Abstract
Robots are coming into different spheres of our daily lives, and therefore it is important that we now reflect systematically and in a comprehensive and inclusive way on the effects this may have on human interactions with other people and with machines. In Delmenhorst we held the conference “Going beyond the Laboratory.” Reflecting on the discussions of the conference, the editorial team realized a conceptual gap between the engineering sciences on the one hand and the social sciences and philosophy on the other hand. In order to initiate first steps in the direction of overcoming this divide, the editorial team decided to put forth three questions crucial for the issue of social interaction with robots and collected answers by experts in different robotics research projects. The questions are: How are we to understand the term robot autonomy in robotics and in social life? How is the idea of robot autonomy related to the limits of mathematization? I.e. is it possible, to fully express mathematically processes of social interaction? And finally, how are interactions between humans and robots in everyday life related to social institutions on a micro- and macro-level?
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
February 2014 at the Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg (Institute for Advanced Study) in Delmenhorst, Germany.
See the discussion on human rights and privacy in Matsuzaki and Lindemann (this issue).
References
Boyoon J, Sukhatme GS (2010) Real-time motion tracking from a mobile robot. Int J Soc Robot 2:63–78
Duro R, Kondratenko Y (eds) (2015) Advances in intelligent robotics and collaborative automation. Aalborg, Denmark
Garfinkel H, Sacks H (1970) On formal structures of practical action. In: McKinney JC, Tiryakian EA (eds) Theoretical sociology: perspectives and developments. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 338–366
Habermas J (1981/1987) Theory of communicative action volume two: liveworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press, Boston
Honneth A (2007) Reification: a recognition-theoretical view. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kennedy WG, Trafton JG (2011) How long is a moment: the perception and reality of task-related absences. Int J Soc Robot 3:243–252
Lindemann G (2014) Weltzugänge. Die mehrdimensionale Ordnung des Sozialen. Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist
Luhmann N (1984/1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Mead GH (1934/1967) Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Nagai Y, Hosoda K, Morita A, Asada M (2003) A constructive model for the development of joint attention. Connect Sci 15:211–229
Plessner H (1928/1975) Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. deGruyter, Berlin
Prats M, del Pobil AP, Sanz PJ (eds) (2008) Robot physical interaction through the combination of vision, tactile and force feedback (applications to assistive robotics series: springer tracts in advanced robotics). Springer, Heidelberg
Taylor G, Kleeman L (eds) (2006) Visual perception and robotic manipulation: 3D object recognition, tracking and hand-eye coordination (Springer tracts in advanced robotics). Springer, Berlin
von Bertalanffy L (1976) General system theory. George Braziller, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindemann, G. Social interaction with robots: three questions. AI & Soc 31, 573–575 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0633-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0633-4