Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Different Nanomaterials for Soil Remediation Affect Avoidance Response and Toxicity Response in Earthworm (Eisenia fetida)

  • Published:
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of nano-level passivating agents in the remediation of soil heavy metal pollution has received widespread attention, but its harm to soil animals should also be addressed. This study explored the effect of three nanomaterials—nanohydroxyapatite apatite (n-HAP), nano zeolite (n-zeolite), and nanometer iron oxide (n-Fe3O4), on catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) content through filter paper contact test. The effects of nanomaterials spiked at 1.5%wt of soils on earthworm avoidance behavior were also be studied, and the crystallinity and surface charge of three nanomaterials were characterized. The results showed that the activities of CAT, SOD and POD and the content of MDA have been changed at different level. And earthworms have obvious avoidance behavior to the three kinds of nanomaterials. Therefore, nanomaterials do have adverse effects on earthworms, and their biological toxicity should be considered when selecting passivating agents for soil heavy metal pollution remediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abin S, Ashwini N, Prasad M (2019) Cadmium and sodium adsorption properties of magnetite nanoparticles synthesized from Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. bark: relevance in amelioration of metal stress in rice. J Hazard Mater 371:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigorgne E, Foucaud L, Lapied E et al (2011) Ecotoxicological assessment of TiO2 byproducts on the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environ Pollut 159(10):2698–2705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng JM, Liu YZ, Wang HW (2014) Effects of surface-modified nano-scale carbon black on Cu and Zn fractionations in contaminated soil. Int J Phytorem 16(1):86–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cossu C, Doyotte A, Jacquin MC et al (1997) Glutathione reductase, selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase, glutathione levels, and lipid peroxidation in freshwater bivalves,unio tumidus,as biomarkers of aquatic contamination in field studies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 38(2):0–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkady MF, Mahmoud MM, Abd-El-Rahman HM (2011) Kinetic approach for cadmium sorption using microwave synthesized nano-hydroxyapatite. J Non-Cryst Solids 357(3):0–1129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo C, Costa G, Nande M et al (2019) Heavy metals immobilization capability of two iron-based nanoparticles (nZVI and Fe3O4): soil and freshwater bioassays to assess ecotoxicological impact. Sci Total Environ 656:421–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foroutan R, Ahmadlouydarab M, Ramavandi B et al (2018) Studying the physicochemical characteristics and metals adsorptive behavior of CMC-g-HAP/Fe3O4 nano biocomposite. J Environ Chem Eng 6:6049–6058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Jiang C, Xu Z et al (2019) Synthesis of bitter gourd-shaped nano scaled hydroxyapatite and its adsorption property for heavy metal ions. Mater Lett 241:176–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Wu H, Jan VDKT (2015) The health effects of exposure to arsenic-contaminated drinking water: a review by global geographical distribution. Int J Environ Health Res 25(4):432–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim NS, Ahn J, Lee BK et al (2017) Environmental exposures to lead, mercury, and cadmium among South Korean teenagers (KNHANES 2010–2013): body burden and risk factors. Environ Res 156:468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Yang Y, Xie JW et al (2019) In-vivo and in-vitro tests to assess toxic mechanisms of nano ZnO to earthworms. Sci Total Environ 687:71–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang SX, Jin Y, Liu W et al (2017) Feasibility of Pb phytoextraction using nano-materials assisted ryegrass: results of a one-year fieldscale experiment. J Environ Manag 190:170–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Su B, Sun M et al (2018) Biosynthesized iron oxide nanoparticles used for optimized removal of cadmium with response surface methodology. Sci Total Environ 627:314–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Li W, Song W et al (2018) Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: principles and applicability. Sci Total Environ 633:206–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo HW, Wee LW, Wu YC et al (2018) Hydrothermal synthesis of needle-like nanocrystalline zeolites from metakaolin and their applications for efficient removal of organic pollutants and heavy metals. Micropor Mesopor Mat 272:8–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marinella F, Josep S, Damià B (2011) Analysis and assessment of the occurrence, the fate and the behavior of nanomaterials in the environment. Trac Trends Anal Chem 30(3):517–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo X, Qiao Y, Sun Z et al (2012) Molecular toxicity of earthworms induced by cadmium contaminated soil and biomarkers screening. J Environ Sci 24(8):1504–1510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Modesto KA, Cláudia B (2010) Roundup causes oxidative stress in liver and inhibits acetylcholinesterase in muscle and brain of the fish Prochilodus lineatus. Chemosphere 78(3):0–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morsi RE, Al-Sabagh AM, Moustafa YM et al (2018) Polythiophene modified chitosan/magnetite nanocomposites for heavy metals and selective mercury removal. Egypt J Petrol 27(4):1077–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L et al (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311(5761):622–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1984) Guidelines for testing of chemicals, earthworm acute toxicity tests (filter paper test and artificial soil test), vol 207. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oost RVD, Beyer J, Vermeulen NPE (2003) Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 13(2):57–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshrat HF, Nir D, Simon B, Yoram A (2007) Targeting of nanoparticles to the clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway. Biochem Biophy Res Commun 353(1):26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva PMCSD, Amarasinghe NJDS (2008) Assessment of dimethoate toxicity on compost worm (Eisenia andrei) using earthworm avoidance test. J Trop Agric 20:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Syed Z, Alexander D, Ali J et al (2016) Chemosensory cues alter earthworm (Eisenia fetida) avoidance of lead-contaminated soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:999–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang HQ, Xu M, Zhou XR et al (2018) Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized copper nano-particles in rats after oral administration. Mater Sci Eng C 93:649–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva A, CaEte M, Roca AG et al (2009) The influence of surface functionalization on the enhanced internalization of magnetic nanoparticles in cancer cells. Nanotechnology 20(11):115103–115100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan R, Meng F, Fu W et al (2015) Biochemical responses in the gills of Meretrix meretrix after exposure to treated municipal effluent. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 111:78–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Li Z, Lu X et al (2018) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: pollution and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 642:690–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fund Committee, China (Grant Numbers 41877119 and 41471255) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Numbers 2018YFD0800306-04 and 2018YFF0213404).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiemin Cheng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Xu, K. & Cheng, J. Different Nanomaterials for Soil Remediation Affect Avoidance Response and Toxicity Response in Earthworm (Eisenia fetida). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 104, 477–483 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-02823-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-020-02823-y

Keywords

Navigation