Skip to main content
Log in

Cytological studies in cotton

III. A hybrid betweenGossypium Davidsonii Kell. andG. Sturtii F. Muell

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1.Gossypium Davidsonii (n = 13), a wild species from California, has smaller chromosomes thanG. Sturtii (n = 13), a wild species from Australia. This difference in chromosome size is maintained in the hybrid, and enables a distinction between the paternal and the maternal chromosomes to be made.

2. The chromosome pairing in the hybrid is incomplete, but allosyndesis takes place about nine times more often than autosyndesis. Univalents are just as frequent between the small chromosomes fromG. Davidsonii, as between the larger chromosomes fromG. Sturtii.

3. The chiasma frequency is the same in the pure species despite the difference in chromosome size. Contrasted with the pure species, the chiasma frequency in the hybrid is significantly smaller in the bivalents containing aDavidsonii and aSturtii chromosome.

4. The difference in the size of the chromosomes of the species under observation is in all probability neither the result of genetic factors, nor associated with a difference in pairing blocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avery, P. (1930). “Cytological studies of five interspecific hybrids ofCrepis Leontodontoides.”Univ. Calif. Publ. agric. Sci.6, 135–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, K. H. von (1931). “Autosyndese inAegilops triuncialis L. ×Secale cereale L.”Z. Zücht. A17, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. (1932a). “The control of the chromosomes by the genotype and its bearing on some evolutionary problems.”Amer. Nat.66, 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -- (1932b).Recent Advances in Cytology. 559 pp. London.

  • Harland, S. C. (1928). “Cotton notes.”Trop. Agriculture, Trin.,5, 200–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. (1929). “A suggested method for the control of certain bollworms in cotton.”Emp. Cott. Gr. Rev.6, 333–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1932). “The genetics ofGossypium.”Bibliogr. genet. 9, 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, S. C. andAtteck, O. S. (1931). “Intergeneric hybrids betweenGossypium andThurberia.”Amer. Nat.65, 380–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihara, H. andLilienfeld, F. (1932). “Untersuchungen anAegilops ×Triticum-undAegilops-Aegilops-Bastarden.”Cytologia,3, 384–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewitsky, G. A. (1931). “An essay on cytological analysis of the fixing action of the chrom-acetic formalin and the chromic-formalin.”Bull. Appl. Bot. and Plant Breed.27, 181–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, A. E. (1933). “Chromosomes inGossypium and related genera.”J. agric. Res.46, 217–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurman, O. (1928). “Cytological studies in the genusRibes L.”Hereditas,11, 289–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsted, A. (1929). “Cytological investigations of the genusAesculus L.” Ibid.12, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (1933). “Cytological studies in cotton. I. The mitosis and the meiosis in diploid and triploid Asiatic cotton.”Ann. Bot., Lond.,47, 227–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1934). “Cytological studies in cotton. II. Two interspecific hybrids between Asiatic and New World cottons.”J. Genet. 28, 407–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skovsted, A. Cytological studies in cotton. Journ. of Genetics 30, 397–405 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982248

Keywords

Navigation