Abstract
Two experiments are reported which examined the influence of context on face recognition accuracy for novel and familiar faces respectively. Context was manipulated by varying the physical background against which the faces appeared. In Experiment I, 80 student subjects observed 18 faces before attempting to recognize them in a sequence of 36 alternatives. For half the subjects, the backgrounds changed from study to test, while for the remainder they stayed the same. In addition, for half the subjects, both the pose and expression of the face also changed, while for the others it remained constant. Changes in pose plus expression and context significantly reduced recognition accuracy for the target faces. Experiment II used an identical design, except that the faces of celebrities replaced the novel faces. The influence of context was eliminated but the effects of pose and expression were maintained. However, when only faces which were actually identified by subjects were considered, the effects of pose and expression, too, were eliminated. The significance of these findings for theories of contextual memory are discussed.
References
Baddeley, A. & Woodhead, M. (1982). Depth of processing, context and face recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 148–164.
Bilodeau, I.M. & Schlosberg, H. (1951). Similarity in stimulating conditions as a variable in retro-active inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 199–204.
Bower, G.H. & Karlin M.B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 751–757.
Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K. & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of the encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311–318.
Bruce, V.G. (1979). Searching for politicians: an information processing approach to face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 373–379.
Bruce, V.G. (1982). Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105–116.
Davies, C.M. (1982). Representing the Appearance of a ‘Wanted’ Suspect: Realism versus Simplicity. Paper presented to the Law and Psychology Conference, Swansea, Wales.
Daw, P.S. & Parkin, A.J. (1981). Observations on the efficiency of two different processing strategies for remembering faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 55, 351–355.
Eich, J.E. (1980). The cue dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 8, 157–173.
Ellis, H.D. (1981). Theoretical aspects of face recognition. In G.M. Davies, H.D. Ellis & J.W. Shepherd (eds.), Perceiving and Remembering Faces. pp. 171–200. London: Academic Press.
Ellis, H.D. & Deregowski, J.B. (1981). Within-race and between-race recognition of transformed and untransformed faces. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 27–35.
Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W. & Davies, G.M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431–439.
Goldstein, A.G. (1977). The fallibility of the eyewitness: psychological evidence. In B.D. Sales (ed.), Psychology in the Legal Process. pp. 223–247. New York: Spectrum.
Goldstein, A.G. & Chance, J. (1981). Laboratory studies of face recognition. In G.M. Davies, H.D. Ellis & J.W. Shepherd (eds.)) Perceiving and Remembering Faces. pp. 81–104. London: Academic Press.
Klee, M., Leseaux, M., Malai, C. & Tiberghien, G. (1982). Nouveaux effets de contexte dans la reconnaissance de visages non familiers. Revue de Psychologie Appliquée, 32, 109–119.
Mandler, G. (1972). Organisation and recognition. In E. Tuiving & W. Donaldson (eds.), Organisation of Memory. pp. 146–167. New York: Academic Press.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing- the judgement of previous occurrence. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 252–271.
McGeoch, J.A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse. Psychological Review, 39, 352–370.
Penrod, S., Loftus, E. & Winkler, J. (1982), The reliability of eyewitness testimony: a psychological perspective. In N.L. Kerr & R.M. Bray (eds.), The Psychology of the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Rae, G. (1976). A non-parametric measure of recognition performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 98.
Reed, H.J. (1931). The influence of change of conditions upon the amount recalled. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 632–649.
Smith, S.M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 460–471.
Smith, S.M., Glenberg, A. & Bjork, R.A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory and Cognition, 6, 342–353.
Thomson, D.M. (1972). Context effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 497–511.
Thomson, D.M., Robertson, S.L. & Vogt, R. (1982). Person recognition: the effect of context. Human Learning, 1, 137–154.
Tiberghien, G. (1980). Reconnaissance à long terme: comment chercher? Bulletin de Psychologie, 33, 813–830.
Tulving, E. & Thomson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 353–370.
Wagstaff, G.F. (1982). Context Effects in Eyewitness Reports. Paper presented to the Law and Psychology Conference, Swansea, Wales.
Walker-Smith, G.L. (1980). Memorizing facial identity, expression and orientation. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 415–424.
Watkins, M.J., Ho, E. & Tuiving, E. (1976). Context effects in recognition memory for faces. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 15, 505–517.
Winograd, E. & Rivers-Bulkeley, N.T. (1977). Effects of changing context on remembering faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 397–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davies, G., Milne, A. Recognizing faces in and out of context. Current Psychological Reviews 2, 235–246 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979300
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979300