Abstract
Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) offers a powerful tool to deal with the structural design with heterogeneous interval parameters concurrently. However, it is time-consuming in the practical engineering design. Therefore, a novel sequential moving asymptote method (SMAM) is proposed to improve the computational efficiency for convex model in this study, in which the nested double-loop optimization problem is decoupled to a sequence of deterministic suboptimization problems based on the method of moving asymptotes. In addition, the sensitivity of reliability index is derived, so the finite difference for the nested optimization loop can be avoided to tremendously improve the computational efficiency. Then, the accuracy of the SMAM is proved based on the error analysis. Furthermore, the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser (KS) function is used to assemble the multiple constraints to deal with the parallel and series RBDO problems. One benchmark mathematical example, three numerical examples, and one complex civil engineering example, i.e., tower crane, are tested to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method by comparison with other existing methods, and the results indicate that SMAM offers a general and effective tool for non-probabilistic reliability analysis and optimization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- RBDO:
-
Reliability-based design optimization
- d :
-
Design variables
- SMAM:
-
Sequential moving asymptote method
- p :
-
Super parameter
- KS:
-
Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser
- η :
-
Non-probabilistic reliability index
- ANVM:
-
Advanced nominal value method
- \( \hat{\eta} \) :
-
Approximated reliability index
- LSF:
-
Limit state function
- \( \underline{\eta} \) :
-
Target non-probabilistic reliability index
- MCP:
-
Most concerned point
- η series :
-
Non-probabilistic reliability index of series system
- FORM:
-
First-order reliability method
- η parallel :
-
Non-probabilistic reliability index of parallel system
- CCSTM:
-
Chaotic conjugate stability transformation method
- f(⋅):
-
Objective function
- MMA:
-
Method of moving asymptotes
- g(⋅):
-
Performance function
- STM:
-
Stability transformation method
- ∇:
-
The first-order sensitivity operator
- DSTM:
-
Directional stability transformation method
- ∇2 :
-
The second-order sensitivity operator
- NRIA:
-
Non-probabilistic reliability index approach
- δ:
-
Perturbation operator
- CPA:
-
Concerned performance approach
- λ :
-
Lagrange multiplier
- FDM:
-
Finite difference method
- E :
-
Failure event
- x :
-
Uncertain variables in physical space
- ε :
-
Convergence precision
- q :
-
Uncertain variables in q-space
- ξ :
-
Controlling parameter of KS function
References
Aoues Y, Chateauneuf A (2010) Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 41:277–294
Ben-Haim Y (1994) A non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Struct Saf 14:227–245
Ben-Haim Y, Elishakoff I (1995) Discussion on: a non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Struct Saf 17:195–199
Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO (1996) Structural reliability methods. Wiley, New York
Elishakoff I (1995) Essay on uncertainties in elastic and viscoelastic structures and viscoelastic structures—from a M Freudenthal’s criticisms to modern convex modelling. Comput Struct 56:871–895
Elishakoff I, Bekel Y (2013) Application of Lamé’s super ellipsoids to model initial imperfections. Int J Appl Mech 80:061006
Elishakoff I, Elettro F (2014) Interval, ellipsoidal, and super-ellipsoidal calculi for experimental and theoretical treatment of uncertainty: which one ought to be preferred. Int J Solids Struct 51:1576–1586
Gandomi AH, Yang XS, Alavi AH (2013) Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Eng Comput 29:17–35
Ganzerli S, Pantelides CP (2000) Optimum structural design via convex model superposition. Comput Struct 74:639–647
Guo S (2014) Robust reliability method for non-fragile guaranteed cost control of parametric uncertain systems. Syst Control Lett 64:27–35
Guo X, Bai W, Zhang W, Gao X (2009) Confidence structural robust design and optimization under stiffness and load uncertainties. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 198:3378–3399
Hamzehkolaei NS, Miri M, Rashki M (2018) New simulation-based frameworks for multi-objective reliability-based design optimization of structures. Appl Math Model 62:1–20
Hao P, Wang Y, Liu X, Wang B, Li G, Wang L (2017) An efficient adaptive-loop method for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 324:689–711
Hu Z, Du XP (2015) First order reliability method for time-variant problems using series expansions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:1–21
Jiang C, Han X, Lu GY, Liu J, Zhang Z, Bai YC (2011) Correlation analysis of non-probabilistic convex model and corresponding structural reliability technique. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 200:2528–2546
