Abstract
Screen time has become a hot button issue in psychology with researchers fiercely debating its mental effects. If we want to understand the psychological dynamics of technology use, however, a numerical conceptualization of screen time will lead us to gloss over crucial distinctions. To make this point, the present article takes a hermeneutic approach to a negative form of screen time known as ‘phubbing’, which is the practice of snubbing conversational partners in favor of one’s phone. Using interview data, it is demonstrated that whether or not phone use amounts to phubbing, that is, whether or not it tips over and becomes harmful, depends on a host of contextual factors such as relation (who), content (what), purpose (why), timing (when), and communication (how). These findings demonstrate that not all screen time is created equal: what is harmful and inappropriate in one context is benign in another, and vice versa. Simply put, screen time is not a numerical entity whose causal effects we can measure and explain, but a meaningful activity that we must try to understand.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Danish interview transcripts available through contact with the first author.
Change history
27 July 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01237-6
References
Aagaard J (2020) Digital Akrasia: a qualitative study of phubbing. AI Soc 35(1):237–244
Al-Saggaf Y, O’Donnell S (2019) Phubbing: perceptions, reasons behind, predictors, and impacts. Human Behav Emerg Technol 1(2):132–140
Ballard M, Gray M, Reilly J, Noggle M (2009) Correlates of video game screen time among males: body mass, physical activity, and other media use. Eat Behav 10(3):161–167
Benediktsson M, Alexander D, Bermeo J, Contreras J, Kingston B, Harper W, Henkin J, Lopez F, Wagenheim R, Williams A (2015) Hybrid strategies: allocating involvement in the digital age. Symb Interact 38(3):331–351
Blum-Ross A, Livingstone S (2018) The Trouble with “Screen Time” rules. In: Mascheroni G, Ponte C, Jorge A (eds) digital parenting: the challenges for families in the digital age. Nordicom, Göteborg
Brinkmann S (2014) Doing without data. Qual Inq 20(6):720–725
Brinkmann S, Kvale S (2015) InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Cahir J, Lloyd J (2015) ‘People Just Don’t Care’: practices of text messaging in the presence of others. Media Cult Soc 37(5):703–719
Chotpitayasunondh V, Douglas K (2018) The effects of “Phubbing” on social interaction. J Appl Soc Psychol 48(6):304–316
Cummings R, Reimer T (2020) Cellphone relevance in face-to-face interactions: the effects of cellphone use on conversational satisfaction. Mobile Media Commun Adv Online Publ. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920958437
Dilthey W (1976) Ideas about a descriptive and analytical psychology. In: Rickman HP (ed) W. Dilthey: selected writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dreyfus H (1991) Between man and nature. Harvard Rev Philos 1(1):6–19
Dreyfus H (2014) Holism and hermeneutics. In: Wrathall M (ed) Skillful coping: essays in the phenomenology of everyday perception and action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Drouin M, McDaniel B (2018) Technology interference in couple and family relationships. In: Attrill-Smith A, Fullwood C, Keep M, Kuss D (eds) The Oxford handbook of cyberpsychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Geertz C (1973) Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New York
Hale L, Guan S (2015) Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic literature review. Sleep Med Rev 21:50–58
Hasse C (2021) Material hermeneutics as cultural learning: from relations to processes of relations. AI Soc Adv Online Publ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01171-7
Hiniker A, Suh H, Cao S, Kientz J (2016) Screen time tantrums: how families manage screen media experiences for toddlers and preschoolers. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’16), p 648–660
Husen M (1996) Det fælles tredje [The common third]. In: Pécseli B (ed) Kultur & pædagogik [Culture & pedagogy]. Hans Reitzels Forlag, Copenhagen
Ihde D (1998) Expanding hermeneutics: visualism in science. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Kaye L, Orben A, Ellis D, Hunter S, Houghton S (2020) The conceptual and methodological mayhem of ”screen time”. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(10):3661
Kelly L, Miller-Ott A, Duran R (2017) Sports scores and intimate moments: an expectancy violations theory approach to partner cell phone behaviors in adult romantic relationships. West J Commun 81(5):619–640
Magee C, Lee J, Vella S (2014) bidirectional relationships between sleep duration and screen time in early childhood. JAMA Pediatr 168(5):465–470
McDaniel B, Coyne S (2016a) “Technoference”: the interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychol Pop Media Cult 5(1):85–98
McDaniel B, Coyne S (2016b) Technology interference in the parenting of young children: implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting. Soc Sci J 53(4):435–443
McDaniel B, Radesky J (2018) Technoference: parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Dev 89(1):100–109
McDaniel B, Wesselman E (2021) “You Phubbed Me for That?” Reason given for phubbing and perceptions of interactional quality and exclusion. Human Behav Emerg Technol Adv Online Publ. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.255
McDaniel B, Galovan A, Cravens J, Drouin M (2018) “Technoference” and implications for mothers’ and fathers’ couple and coparenting relationship quality. Comput Hum Behav 80:303–313
Merleau-Ponty M (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge Classics, London
Miller-Ott A, Kelly L (2015) The presence of cell phones in romantic partner face-to-face interactions: an expectancy violation theory approach. South Commun J 80(4):253–270
Orben A (2020) Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 55(4):407–414
Orben A, Przybylski A (2019a) screens, teens, and psychological well-being: evidence from three time-use-diary studies. Psychol Sci 30(5):682–696
Orben A, Przybylski A (2019b) The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nat Human Behav 3(2):173–182
Roberts J, David M (2016) My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among partners. Comput Hum Behav 54:134–141
Roberts J, David M (2017) Put down your phone and listen to me: how boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Comput Hum Behav 75:206–217
Roberts J, David M (2020) Boss phubbing, trust, job satisfaction and employee performance. Personal Individual Diff 155(1):109702
Sigman A (2012) Time for a view on screen time. Arch Dis Child 97(11):935–942
Sisson S, Broyles S, Baker B, Katzmarzyk P (2010) Screen time, physical activity, and over-weight in US Youth: National Survey of Children’s Health 2003. J Adolesc Health 47(3):309–311
Sundqvist A, Heimann M, Koch FS (2020) Relationship between technoference and behavior problems in children aged 4–5 years. Cyberpsychol Behav Social Netw Adv Online Publ. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0512
Tripathi A (2017) Hermeneutics of technological culture. AI Soc 32(2):137–148
Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, New York
Twenge J, Campbell WK (2018) Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: evidence from a population-based study. Prevent Med Rep 12:271–283
Twenge J, Martin G, Campbell WK (2018) Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion 18(6):765–780
Vanden Abeele M, Hendrickson A, Pollman M, Ling R (2019) Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: an exploratory observation study. Comput Hum Behav 100:35–47
Yanchar S (2006) On the possibility of contextual-quantitative inquiry. New Ideas Psychol 24(3):212–228
Yang CC, Christofferson K (2020) On the phone when we’re hanging out: digital social multitasking (DSMT) and its socioemotional implications. J Youth Adolesc 49(6):1209–1224
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aagaard, J., Steninge, E. & Zhang, Y. On the hermeneutics of screen time. AI & Soc 38, 2329–2337 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01223-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01223-y