Skip to main content
Log in

Designing trust in the Internet services

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Being a supersophisticated system, the Internet not only gives unquestionable benefits but also brings some problems. These problems are caused by the transparency of the network space for creators and its nontransparency for general users, who experience processing complexity, lack of privacy, and fear of making a mistake. Such problems give grounds for questioning whether users can trust Internet services. We analyze graphic design and public relations (PR) as tools used to generate trust in Internet services under both the circumstances of transparency and nontransparency of the Internet. Our analysis shows that visual, reputational, and contextual factors have crucial importance in generating trust in Internet services under the circumstances of transparency and nontransparency of the network space; graphic design and PR play a critical role. Interactive design develops network images that produce the initial impression and lay the foundation for users’ trust (or lack of trust) in network resources (the perceptual and emotional level). PR tools are used to complete the process of generating trust by turning the initial impression into such qualitative characteristics as goodwill and information transparency with regard to status and social context (the rational level). Such combined application of graphic design and PR tools leads to harmonization of the network environment and generates users’ trust in Internet services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Internet services or Web services are different software systems identifiable by web addresses. They have standardized interfaces, which provide computer–human interaction. Internet services are sites that usually offer Internet users some free services: search engines, mailing systems, free hosting services, and others. They must be distinguished from other online resources: commercial (corporate sites and online shops); informative and entertaining (online media and encyclopedias); and social networks (Facebook, VKontakte, and others).

  2. According to the data provided by the All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM), users’ trust in Internet resources is ranked as follows: social networks (62 %), online encyclopedias (e.g., Wikipedia) (57 %), and online media (56 %) are considered the most trusted. Forums, blogs, and chats enjoy 47 % of users’ trust, and only 32 % of users trust Internet services. (http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=459&uid=112964).

  3. The decision of granting trust is based on faith in the beneficial behavior of a trustee that corresponds to the interests and the requirements of a trustor. This kind of trust is connected with the expectations of a trustor that a trustee will act a certain way (Hardin 1991).

  4. This kind of trust means that permission to take care of something important for a trustor is granted to a third party (a person or an organization); a trustee voluntarily assumes the obligations; and responsive trust can be connected with some kind of authority (Baier 1995: 105).

  5. This kind of trust is formed as a result of the demonstration of the reliability of a trustee.

  6. http://photojojo.com/store/.

  7. http://kontur.ru/articles/402; http://freshit.net/blog/poleznye-materialy/5-sposobov-povysit-doverie-k-sajtu/; http://seo-design.net/raskrutka/how-to-increase-website-trust; http://habrahabr.ru/company/zfort/blog/149771/.

  8. http://www.google.com/design/.

  9. Publicity capital is a specific kind of capital; it belongs to a market participant who functions in public communications. Publicity capital is different from other kinds of capital, but it has largely been derived from them. Publicity capital is a social attitude that is connected with the property and self-expansion of values by means of using the value of the property (Shishkina 2002).

  10. http://mailchimp.com/.

  11. http://www.wufoo.com/.

  12. http://www.housingworks.org/.

References

  • Baier A (1995) Moral prejudices: essays on ethics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes R (1989) Selected works: semiotics, poetics. Progress, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (1994) Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocharov M (2002) Istoriya public relations: nravy, biznes, nauka [The history of public relations: mores, business, and science]. Izvestiya (in Russian)

  • Boiry P (2001) Public Relations ili strategiya doveriya [Public relations or the strategy of trust]. Infra-M (in Russian)

  • Bondarenko S (2003) Problema doveriya v kiberprostranstve [The problem of trust in cyberspace]. PR-tekhnologii v informatsionnom obshchestve. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii SPbGPU [PR-technologies in the information society: Proceedings of the all-Russian scientific and practical conference, SPSPU]. SPSPU (in Russian)

  • Bourdieu P (2001) Prakticheskiy smysl [Practical sense]. Aleteya (in Russian)

  • Crawford C (2002) The art of interactive design: a euphonious and illuminating guide to building successful software. No Starch Press

  • Dowling G (2001) Creating corporate reputations: identity, image, and performance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyakova E, Trakhtenberg A (2001) Massovaya kommunikatsiya: modeli vliyaniya [Mass communication: models of influence]. Izdatelstvo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta (in Russian)

  • Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazychev V (2004) Teoreticheskiye i metodologicheskiye issledovaniya v dizayne [Theoretical and methodological studies in design]. Shkola kulturnoy politiki (in Russian)

  • Hardin R (1991) Trusting persons. Trusting institutions. The strategy and choice. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyushin I (2005) Slagayemye imidzheologii i PR-dizayna [Issues of image studies and PR-design]. Trudy Dalnevostochnogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Far Eastern National Technical University Proceedings], pp 98–108 (in Russian)

  • Kollock P (1994) The emergence of exchange structures: an experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Am J Sociol 100(2):313–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshelyuk M (2004) Tekhnologii politicheskikh vyborov [The technologies of political elections]. Piter (in Russian)

  • Kuzheleva-Sagan I (2011) Nauchnoye znaniye o svyazyakh s obshchestvennostyu: filosovskiy analiz [Scientific knowledge about public relations: philosophical analysis]. Librokom (in Russian)

  • Laptev V (2005) Reklama: machekha graficheskogo dizayna [advertising: stepmother of graphic design]. Prost Dizayn 4:27–31 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lola G (2010) Kommunikativniy resurs dizayna: metodologicheskiy aspect [Communicative resource of design: methodological aspect]. Vestnik SpbGUKI:16-19 (in Russian)

  • Lotman J (1992) Izbrannye statyi v trekh tomakh [Featured articles in three volumes]. Alexandra (in Russian)

  • Luhmann N (2000) Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives. Making and breaking cooperative relations. In: Gambetta (ed) Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations, pp 94–107. http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/luhmann94-107.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2014

  • Mitchell W (2003) Me++: the cyborg self and the Networked City. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigulevskiy V (2014) Dizayn i kultura [Design and culture]. Gumanitarniy tsentr (in Russian)

  • Pribytkova N (2006) Dizayn i public relations [Design and public relations]. PR-Universum 2006. Trudy II Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Proceedings of the 2nd all-Russian scientific and practical conference], pp 134–136 (in Russian)

  • Rheingold H (2003) Smart mobs: the next social revolution. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman A (2000) The problem of trust. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishkina M (2002) Public relations v sisteme sotsialnogo upravleniya [Public relations in the system of social management]. Pallada-Media (in Russian)

  • Stepanov J (2001) Konstanty: Slovar russkoy kultury [Constants: the dictionary of the Russian culture]. Academic Project

  • Stivers R (1994) The culture of cynicism: American morality in decline. Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka P (2012) Doveriye—osnova obshchestva [Trust is the foundation of the society]. Logos (in Russian)

  • Tönnies F (1957) Community and society. Courier Dover Publications, Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  • Veselov J (2004) Sotsiologicheskaya teoriya doveriya [Sociological theory of trust]. Ekonomika i sotsiologiya doveriya [Economy and sociology of trust], pp 16–32 (in Russian)

  • Weinschenk S (2011) 100 things every designer needs to know about people (voices that matter). New Riders, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson I (2001) Anxiety in a “Risk” society (health, risk and society). Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina P. Kuzheleva-Sagan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuzheleva-Sagan, I.P., Suchkova, N.A. Designing trust in the Internet services. AI & Soc 31, 381–392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0622-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0622-7

Keywords

Navigation