13:127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Siebold R (2007) Observations on bone tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:291–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Siebold R, Cafaltzis K (2010) Differentiation between intraoperative and postoperative bone tunnel widening and communication in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 26:1066–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E (2010) Placement of femoral tunnel between the AM and PL bundles using a transtibial technique in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1245–1251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sim JA, Yang SH, Ahn BK, Lee BK (2009) Short-term follow-up of double bundle ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendons fixed with ligament plate. J Korean Orthop Assoc 44:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Simonian PT, Erickson MS, Larson RV, O’Kane JW (2000) Tunnel expansion after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 1-incision EndoButton femoral fixation. Arthroscopy 16:707–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Steiner ME, Battaglia TC, Heming JF, Rand JD, Festa A, Baria M (2009) Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 37:1912–1919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson TC, Kantaras A, Atay A, Johnson DL (2004) Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 32:543–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yasuda K, Tanabe Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, Tohyama H (2010) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26:S21–S34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zysk SP, Fraunberger P, Veihelmann A, Dorger M, Kalteis T, Maier M, Pellengahr C, Refior HJ (2004) Tunnel enlargement and changes in synovial fluid cytokine profile following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:98–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beom Koo Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, Y.S., Lee, SW., Nam, S.W. et al. Analysis of tunnel widening after double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 2243–2250 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1874-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1874-5

Keywords

Navigation