Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fish feeding groups, food selectivity, and diet shifts associated with environmental factors and prey availability along a large subtropical river, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding spatial variation in fish trophic structures along large river systems remains a challenge, and the influence of fish food selectivity and diet shifts on these structures remains unknown. In this study, the assemblage composition and stomach contents of fish in the subtropical East River of southern China were analyzed to determine their diet composition (DC) and identify prey-oriented feeding groups. Ten prey items were identified and used to cluster 106 fish species into 23 feeding groups. The number of groups increased longitudinally due to the accumulated emergence of site-specific prey sources in fish DC, although this number decreased sharply near the estuary due to the loss of insectivorous fish. The fish assemblages showed a longitudinal decrease in abundance and an increase in biomass, with higher values observed in the rainy season than the dry season. A downstream decrease in insectivores and epiphytivores and increase in detritivores and molluscivores represented the basic patterns observed along the river. Seven widespread fish species exhibited spatial dietary shifts, among which three generalist feeders with a high abundance notably influenced the fish trophic structures, and four specialist feeders with high food selectivity were significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with prey availability. Multivariate data analysis showed that the flow velocity, water depth, riffle areas, and nutrient concentrations were the key environmental factors that determined the distribution of fish feeding groups, while hydrophytes, plant debris, Ephemeroptera and Odonata insects, and Atyidae shrimp were the key prey sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Methods for collecting and analyzing the water, plankton, and epiphyte samples (Method S1). Taxonomic classification of ten fish prey items in the East River (Table S1). Composition of fish species, feeding groups, and stomach contents at the six sampling sites along the East River (Table S2). Linear regressions between the distribution of fish specialist feeders and the biomass of prey sources (Fig. S1). CCA results between the biomass distribution of fish feeding groups and the key prey sources (Fig. S2A) and the environmental factors (Fig. S2B).

References

  • Aarts BW, Nienhuis P (2003) Fish zonations and guilds as the basis for assessment of ecological integrity of large rivers. Hydrobiologia 500:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adite A, Winemiller KO (1997) Trophic ecology and ecomorphology of fish assemblages in coastal lakes of Benin, West Africa. Ecoscience 4:6–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandre C, Esteves K, De Moura E, Mello M (2010) Analysis of fish communities along a rural–urban gradient in a neotropical stream (Piracicaba River Basin, São Paulo, Brazil). Hydrobiologia 641:97–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier PL, Karr JR (1983) Fish communities along environmental gradients in a system of tropical streams. Environ Biol Fishes 9:117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier PL, Winston MR (1999) Characterizing fish community diversity across Virginia landscapes: prerequisite for conservation. Ecol Appl 9:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker R, Buckland A, Sheaves M (2014) Fish gut content analysis: robust measures of diet composition. Fish Fish 15:170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder B, Stribling J (1999) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers. USEPA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Böet P, Belliard J (1999) Multiple human impacts by the City of Paris on fish communities in the Seine river basin, France. Hydrobiologia 410:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyero L, Ramirez A, Dudgeon D, Pearson RG (2009) Are tropical streams really different? J N Am Benthol Soc 28:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bren L (1993) Riparian zone, stream, and floodplain issues: a review. J Hydrol 150:277–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchheister A, Latour RJ (2015) Diets and trophic-guild structure of a diverse fish assemblage in Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A. J Fish Biol 86:967–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland A, Baker R, Loneragan N, Sheaves M (2017) Standardising fish stomach content analysis: the importance of prey condition. Fish Res 196:126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton GW, Odum EP (1945) The distribution of stream fish in the vicinity of Mountain Lake, Virginia. Ecology 26:182–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson J (1978) Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM (1983) Adaptive flexibility in the foraging behavior of fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D, Cheung FK, Mantel SK (2010) Foodweb structure in small streams: do we need different models for the tropics? J N Am Benthol Soc 29:395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Torgersen CE, Baxter CV, Li HW (2002) Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream Fishes. Bioscience 52:483–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flecker AS (1992) Fish trophic guilds and the stucture of a tropical stream: weak direct vs. strong indirect effects. Ecology 73:927–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flecker AS (1997) Habitat modification by tropical fishes: environmental heterogeneity and the variability of interaction strength. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flecker AS, Taylor BW (2004) Tropical fishes as biological bulldozers: density effects on resource heterogeneity and species diversity. Ecology 85:2267–2278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flotemersch JE, Stribling JB, Paul MJ (2006) Concepts and approaches for the bioassessment of non-wadeable streams and rivers. Office of Research and Development, USEPA, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco A, Elliott M, Franzoi P, Torricelli P (2008) Life strategies of fishes in European estuaries: the functional guild approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 354:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlan N, Esteves KE, Quináglia GA (2013) Environmental factors associated with fish distribution in an urban neotropical river (Upper Tietê River Basin, São Paulo, Brazil). Environ Biol Fishes 96:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein RM, Meador MR (2004) Comparisons of fish species traits from small streams to large rivers. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:971–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB (1988) Feeding dynamics, nitrogen budgets, and ecosystem role of a desert stream omnivore, Agosia chrysogaster (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Environ Biol Fishes 21:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu B, Hoyer MV (1997) Intrapopulation feeding diversity in blue tilapia: evidence from stable-isotope analyses. Ecology 78:2263–2266

