Skip to main content
Log in

Response surface single loop reliability-based design optimization with higher-order reliability assessment

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) aims at determination of the optimal design in the presence of uncertainty. The available Single-Loop approaches for RBDO are based on the First-Order Reliability Method (FORM) for the computation of the probability of failure, along with different approximations in order to avoid the expensive inner loop aiming at finding the Most Probable Point (MPP). However, the use of FORM in RBDO may not lead to sufficient accuracy depending on the degree of nonlinearity of the limit-state function. This is demonstrated for an extensively studied reliability-based design for vehicle crashworthiness problem solved in this paper, where all RBDO methods based on FORM strongly violates the probabilistic constraints. The Response Surface Single Loop (RSSL) method for RBDO is proposed based on the higher order probability computation for quadratic models previously presented by the authors. The RSSL-method bypasses the concept of an MPP and has high accuracy and efficiency. The method can solve problems with both constant and varying standard deviation of design variables and is particularly well suited for typical industrial applications where general quadratic response surface models can be used. If the quadratic response surface models of the deterministic constraints are valid in the whole region of interest, the method becomes a true single loop method with accuracy higher than traditional SORM. In other cases, quadratic response surface models are fitted to the deterministic constraints around the deterministic solution and the RBDO problem is solved using the proposed single loop method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal H, Mozumder CK, Renaud JE, Watson LT (2007) An inverse-measure-based unilevel architecture for reliability-based design optimization. J Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(3):217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSYS (2009) 12.1 ed. s.l.: SAS IP, Inc

  • Aoues Y, Chateauneuf A (2010) Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 41(2):277–294

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barton RR (1992) Metamodels for simulation input-output relations. In: Swain JJ, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 1992 Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, VA, IEEE, pp 289–299

  • Breitung K (1984) Asymptotic approximations for multi-normal integrals. J Eng Mech Div 110(3):357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Hasselman TK, Neill DJ (1997) Reliability based structural design optimization for practical applications. In: Proceedings of the 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, FL, Paper No. AIAA-97-1403, pp. 27242732

  • Choi S-K, Grandhi R, Canfield R (2007) Reliability-based structural design. Springer-Verlag, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dersjo T, Olsson M (2011) Reliability based design optimization using a single constraint approximation point. J Mech Des 133(3):031006–1-031006-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Chen W (2004) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. ASME J Mech Des 126(2):225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu L, Yang RJ, Tho CH, Makowskit M, Faruquet O, Lit Y (2001) Optimization and robustness for crashworthiness of side impact. Int J Veh Des 26(4):348–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinta AA, Dudley JM, Narducci R, Grossman B, Haftka RT, Mason WH, Watson LT (1994) Noisy aerodynamic response and smooth approximation in HSCT design. In: Proceedings 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City, FL, Sept. 7-9, pp. 1117–1128

  • Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) Exact and invariant second moment code format. J Eng Mech Div 100 (1):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 23:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Choi KK, Zhao L (2011) Sampling-based rbdo using the stochastic sensitivity analysis and dynamic kriging method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(3):299–317

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Noh Y, Yoo D (2015) A novel second order reliability method (sorm) using noncentral or generalized chi-squared distributions. J Mech Des 134(10):100912–1–100912–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Wu T, Hu M, Dong J (2010) An accurate penalty-based approach for reliability-based design optimization. Res Eng Design 21(2):87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Mourelatos ZP, Tu J (2008) A single-loop method for reliability-based design optimization. Int J Product Development 5(1):76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC (1986) Methods of structural safety. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour R, Olsson M (2014) A closed-form second-order reliability method using noncentral chi-squared distributions. ASME J Mech Des 136(10):101402–1–101402–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan S, Wang G (2008) Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(8):1218–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu J, Choi KK, Young HP (1999) A new study on reliability- based design optimization. ASME J Mech Des 121(4):557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tvedt L (1984) Two Second-Order Approximations to the Failure Probability-Section on Structural Reliability. Tech. rep., A/S Veritas Research, Hovik

  • Valdebenito MA, Schuller GI (2010) A survey on approaches for reliability-based optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(5):645–663

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang P (2014) A maximum confidence enhancement based sequential sampling scheme for simulation-based design. J Mech Des 136(2):021006–1-021006-10

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Gu L (2004) Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 26(1): 152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin X, Chen W (2006) Enhanced sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for probabilistic optimization with varying design variance. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2(3):261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Ono T (1999) New approximations for SORM: Part 1. J Eng Mech 125(1):79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support from Scania CV AB is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rami Mansour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansour, R., Olsson, M. Response surface single loop reliability-based design optimization with higher-order reliability assessment. Struct Multidisc Optim 54, 63–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1386-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1386-x

Keywords

Navigation