Abstract
Little is known about the statistical consequences of plot size and their spatial arrangement when addressing biodiversity questions. Thus, we compared three vegetation plot sizes and two sampling designs with different spatial arrangements in alpine grasslands by analyzing their effects on common indices of alpha, beta and gamma plant species diversity. Data were collected in three 1-km2 squares in summer pastures in the subalpine and alpine zones in Switzerland. In each square, 45 nested plots were distributed according to systematic random sampling (i.e., when the focus is on the abundances of the vegetation types and species) and maximum variation sampling (i.e., when the focus is on the set of vegetation types and species occurring). To compare the effects of the plot sizes and sampling designs on estimates of gamma diversity, we also estimated gamma diversity from an exhaustive sampling of the squares. Compared with systematic random sampling, maximum variation sampling hardly affected the indices of alpha diversity, but resulted in higher indices of beta and gamma diversity. More importantly, alpha and gamma diversity were found to be higher as plot size increased, whereas beta diversity was lower in the larger plots. Gamma diversity from the exhaustive sample was most similar to gamma diversity from maximum variation sampling on the largest plot sizes. Moreover, results from a variation partitioning analysis showed that landscape variability and plot size had a much larger effect on species diversity estimates than the sampling design. In conclusion, studies focusing on the occurring set of vegetation types and species within a landscape may apply maximum variation sampling if the most important (environmental) gradients for the stratification are known. Studies also focusing on the abundance of vegetation types or species may apply systematic random sampling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson IL, Nelson CR, Affleck DLR (2011) Assessing the performance of sampling designs for measuring the abundance of understory plants. Ecol Appl 21:452–464
Albert CH, Yoccoz NG, Edwards TC et al (2010) Sampling in ecology and evolution—bridging the gap between theory and practice. Ecography (Cop) 33:1028–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06421.x
Allan JD (1975) Components of diversity. Oecologia 18:359–367. doi:10.1007/BF00345855
Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Ecol 9:95–99
Auestad I, Rydgren K, Økland RH (2008) Scale-dependence of vegetation-environment relationships in semi-natural grasslands. J Veg Sci 19:139–148. doi:10.3170/2007-8-18344
Austin MP, Heyligers PC (1989) Vegetation survey design for conservation: gradsect sampling of forests in North-eastern New South Wales. Biol Conserv 50:13–32
Barnett DT, Stohlgren TJ (2003) A nested-intensity design for surveying plant diversity. Biodivers Conserv 12:255–278. doi:10.1023/a:1021939010065
Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde [phytosociology: main features of vegetation science]. Springer, Wien
Bühler C, Roth T (2011) Spread of common species results in local-scale floristic homogenization in grassland of Switzerland. Divers Distrib 17:1089–1098. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00799.x
Bunce RGH, Barr CJ, Gillespie MK, Howard DC (1996) The ITE land classification: providing an environmental stratification of Great Britain. Environ Monit Assess 39:39–46. doi:10.1007/BF00396134
Chao A (1984) Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11:265–270
Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 345:101–118. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0091
Colwell RK, Hurtt GC (1994) Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoport effect. Am Nat 144:570–595. doi:10.1086/285695
Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) Statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113:791–833. doi:10.1086/283438
Diekmann M, Kühne A, Isermann M (2007) Random vs non-random sampling: effects on patterns of species abundance, species richness and vegetation-environment relationships. Folia Geobot 42:179–190. doi:10.1007/BF02893884
Drakare S, Lennon JJ, Hillebrand H (2006) The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species–area relationships. Ecol Lett 9:215–227. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00848.x
Dramstad WE, Fry G, Fjellstad WJ et al (2001) Integrating landscape-based values—Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 57:257–268. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00208-0
Gillison AN, Brewer KRW (1985) The use of gradient directed transects or gradsects in natural resource surveys. J Environ Manage 20:103–127
Gimaret-Carpentier C, Pélissier R, Pascal J-P, Houllier F (1998) Sampling strategies for the assessment of tree species diversity. J Veg Sci 9:161–172. doi:10.2307/3237115
Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ, Cooper AB, Licht DS (2012) Design and analysis of long-term ecological monitoring studies. Cambridge University Press, New York
Gleason HA (1922) On the relation between species and area. Ecology 3:158–162. doi:10.2307/1929150
Haines-Young RH, Barr CJ, Black HIJ et al. (2000) Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London
Hill D (2005) Handbook of biodiversity methods: survey, evaluation and monitoring. Cambridge University Press, New York
Hirzel A, Guisan A (2002) Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling. Ecol Modell 157:331–341. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00203-X
Hofer G, Wagner HH, Herzog F, Edwards PJ (2008) Effects of topographic variability on the scaling of plant species richness in gradient dominated landscapes. Ecography (Cop) 31:131–139. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05246.x
Homburger H, Hofer G (2012) Diversity change of mountain hay meadows in the Swiss Alps. Basic Appl Ecol 13:132–138. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2011.12.004
Jetz W, Kreft H, Ceballos G, Mutke J (2009) Global associations between terrestrial producer and vertebrate consumer diversity. Proc Biol Sci 276:269–278. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1005
