Skip to main content
Log in

An application of multi-objective stochastic optimisation to structural design

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An application to structural design of an innovative method for optimising stochastic systems is introduced in the paper. The proposed method allows one to carry out both the multi-objective optimisation of a structural element and to improve the robustness of the design. The innovative method is rather general. To show its effectiveness, an ideal cantilever has been designed in order to minimise both mass and deflection. The cantilever is shaped as a beam and is subject to random loads acting at its free end. The beam geometrical dimensions and material properties vary stochastically due to manufacturing tolerances. Different beam cross sections and two different materials (aluminium alloy and steel) have been considered. From the optimisation, it turned out that the optimal solutions are the O and the I beam, depending on the required lightness and stiffness. Compared to steel, aluminium alloy beams have provided better (or at least equal) performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballio, G.; Mazzolani, F.M. 1988: Steel structures (in Italian). Milan: Hoepli

  2. Beretta, S.; Citti, P.; Capitani, R.; Paolini, G. 1999: Quality Reliability and Safety of Mechanical structures and Systems (in Italian). Florence: CUSL

  3. Bjorkman, M.; Holmstrom, K. 1999: Global Optimization using the DIRECT Algorithm in MATLAB. Adv Model Optim1(2)

  4. Caballero, R.; Cerdá, E.; Muñoz, M.M.; Rey, L.; Stancu-Minasian, I.M. 2001: Efficient Solution Concepts and Their Relations in Stochastic Multiobjective Programming. J Optim Theory Appl110(1)

  5. Cedolin, L.; Baant, Z. 1991: Stability of Structures. New York: Oxford University Press

  6. Chen, W.; Sahai, A.; Messac, A.; Sundararaj, G. 2000: Exploration of the Effectiveness of Physical Programming in Robust Design. J Mech Des122

  7. Chen, W.; Wiecek, M.; Zhang, J. 1999: Quality Utility – A Compromise Programming Approach to Robust Design. J Mech Des121(2)

  8. Clark, J.W.; Hill, H.N. 1962: Lateral Buckling of Beams and Girders. Trans ASCE127, Part II

  9. Das, I. 1999: A preference ordering among various Pareto optimal alternatives. Struct Optim18, 30–35

    Google Scholar 

  10. DIRECT 1999: Encyclopedia of Optimization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

  11. Eggert, R.J.; Mayne, R.W. 1990: Probabilistic Optimization Using Successive Surrogate Probability Density Functions. Proceedings ASME 16thDesign Automation Conf., Chicago, IL, DE-Vol. 23–1

  12. Emch, G.; Parkinson, A. 1993: Robust Optimal Design for Worst-Case Tolerances. Proceedings of the 1993 ASME Design Automation Conf., DE-Vol. 65–1, Albuquerque, NM

  13. Fadel, G.; Li, Y. 2002: Approximating the Pareto curve to help solve biobjective design problems. Struct Optim23, 280–296

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gobbi, M.; Mastinu, G.; Caudano, M. 2003: Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimisation of a Gearbox Synchroniser and Selector Mechanism. In Advanced Vehicle Technologies, ASME IMECE, Washington, November 2003

  15. Gobbi, M.; Mastinu, G. 2003: Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimisation for the Design of Vehicle Systems. Proc. of the WCSMO5, Italy, May 2003

  16. Johnston, B.G. 1976: Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures. NJ: Wiley

  17. Mattson, C.A.; Messac, A. 2002: A Non-Deterministic Approach to Concept Selection Using s-Pareto Frontiers. Proc. of ASME DETC 2002, DETC2002/DAC-34125, Session DAC-17: Multiobjective Optimisation, Montreal, Canada

  18. Mattson, C.A.; Messac, A. 2003: Concept Selection Using s-Pareto Frontiers. AIAA J41(6), 1190–1198

    Google Scholar 

  19. Messac, A.; Ismail-Yahaya, A. 2002: Multiobjective robust design using physical programming. Struct Optim23, 357–371

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miettinen, K. 1999: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Boston: Kluwer Academic

  21. Mohandas, S.U.; Sandgren, E. 1989: Multiobjective optimization dealing with uncertainty. Proc. 15-th ASME Design Automation Conference, DE Vol. 19-2

  22. Narayanan, S.; Azarm, S. 1999: On improving multi-objective genetic algorithms for design optimization. Struct Optim18, 146–155

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pilkey, W.D. 1994: Formulas for Stress, Strain and Structural Matrices. NJ: Wiley

  24. Rao, S.S. 1974: A Probabilistic Approach to the Design of Gear Trains. Int J Mach Tool Des Res14

  25. Rao, S.S. 1987: Multi-Objective Optimization of Fuzzy Structural Systems. Int J Numer Methods Eng24

  26. Segui, W.T. 1989: Fundamentals of structural steel design. Boston: PWS-Kent

  27. Siddal, J.N. 1984: A New Approach to Probability in Enginnering Design and Optimization. ASME J Mech Trans Autom Des106, 5–10

  28. Siddal, J.N. 1983: Probabilistic Engineering Design: Principles and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker

  29. Thompson, J.M.T.; Hunt, C.W. 1974: Dangers of Structural Optimization. Eng Optim2

  30. Yang, B.S.; Yeun, Y-S.; Ruy, W-S. 2002: Managing approximation models in multi-objective optimization. Struct Optim24, 141–156

  31. Zhang, W.H.; Yang, H.C. 2002: Efficient gradient calculation of the Pareto optimal curve in multicriteria optimisation. Struct Optim23, 311–319

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Levi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levi, F., Gobbi, M. & Mastinu, G. An application of multi-objective stochastic optimisation to structural design. Struct Multidisc Optim 29, 272–284 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0456-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0456-2

Keywords

Navigation