Abstract
In an inner dune area in the Dutch coastal dunes several artificially stabilized blowouts were reactivated. The purpose was to investigate whether these reactivated blowouts could remain active despite the increased atmospheric deposition of nutrients, how much area would be affected by sand from the blowouts, whether the vegetation would respond to the deposition of sand, and whether the reactivation of blowouts could be a measure against the effects of acidification and eutrophication.
This paper presents the results of the first years of minitoring the changes in the blowout morphology and the response of the vegetation. In the monitoring period (1991–1994) the blowouts remained active and grew slowly in size and depth. The area which receives more than 1 cm of calcareous sand from the blowout in three years was up to six times the area of the blowouts. Moss vegetation responded to the accumulation of sand:Campylopus introflexus was sparse within the deposition area whereasTortula ruralis was found near the contour of 1 cm deposition in 3 yr. No indications were found that shrubs or marram grass were adversely affected by the deposition of sand.
The experiment forms part of a programme to test measures aimed at mitigating the effects of air pollution on natural landscapes. From the viewpoint of the programme the experiment is a success.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon. 1993–1994.Wet op de waterkering, Gewijzigd voorstel van Wet. Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag.
Anon. 1994.Natuurlijke dynamiek in de zeereep; een onderzoek naar de mogelijkheden op vier lokaties. Report Dienst Weg en Waterbouwkunde, Rijkswaterstaat, Den Haag.
Anon. 1995.Basisrapport zandige kust, behorende bij de leidraad zandige kust. Technische Adviescommissie voor de Waterkeringen, Delft.
Arens, S.M., van Kaam-Peters, H.M.E. & van Boxel, J.H. 1995. Air flow over foredunes and implications for sand transport.Earth Surface Proces. Landforms 20: 315–332.
Jungerius, P.D. & de Jong, J.H. 1989. Variability of water repellence in the dunes along the Dutch coast.Catena 16: 491–497.
Jungerius, P.D. & van der Meulen, F. 1988. Erosion processes in a dune landscape along the Dutch coast.Catena 15: 217–228.
Jungerius, P.D. & van der Meulen, F. 1989. The development of dune blowouts as measured with erosion pins and sequential air photos.Catena 16: 369–376.
Jungerius, P.D., Verheggen, J.T. & Wiggers, A.J. 1981. The development of blowouts in ‘De Blink’, a coastal dune area near Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.Earth Surface Process. Landforms 6: 375–396.
Pluis, J.L.A. & van Boxel, J.H. 1993. Wind velocity and algal crusts in dune blowouts.Catena 20: 581–594.
Stolk, R. & Ettersbank, G. 1987. Calculating the area of an irregular shape.Byte 1987: 135–136.
van der Meulen, F., Kooijman, A. M., Veer, M. A. C. & van Boxel, J. H. 1996.Effectgerichte maatregelen tegen verzuring en eutrofiering in open droge duinen, Eindrapport fase 1, 1991–1995 (Measures against the effects of acidification and eutrophication in open dry dunes, Final report phase 1, 1991–1995). Department of Physical Geography and Soil Science, University of Amsterdam.
van der Putten, W.H. 1989.Establishment, growth and degeneration of Ammophila arenaria in coastal sand dunes. Doctoral Thesis Agricultural University Wageningen.
van der Putten, W.H. & Peters, B.A.M. 1995. Possibilities for management of coastal foredunes with deteriorated stands ofAmmophila arenaria (marram grass).J. Coastal Conserv. 1: 29–39.
Wartena, L., van Boxel, J.H. & Veenhuysen, D. 1991. Macroclimate, microclimate and dune formation along the West European coats.Landscape Ecol. 6: 15–26.
Wieringa, J. & Rijkoort, P.J. 1981.Klimaat van Nederland 2; Windklimaat van Nederland. Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut. Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Boxel, J.H., Jungerius, P.D., Kieffer, N. et al. Ecological effects of reactivation of artificially stabilized blowouts in coastal dunes. J Coast Conserv 3, 57–62 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908179
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908179