This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Adams S., Vinkenoog R., Spielman M., Dickinson H. G. and Scott R. J. 2000 Parent-of origin effects on seed development inArabidopsis thaliana require DNA methylation.Development 127, 2493–2502.
Bañuelos M. J. and Obeso J. R. 2003 Maternal provisioning, sibling rivalry and seed mass variability in the dioecious shrubRhamnus alpinus.Evol. Ecol. 17, 19–31.
Bond W. J. and Maze K. E. 1999 Survival costs and reproductive benefits of floral display in a sexually dimorphic dioecious shrub,Leucadendron xanthoconus.Evol. Ecol. 13, 1–8.
Bond W. J. and Midgley J. 1988 Allometry and sexual differences in leaf size.Am. Nat. 131, 901–910.
Brandvain Y. and Haig D. 2005 Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants.Am. Nat. 166, 330–338.
Calsbeek R. and Sinervo B. 2004 Within-clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: cryptic mate choice in the wild.J. Evol. Biol. 17, 464–470.
Chapman T., Arnqvist G., Bangham J. and Rowe L. 2003 Sexual conflict.Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 41–47.
Charlesworth D. 2002 Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes.Heredity 88, 94–101.
Chippindale A. K., Gibson J. R. and Rice W. R. 2001 Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1671–1675.
Day T. and Bonduriansky R. 2004 Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.Genetics 167, 1537- 1546.
Delph L. F., Knapczyk E N. and Taylor D. R. 2002 Amongpopulation variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traitsin Silene latifolia.J. Evol. Biol. 15, 1011–1020.
Delph L. F., Gehring J. L., Frey F. M., Arntz A. M. and Levri M. 2004 Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection.Evolution 58, 1936- 1946.
Delph L. F., Gehring J. L., Arntz A. M., Levri M. and Frey F. M. 2005 Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction.Am. Nat. 166, S31-S41.
Gibson J. R., Chippindale A. K. and Rice W. R. 2002 The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation.Proc. R. Soc. London B269, 499–505.
Haig D. and Westoby M. 1991 Genomic imprinting in endosperm: its effect on seed development in crosses between species and between different ploidies of the same species and its implications for the evolution of apomixis.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B333, 1–14.
Haig D. and Wilczek A. 2006 Sexual conflict and the alternation of haploid and diploid generations.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B361, 335–343.
Holland B. and Rice W. R. 1998 Chase-away sexual selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance.Evolution 52, 1–7
Kohorn L. U. 1994 Shoot morphology and reproduction in jojoba: advantages of sexual dimorphism.Ecology 75, 2384–2394.
Meagher T. R. 1994 The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism inSilene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). 2. Response to sex-specific selection.Evolution 48, 939–951.
Murphy C. G. 1998 Interaction-independent sexual selection and the mechanisms of sexual selection.Evolution 52, 8–18.
Rice W. R. 1984 Sex-chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.Evolution 38, 735–742.
Rice W. R. and Chippindale A. K. 2001 Intersexual ontogenetic conflict.J. Evol. Biol. 14, 685–693.
Scott R. J., Spielman M., Bailey J. and Dickinson H. G. 1998 Parent-of-origin effects on seed development inArabidopsis thaliana.Development 125, 3329–3341.
Uma Shaanker R. and Ganeshaiah K. N. 1997 Conflict between parents and offspring in plants: predictions, processes and evolutionary consequences.Curr. Sci. 72, 932–939.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prasad, N.G., Bedhomme, S. Sexual conflict in plants. J. Genet. 85, 161–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02935325
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02935325