Jiang C, Bi RG, Lu GY, Han X (2013) Structural reliability analysis using non-probabilistic convex model. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 254:83–98
Jiang C, Zhang QF, Han X, Liu J, Hu DA (2015) Multidimensional parallelepiped model-a new type of non-probabilistic convex model for structural uncertainty analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 103:31–59
Jiang C, Qiu H, Li X, Chen Z, Gao L, Li P (2019) Iterative reliable design space approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization. Eng Comput 36:151–169
Jiang C, Qiu H, Gao L, Wang D, Yang Z, Chen L (2020) Real-time estimation error-guided active learning Kriging method for time-dependent reliability analysis. Appl Math Model 77:82–98
Kang Z, Bai S (2013) On robust design optimization of truss structures with bounded uncertainties. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47:699–714
Kang Z, Luo Y (2009) Non-probabilistic reliability-based topology optimization of geometrically nonlinear structures using convex models. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 198:3228–3238
Kang Z, Luo Y (2010) Reliability-based structural optimization with probability and convex set hybrid models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42:89–102
Kang Z, Luo Y, Li A (2011) On non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. Struct Saf 33:196–205
Kang YJ, Lim OK, Noh Y (2016) Sequential statistical modeling method for distribution type identification. Struct Multidisc Optim 54:1587–1607
Kang YJ, Noh Y, Lim OK (2019) Integrated statistical modeling method: part I—statistical simulations for symmetric distributions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60:1719–1740
Keshtegar B (2016) Chaotic conjugate stability transformation method for structural reliability analysis. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 310:866–885
Keshtegar B, Chakraborty S (2018) Dynamical accelerated performance measure approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization with highly nonlinear probabilistic constraints. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 178:69–83
Keshtegar B, Hao P (2018) A hybrid descent mean value for accurate and efficient performance measure approach of reliability-based design optimization. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 336:237–259
Keshtegar B, Meng D, Ben Seghier MEA, Xiao M, Trung N-T, Bui DT (2020) A hybrid sufficient performance measure approach to improve robustness and efficiency of reliability-based design optimization. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00907-w
Kreisselmeier G, Steinhauser R (1983) Application of vector performance optimization to a robust control loop design for a fighter aircraft. Int J Control 37:251–284
Lombardi M, Haftka RT (1998) Anti-optimization technique for structural design under load uncertainties. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 157:19–31
Majumder L, Rao SS (2009) Interval-based multi-objective optimization of aircraft wings under gust loads. AIAA J 47:563–575
Meng Z, Keshtegar B (2019) Adaptive conjugate single-loop method for efficient reliability-based design and topology optimization. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 344:95–119
Meng Z, Zhou H (2018) New target performance approach for a super parametric convex model of non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 339:644–662
Meng Z, Li G, Yang D, Zhan L (2017) A new directional stability transformation method of chaos control for first order reliability analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:601–612
Meng Z, Hu H, Zhou H (2018) Super parametric convex model and its application for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization. Appl Math Model 55:354–370
Meng Z, Zhang Z, Zhou H (2020) A novel experimental data-driven exponential convex model for reliability assessment with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. Appl Math Model 77:773–787
Moens D, Vandepitte D (2006) Recent advances in non-probabilistic approaches for non-deterministic dynamic finite element analysis. Arch Comput Method Eng 3:389–464
Ni BY, Jiang C, Huang ZL (2018) Discussions on non-probabilistic convex modelling for uncertain problems. Appl Math Model 59:54–85
Papadrakakis M, Lagaros ND (2002) Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 191:3491–3507
Qiu Z, Elishakoff I (1998) Antioptimization of structures with large uncertain-but-non-random parameters via interval analysis. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 152:361–372
Qiu Z, Ma Y, Wang X (2004) Comparison between non-probabilistic interval analysis method and probabilistic approach in static response problem of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. Commun Numer Meth Eng 20:279–290
