Skip to main content
Log in

Fragments of \(HA\) based on \(\Sigma_1\)-induction

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In the first part of this paper we investigate the intuitionistic version \(iI\!\Sigma_1\) of \(I\!\Sigma_1\) (in the language of \(PRA\)), using Kleene's recursive realizability techniques. Our treatment closely parallels the usual one for \(HA\) and establishes a number of nice properties for \(iI\!\Sigma_1\), e.g. existence of primitive recursive choice functions (this is established by different means also in [D94]). We then sharpen an unpublished theorem of Visser's to the effect that quantifier alternation alone is much less powerful intuitionistically than classically: \(iI\!\Sigma_1\) together with induction over arbitrary prenex formulas is \(\Pi_2\)-conservative over \(iI\!\Pi_2\). In the second part of the article we study the relation of \(iI\!\Sigma_1\) to \(iI\!\Pi_1\) (in the usual arithmetical language). The situation here is markedly different from the classical case in that \(iI\!\Pi_1\) and \(iI\!\Sigma_1\) are mutually incomparable, while \(iI\!\Sigma_1\) is significantly stronger than \(iI\!\Pi_1\) as far as provably recursive functions are concerned: All primitive recursive functions can be proved total in \(iI\!\Sigma_1\) whereas the provably recursive functions of \(iI\!\Pi_1\) are all majorized by polynomials over \({\Bbb N}\). 0 \(iI\!\Pi_1\) is unusual also in that it lacks closure under Markov's Rule \(\mbox{MR}_{PR}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received April 4, 1996

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wehmeier, K. Fragments of \(HA\) based on \(\Sigma_1\)-induction. Arch Math Logic 37, 37–49 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001530050081

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001530050081

Keywords

Navigation