Skip to main content
Log in

Force density method for simultaneous optimization of geometry and topology of trusses

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method of simultaneous optimization of geometry and topology is presented for plane and spatial trusses. Compliance under single loading condition is minimized for specified structural volume. The difficulties due to existence of melting nodes are successfully avoided by considering force density, which is the ratio of axial force to the member length, as design variable. By using the fact that the optimal truss is statically determinate with the same absolute value of stress in existing members, the compliance and structural volume are expressed as explicit functions of force density only. After obtaining optimal cross-sectional area, nodal locations, and topology, the cross-sectional areas and nodal coordinates are further optimized using a conventional method of nonlinear programming. Accuracy of the optimal solution is verified through examples of plane trusses and a spatial truss. It is shown that various nearly optimal solutions can be found using the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtziger W (2007) On simultaneous optimization of truss geometry and topology. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:285–304

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Achtziger W, Bendsøe MP, Ben-Tal A, Zowe J (1992) Equivalent displacement based formulations for maximum strength truss topology design. Impact Comput Sci Eng 4(4):315–345

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Springer

  • Descamps B, Coelho RF (2014) The nominal force method for truss geometry optimization incorporating stability considerations. Int J Solids Struct 51:2390–2399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs W, Felton LP (1969) Optimization of truss geometry. J Struct Div ASCE 95(ST10):2105–2119

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn WR, Gomory R, Greenberg H (1964) Automatic design of optimal structures. J de Mecanique 3:25–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill PE, Murray W, Saunders MA (2002) SNOPT: an SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J Opt 12:979–1006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Liu W, Li H (2003) Simultaneous shape and topology optimization of truss under local and global stability constraints. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinca 16(2):95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagishita T, Ohsaki M (2009) Topology optimization of trusses by growing ground structure approach. Struct Multidisc Optim 37(4):377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemp WS (1973) Optimum structures. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanno Y, Ohsaki M (2003) Minimum principle of complementary energy of cable networks by using second-order cone programming. Int J Solids Struct 40(17):4437–4460

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luh G-C, Lin C-Y (2008) Optimal design of truss structures using ant algorithm. Struct Multidisc Optim 36:365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeown JJ (1998) Growing optimal pin-jointed frames. Struct Opt 15:92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki M (1998) Simultaneous optimization of topology and geometry of a regular plane truss. Comput Struct 66(1):69–77

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki M (2010) Optimization of finite dimensional structures. CRC Press

  • Ohsaki M, Arora JS (1993) A direct application of higher order parametric programming techniques to structural optimization. Int J Numer Meth Engng 36:2683–2702

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Labanda S, Stolpe M (2015) Benchmarking optimization solvers for structural topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 52:527–547

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schek H-J (1974) The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3:115–134

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe M (2007) On the reformulation of topology optimization problems as linear or convex quadratic mixed 0-1 programs. Opt Eng 8:163–192

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tibert AG, Pellegrino S (2011) Review of form-finding methods for tensegrity structures. Int J Space Structures 26(3):241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Soh CK (2002) Automated optimum design of structures using genetic programming. Comp Struct 80:1537–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JY, Ohsaki M (2015) Tensegrity structures: form, stability, and symmetry. Mathematics for Industry 6. Springer

  • Zhang JY, Ohsaki M (2006) Adaptive force density method for form-finding problem of tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 43(18–19):5658–5673

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI No. 16H03014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Ohsaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohsaki, M., Hayashi, K. Force density method for simultaneous optimization of geometry and topology of trusses. Struct Multidisc Optim 56, 1157–1168 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1710-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1710-8

Keywords

Navigation