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (2007) Methods in stream ecology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellawell J, Abel R (1971) A rapid volumetric method for the analysis of the food of fishes. J Fish Biol 3:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho KC, Chow YL, Yau JTS (2003) Chemical and microbiological qualities of The East River (Dongjiang) water, with particular reference to drinking water supply in Hong Kong. Chemosphere 52:1441–1450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeinghaus DJ, Winemiller KO, Taphorn DC (2004) Compositional change in fish assemblages along the Andean piedmont-Llanos floodplain gradient of the río Portuguesa, Venezuela. Neotrop Ichthyol 2:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeinghaus DJ, Winemiller KO, Birnbaum JS (2007) Local and regional determinants of stream fish assemblage structure: inferences based on taxonomic vs. functional groups. J Biogeogr 34:324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz RJ (1978) Temporal variability patterns and the distributional patterns of stream fishes. Ecol Monogr 48:307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huet M (1959) Profiles and biology of western European streams as related to fish management. Trans Am Fish Soc 88:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop E (1980) Stomach contents analysis—a review of methods and their application. J Fish Biol 17:411–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibanez C, Oberdorff T, Teugels G et al (2007) Fish assemblages structure and function along environmental gradients in rivers of Gabon (Africa). Ecol Freshw Fish 16:315–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibañez C, Belliard J, Hughes RM et al (2009) Convergence of temperate and tropical stream fish assemblages. Ecography 32:658–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen D, Cressa C, Mathooko JM, Dudgeon D (2008) Macroinvertebrates: composition, life histories and production. In: Dudgeon D (ed) Tropical stream ecology. Elsevier, Atlanta, pp 65–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JHW, Wang ZY, Thoe W, Cheng DS (2007) Integrated physical and ecological management of the East River. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 7:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgarvey DJ (2014) Moving beyond species-discharge relationships to a flow-mediated, macroecological theory of fish species richness. Freshw Sci 33:18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miltner RJ (1998) Primary nutrients and the biotic integrity of rivers and streams. Freshw Biol 40:145–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB, Senayake FR (1984) Resource partitioning among the fishes of rainforest streams in Sri Lanka. J Zool 202:195–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobriga ML, Feyrer F (2008) Diet composition in San Francisco Estuary striped bass: does trophic adaptability have its limits? Environ Biol Fishes 83:495–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osmundson D, Ryel RJ, Lamarra V, Pitlick J (2002) Flow-sediment-biota relations: implications for river regulation effects on native fish abundance. Ecol Appl 12:1719–1739

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres-Neto P, Bizerril P, Iglesias R (1995) An overview of some aspects of river ecology: a case study on fish assemblages distribution in an eastern Brazilian coastal river. Oecol Aust 1:317–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry A, Schulz U (2006) Longitudinal changes and indicator species of the fish fauna in the subtropical Sinos River, Brazil. J Fish Biol 69:272–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD (1995) Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76:606–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouilly M, Barrera S, Rosales C (2006) Changes of taxonomic and trophic structure of fish assemblages along an environmental gradient in the Upper Beni watershed (Bolivia). J Fish Biol 68:137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey BJ, Arthington AH (2003) Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review. Mar Freshw Res 54:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ, Hubert WA (1991) Fish assemblages and habitat gradients in a Rocky Mountain–Great Plains stream: biotic zonation and additive patterns of community change. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1991) Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. Bioscience 41:704–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seegert G, Vondruska J, Perry E, Dixon D (2013) Longitudinal variation in the Ohio River fish community. N Am J Fish Manag 33:539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon AL (1968) Species diversity and longitudinal succession in stream fishes. Ecology 49:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.rproject.org/

  • Thorp JH, Thoms MC, Delong MD (2006) The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Res Appl 22:123–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Dolédec S, Norris R et al (2003) The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshw Biol 48:768–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW et al (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Robertson DM, Garrison PJ (2007) Linkages between nutrients and assemblages of macroinvertebrates and fish in wadeable streams: implication to nutrient criteria development. Environ Manag 39:194–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Wang L, Chang HY, Li F, Tang JP, Zhou XA, Li X, Tian SM, Lin HJ, Yang Y (2018) Longitudinal variation in energy flow networks along a large subtropical river, China. Ecol Model 2:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J, Tockner K, Schiemer F (1999) Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. River Res Appl 15:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff LL, Carniatto N, Hahn NS (2013) Longitudinal use of feeding resources and distribution of fish trophic guilds in a coastal Atlantic stream, southern Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 11:375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was financially supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. U1501235 and U1405234) and Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (no. 201704020158). We thank Nora F. Y. Tam for fruitful discussions and comments on earlier versions of this manuscript and anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SW, JPT, TTW, LW, JJF, and HYC initiated the study and carried out the fieldwork and species determination. SW, JPT, and LHS carried out the statistical analysis, prepared the diagrams, and wrote the manuscript. YY and HJL revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests. The study did not involve work with humans. All authors have approved the manuscript and agree to its submission.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 816 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Tang, JP., Su, LH. et al. Fish feeding groups, food selectivity, and diet shifts associated with environmental factors and prey availability along a large subtropical river, China. Aquat Sci 81, 31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0628-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0628-1

Keywords

Navigation