Jurasinski G, Retzer V, Beierkuhnlein C (2009) Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity. Oecologia 159:15–26. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1190-z
Knollová I, Chytrý M, Tichý L, Hájek O (2005) Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative datasets for classificatino studies. J Veg Sci 16:479–486. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02388.x
Le Lay G, Engler R, Franc E, Guisan A (2010) Prospective sampling based on model ensembles improves the detection of rare species. Ecography (Cop) 33:1015–1027. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06338.x
Legendre P (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967
Lomolino MV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:3–13. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00229.x
Lyons SK, Willig MR (2002) Species richness, latitude, and scale-sensivity. Ecology 83:47–58. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0047:srlass]2.0.co;2
Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford
Magurran AE, McGill BJ (2011) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
McGarigal K, Tagil S, Cushman SA (2009) Surface metrics: an alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of landscape structure. Landsc Ecol 24:433–450. doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9327-y
Metzger MJ, Bunce RGH, Jongman RHG et al (2005) A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:549–563. doi:10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00190.x
Michalcová D, Lvončík S, Chytrý M et al (2011) Bias in vegetation databases? A comparison of stratified-random and preferential sampling. J Veg Sci 22:281–291. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01249.x
Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:867–878. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00305.x
Økland RH, Eilertsen O, Økland T (1990) On the relationship between sample plot size and beta diversity in boreal coniferous forests. Vegetatio 87:187–192. doi:10.1007/bf00042954
Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc, Newbury Park
Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proenca V et al (2010) Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century. Science 330:1496–1501. doi:10.1126/science.1196624
Rahbek C (1995) The elevational gradient of species richness - a uniform pattern. Ecography (Cop) 18:200–205. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1995.tb00341.x
Ricklefs RE (2004) A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:1–15. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x
Roleček J, Chytrý M, Hájek M et al (2007) Sampling desing in large-scale vegetation studies: do not sacrifice ecological thinking to statistical purism! Folia Geobot 42:199–208. doi:10.1007/bf02893886
Scherrer D, Körner C (2011) Topographically controlled thermal-habitat differentiation buffers alpine plant diversity against climate warming. J Biogeogr 38:406–416. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02407.x
Schlup BM, Wagner HH (2008) Effects of study design and analysis on the spatial community structure detected by multiscale ordination. J Veg Sci 19:621-U15. doi:10.3170/2008-8-18421
Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:1949. doi:10.1038/163688a0
Sorensen T (1948) A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content. K Dan Vidensk Selsk Biol Skr 5:1–34
Steinitz O, Heller J, Tsoar A et al (2006) Environment, dispersal and patterns of species similarity. J Biogeogr 33:1044–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01473.x
Straatsma G, Egli S (2012) Rarity in large data sets: singletons, modal values and the location of the species abundance distribution. Basic Appl Ecol 13:380–389. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2012.03.011
Swisstopo (2003) DHM25—Das digitale Hoehenmodell der Schweiz [DHM25—Digital terrain model of Switzerland]
Swisstopo (2009) VECTOR25—Digitales Landschaftsmodell der Schweiz [VECTOR25—Digital landscape model of Switzerland]
Thompson SK, Seber GAF (1996) Adaptive sampling. Wiley, New York
Tuomisto H (2011) Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? Yes, if we choose to use it. Oecologia 167:903–911. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2128-4
Weber D, Hintermann U, Zangger A (2004) Scale and trends in species richness: considerations for monitoring biological diversity for political purposes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:97–104. doi:10.1111/j.1466-882X.2004.00078.x
Weisberg S (1980) Applied linear regression. Wiley, New York
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Sisiyou Mountains, Orgeon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338
Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251
Whittaker RJ, Araujo MB, Paul J et al (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers Distrib 11:3–23. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00143.x
Wohlgemuth T, Nobis MP, Kienast F, Plattner M (2008) Modelling vascular plant diversity at the landscape scale using systematic samples. J Biogeogr 35:1226–1240. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01884.x
Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2001) Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 16:446–453. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02205-4
Acknowledgments
We thank Rafael Wüest and Sara Giovanettina for their help in preparing the data for the environmental stratification and the field survey. We are grateful to Willy Schmid (in memoriam), Anna Stäubli and Markus Staub, who collected the species data in the field. This study was conducted as part of the national project AlpFUTUR, which was financed by Armasuisse, the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), the Canton of Graubünden, the Ricola AG and the “Sophie und Karl Binding Stiftung.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meier, E.S., Hofer, G. Effects of plot size and their spatial arrangement on estimates of alpha, beta and gamma diversity of plants in alpine grassland. Alp Botany 126, 167–176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-016-0171-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-016-0171-9