Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the herbicide ametryn on cellulose-deeomposing fungi in Egyptian soil

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ametryn exerted a depressive effect on the total count of cellulose-decomposing fungi after 1 and 3 weeks of treatment with a high dose (54 mg active ingredient per kg dry soil), and 5 weeks after treatment with medium (27 mg) and high doses. This inhibitory effect was alleviated after 8 weeks, while after 12 weeks it was changed into promotion by a low dose (5.4 mg). When incorporated in the agar medium, this herbicide was toxic to the total count and to the counts of almost all fungal genera and species at the three doses (25, 125, 250 ppm). The decomposition of ametryn-treated calico buried in untreated soil was significantly and regularly inhibited by medium and high doses after all experimental periods. The growth and sporulation of test fungal species were partially or completely inhibited by the three doses, except,Aspergillus niger, Chaetomium globosum, andGliocladium roseum which were not affected by the low dose

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Mallek A.Y.: Effect of some pesticides on cellulose-decomposing fungi in Egyptian soil.PhD Thesis, Botany Department, Faculty of Sciences, Assiut University, Assiut (Egypt) 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J.R.: Pesticide effects on non-target soil microorganisms, p. 313 inPesticide Microbiology. Microbiological Aspects of Pesticide Behaviour in the Environment (I.R. Hill, S.J.L. Wright, Eds). Academie Press, London—New York—San Francisco 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goguadze V.D., Gogiya L.N.: The effect of herbicide on the development of soil microflora in cinnamon alluvial-skeletal soils of Abkhaziya.Subtrop. Kul’tury 4, 161–167 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard E., Wingfield G.I.: Techniques for the assay of effects of herbicides on the soil microflora. II. The effect of herbicides on cellulose decomposition, inSome Methods for Microbiological Assay (R.G. Board, D.W. Lovelock, Eds).Soc. Appl. Bact. Tech. Ser. 8, 236 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husarova M.: Microflora in the rhizosphere of maize: Perennial effect of herbicides.Ved.Pr. Výzk.Úst.Kukur.Trnava 6, 45–69 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeater R.S.L., Mcllvenny H.C.: Direct drilling of cereals after use of Paraquat.Weed Res. 5, 311 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L.F., Curl E.A., Bond J.H., Fribourg H.A.:Methods for Studying Soil Microflora—Plant Disease Relationships. Burgess Publ. Co., Minneapolis 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazabeva N.V., Blokhin V.G.: The effect of Prometryne, Falone and Alipur on the soil microflora.Khimiya sel’khoz. 7, 609 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies J.D.: A dipper technique for serial dilutions of soil for microbial analy sis.Proc. Soil Soc. Amer. 21, 660 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Migev N., Bubalov M.: The effect of some herbicides on the soil and rhizosphere microflora of wheat cv. Mara.Godisen Zb. Zemjod. Sum. Fak. Univ. Skopje 21, 13–20 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickovski M.D.: Effects of the herbicides Gesaran 2079, Lumeton 2412 and Igran 1866 on the microflora of soil.Ann. Fac. Agric. Univ. Skopje 20, 43–54 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore F.J., Thurston J.M.: Interrelationships of fungi, weeds, crops and herbicides.Proc. 10th Brit. Weed Control Conf. 3, 920 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepomiluev V.F., Kuzyakina T.I.: The effect of Atrazine and Simazine on soil fungi and herbicide decomposition in the soil.Biol. Nauki 15, 127–131 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nepomiluev V.F., Bebin S.I., Kuzyakina T.I.: The effect of herbicides on the microflora of a sod-podzol soil under field bean.Izv. Timiryazev Sel’khoz. Akad. 4, 88–94 (1966a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepomiluev V.F., Grechin I.P., Kuzvakika T.I.: The effect of Simazine on microflora and microbiological activity of a sod-podzol soil with different methods of treatment.Izv. Timiryazev Sel’khoz. Akad. 2, 128–136 (1966b).

    Google Scholar 

  • PraNaiteNe E.V.: The effect of different cultivation treatments and herbicides on the soil microflora.Mat. Pribalt. Sov. Zashch. Rast. Elgava 8–12 (1970).

  • Prozorova M.I.: The effect of Atrazine on the biological activity and microflora of a forest soil.Izv. Sib. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSSR 5, 32–35 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon L.: Effect of herbicides on microorganisms.Folia Microbiol. 16, 516 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith N.R., Dawsok V.T.: The bacteriostatic action of rose bengal in media used for the plate counts of soil fungi.Soil Sci. 58, 467–471 (1944).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SobieszczaNski J.: The influence of different herbicides upon the growth and development of cellulolytic microorganisms.Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris)115, 613–616 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szegi J.: Effect of a few herbieides on thp decomposition of cellulose.Symp. Biol. Hung. 11, 349–354 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Torstensson L.: Effects of MCPA, 2,4,5-T, Linuron and Simazine on some functional groups of soil microorganisms.Swedish J. Agric. Res. 4, 151–160 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tulabaev B.D., Azimbegov N.: The effect of triazine and urea derivatives on soil microflora.Khimiya sel’khoz. 5, 43–44 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voets J.P., Meerschman M., Vestkaete W.: Soil microbiological and biochemical effects of long term Atrazine applications.Soil Biol. Biochem. 6, 149–152 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdel-Mallek, A.Y., Moharram, A.M. Effect of the herbicide ametryn on cellulose-deeomposing fungi in Egyptian soil. Folia Microbiol. 31, 375–381 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936602

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936602

Keywords

Navigation