Skip to main content
Log in

Sequential Analyses, Multiple Controlling Stimuli, and Temporal Patterning in First-Language Transmission

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although inferences of causality from contingencies are problematic, as Hume argued, and are difficult to prove empirically, explanatory accounts of normal language acquisition and all remedial interventions rely on presumptions of environmental effectiveness. Careful sequential analyses of verbal behaviors can strongly corroborate dependencies by means of establishing either (a) contiguous contingencies or (b) topographical resemblances between antecedents and delayed consequences that could not be explained without assuming such dependencies. The promises, as well as the methodological and conceptual challenges, of such sequential analyses of verbal training and learning are exemplified on the basis of mother—child interactions. Concomitant variation over shorter and longer intervals, and immediate as well as lagged contingencies, are interpreted as indicators of dependency relationships. By focusing on behavioral evidence, extensive similarities or even homologies between firstlanguage training and learning and basic behavioral principles established mostly through nonhuman research can be demonstrated. Nevertheless, expansions and innovations in the behavioral repertoire are suggested as conducive to mutual enrichment of the two fields of the experimental analysis of behavior and first-language acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakeman, R. (1978). Untangling streams of behavior: Sequential analyses of observation data. In G. P. Sackett (Ed.), Observing behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 63–78). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction. An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 533–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Bellugi, U. (1964). Three processes in the child’s acquisition of syntax. Harvard Educational Review, 34, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Cazden, C., & Bellugi, U. (1968). The child’s grammar from I to Ill. In J. P. Hill (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 28–73). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk. Learning to use language. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. A., & Jaynes, J. (1966). Reinstatement. Psychological Review, 73, 478–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980). On cognitive structures and their development: A reply to Piaget. In M. Piatelli-Palmerini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 35–52). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1978). On the organization and core concepts of learning theory and cognitive psychology. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 6, pp. 235–292). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herder, J. G. (1969). J. G. Herder on social and political culture. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. M. (1965). Intrinsic motivation and its role in psychological development. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp.189–282). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structural barrier. Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R., & Hagen, J. W. (1982). Memory in childhood. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 350–366). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattal, K. A. (1995). Contingency and behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 209–224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1978). Determiners and consequences of verbal behaviors of young children and their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 14, 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1980). Relationships between parental input frequencies and children’s language acquisition: A reanalysis of Brown’s data. Journal of Child Language, 7, 105–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1983a). A behavioral analysis of controversial topics in first language acquisition: Reinforcements, corrections, modeling, input frequencies, and the threeterm contingency pattern. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1983b). The mother of Eve as a first language teacher. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1985). Analytic, synthetic, abstracting, and word-class defining aspects of verbal mother-child interactions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1992). A first language taught and learned. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1994). Corrections in first language acquisition: Theoretical controversies and factual evidence. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1996). Input and learning processes in first language acquisition. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 182–228). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (in press). The guided acquisition of first language skills. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

  • Mowrer, O. H. (1958). Hearing and speaking: An analysis of language learning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 23, 143–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, G. (1996). Developmental psychology: Dynamical systems and behavior analysis. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razran, G. (1961). The observable unconscious and the inferable conscious in current Soviet psychophysiology: Interoceptive conditioning, semantic conditioning, and the orienting reflex. Psychological Review, 68, 81–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., & Gardner, W. (1984). Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 95–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondal, J. A. (1979). “Maman est au courant”: Une etude des connaissances maternelles quant aux aspects formels du langage du jeune enfant. Enfance, 2, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, G. P. (1987). Analysis of sequential interaction data: Some issues, recent developments, and a causal inference model. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 855–878). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D. (1992). Theory in behavior analysis. An application to child development. American Psychologist, 47, 1396–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D. (1995). A behavior analytic view of child development. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, G. L., & Baer, D. M. (1972). Effects of concurrent and serial training on generalized vocal imitation in retarded children. Developmental Psychology, 11, 763–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1978). Information processing theory of human problem solving. In N. S. Endler, L. R. Boulter, & H. Osser (Eds.), Contemporary issues in developmental psychology (pp. 437–444). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. E, & Kaiser, A. P. (1986). Incidental language teaching: A critical review. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 291–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, K. (1981). Some issues in the theory of learnability. In C. L. Baker & J. J. Mc-Carthy (Eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 30–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst L. Moerk.

Additional information

Parts of this paper were presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, May 1998, as a contribution to a symposium on Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Verbal Behavior, organized by Sam Leigland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moerk, E.L. Sequential Analyses, Multiple Controlling Stimuli, and Temporal Patterning in First-Language Transmission. Analysis Verbal Behav 16, 63–80 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392949

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392949

Navigation