Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of two strengths of iohexol and iothalamate in urography

  • Published:
Urologic radiology

Abstract

Iohexol and iothalamate were studied in 2 strengths and compared with results from a previous trial of Iopamidol and 4 ionic agents. Scoring was consistent from trial to trial.

No worthwhile increase in density was achieved at high doses using nonionics and pyelographic distention was less than for ionic media. The timing of the nephrogram was the same for ionics and nonionics. There is no need to adopt a different film sequence for nonionic media.

Urticarial reactions were identical for all 4 media studied in this trial.

Nonionic media perform as well as other media; at lower doses they are much better than meglumine salts of ionic media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies P, Panto PN, Buckley J, Richardson RE: The old and the new: a study of five contrast media for urography.Br J Radiol 58:593–597, 1985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Panto PN, Davies P: Delayed reactions to urographic contrast media.Br J Radiol 59:41–44, 1986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cueff J, Pinet A: Clinical trial of a new non-ionic contrast medium (Iopamidol) in intravenous urography. Thesis, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France, 1979

  4. Benness GT: Urographic contrast agents: a comparison of sodium and methyl glucamine salts.Clin Radiol 21:150–156, 1970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taenzer V, Heep M, Clauss W: Urography with non-ionic contrast media. In Taenzer V, Seither E (eds):Contrast Media. Stuttgart: George Thiene Verlag, 1983, pp 148–152

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rankin RN, Eng FWHT: Iohexol vs diatrizoate. A comparative study in intravenous urography.Invest Radiol 20 (Suppl): S112-S114, 1985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dawson P, Herm L, Marshall J: Intravenous urography with low osmolality contrast agents: theoretical considerations and clinical findings.Clin Radiol 35:1973–1975, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levorstad K, Kolbenstreet A, Sommerfelt SC, Zackinssen BE, Jagenburge R, Egebhad M, Thrane-Neilsen W, Sjoberg S, Oldbring J, Sveen K: Tolerability and diagnostic usefulness of iohexol in urography. An open multi-centre clinical trial.Acta Radiol Diagn 23:491–496, 1982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Arkless R: The normal kidneys reaction to intravenous pyelography.Am J Roentgenol 107:746–749, 1969

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, P., Glaves, J., Panto, P. et al. Comparison of two strengths of iohexol and iothalamate in urography. Urol Radiol 9, 30–35 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932624

Key words

Navigation