Sofi A, Romeo E (2018) A unified response surface framework for the interval and stochastic finite element analysis of structures with uncertain parameters. Probab Eng Mech 54:25–36
Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 24:359–373
Tsompanakis Y, Papadrakakis M (2004) Large-scale reliability-based structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26:429–440
Wang X, Qiu Z, Elishakoff I (2008) Non-probabilistic set-theoretic model for structural safety measure. Acta Mech 198:51–64
Wang L, Xiong C, Yang Y (2018a) A novel methodology of reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization under hybrid interval and fuzzy uncertainties. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 337:439–457
Wang X, Wang R, Wang L, Chen X, Geng X (2018b) An efficient single-loop strategy for reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization under non-probabilistic set theory. Aerosp Sci Technol 73:148–163
Wang L, Wang X, Li Y, Hu J (2019) A non-probabilistic time-variant reliable control method for structural vibration suppression problems with interval uncertainties. Mech Syst Signal Process 115:301–322
Wu J, Zhang D, Liu J, Jia X, Han X (2020) A computational framework of kinematic accuracy reliability analysis for industrial robots. Appl Math Model 82:189–216
Xiao NC, Yuan K, Tang Z, Wan H (2020) Surrogate model-based reliability analysis for structural systems with correlated distribution parameters. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62:495–509
Yang DX (2010) Chaos control for numerical instability of first order reliability method. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 15:3131–3141
Yi P, Cheng G, Jiang L (2008) A sequential approximate programming strategy for performance-measure-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Struct Saf 30:91–109
Youn BD, Wang P (2008) Bayesian reliability-based design optimization using eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36:107–123
Zhang J, Xiao M, Gao L, Chu S (2019) Probability and interval hybrid reliability analysis based on adaptive local approximation of projection outlines using support vector machine. Comput-Aided Civ Inf Eng 34:991–1009
Zhang D, Han X (2020) Kinematic reliability analysis of robotic manipulator. J Mech Des 142
Zhao G, Liu J, Wen G, Li F, Chen Z (2018) Non-probabilistic convex model theory to obtain failure shear stress of simulated lunar soil under interval uncertainties. Probab Eng Mech 53:87–94
Zhu SP, Keshtegar B, Chakraborty S, Trung NT (2020) Novel probabilistic model for searching most probable point in structural reliability analysis. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 366:113027
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Prof. Krister Svanberg for providing the MATLAB MMA code.
Funding
The supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11972143) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. JZ2020HGPA0112) are much appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Replication of results
The algorithm provided in this article is part of the software we are developing. As the software cannot be published due to confidential issue of the funded project, detailed explanation about how the algorithm is implemented in Section 3. Based on the MMA code developed by Svanberg (1987), the proposed algorithm is easy to code. Readers are welcome to contact the authors for details and further explanations.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Yoojeong Noh
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
In the proposed SMAM, we develop the approximate sensitivity analysis method to substitute the FDM in order to promote the efficiency, and the corresponding computational error should be performed. By using the Taylor expansion, we can expand the performance function at the MCP, which is formulated as follows:
where ∇2g denotes the second-order derivative of function g. Then, the sensitivity of approximate non-probabilistic reliability index with respect to design variables in SMAM can be written as follows:
In (41), the term \( \frac{{\left\Vert {\nabla}_{\mathbf{q}}g\left({\mathbf{d}}^m,{\mathbf{q}}^{\ast}\right)\right\Vert}_{\frac{p}{p-1}}}{{\left\Vert {\nabla}_{\mathbf{q}}g\left({\mathbf{d}}^k,{\mathbf{q}}^m\right)\right\Vert}_{\frac{p}{p-1}}} \) can be expanded as follows:
Hence, \( {\nabla}_{{\mathbf{d}}^m}\hat{\eta} \) satisfies:
For reliability index, it can be expanded by Taylor expansion.
Considering q∗ is the optimal solution, which satisfies ∇qη(dm, q∗) = 0, so the error of reliability constraint can be computed as follows:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meng, Z., Ren, S., Wang, X. et al. System reliability-based design optimization with interval parameters by sequential moving asymptote method. Struct Multidisc Optim 63, 1767–1788 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02775-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02775-1