Abstract
We assume that great and moderate Himalayan earthquakes occur through reactivation of subhorizontal thrust faults by frictional failure under the action of stresses induced by Himalayan topography, isostasy related buoyancy forces, crustal overburden and plate tectonic causes. Estimates of stresses are based on two dimensional plane strain calculations using analytical formulae of elasticity theory and rock mechanics under suitable simplifying assumptions. Considerable attention is focussed on a point on the detachment at a depth of 17 km below mean sea level under the surface trace of the Main Central Thrust (MCT). According to recent views, great Himalayan earthquakes should nucleate in the detachment in the vicinity of such a point. Also many moderate earthquakes occur on the detachment similarly under the MCT. Vertical and horizontal normal stresses of 622 and 262 MPa and a corresponding shear stress of 26 MPa are estimated for this point due to topography, buoyancy and overburden. For fault friction coefficient varying between 0.3 to 1.0, estimates of plate tectonic stress required are in the range of 386 to 434 MPa, when the cumulative principal stresses are oriented favourably for reactivation of the detachment. Estimates of shear stress mobilized at the same point would be from 27 to 32 MPa for the identical range of fault friction coefficient. Our calculations suggest that presence of pore water in the fault zones is essential for reactivation. Pore pressure required is between 535 to 595 MPa for friction coefficient in the range of 0.3 to 1.0 and it is less than lithostatic stress of 603 MPa at the above point. For the specific nominal value of 0.65 for fault friction coefficient, the estimated values of plate tectonic stress, shear stress and pore pressure at the above point on the detachment are 410 MPa, 30 MPa and 580 MPa respectively. Similar estimates are obtained also for shallower points on the detachment up to the southern limit of the Outer Himalaya. Our estimates of the plate tectonic stress, shear stress and pore pressure for reactivation of upper crustal thrust faults compare favourably with those quoted in the literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anooshehpoor A and Brune J N 1994 Frictional heat generation and seismic radiation in a foam rubber model of earthquakes;PAGEOPH 142 735–747
Baranowski J, Armbruster J, Seeber L and Molnar P 1984 Focal depths and fault plane solutions of earthquakes and active tectonics of the Himalaya;J. Geophys. Res. 89 6918–6928
Bird P 1978 Initiation of intracontinental subduction in the Himalaya;J. Geophys. Res. 83 4975–4987
Bott M H P and Kusznir N J 1984 The origin of tectonic stress in the lithosphere;Tectonophysics 105 1–13
Brune, J N, Brown S and Johnson P A 1993 Rupture mechanism and interface separation in foam rubber models of earthquakes: a possible solution to the heat flow paradox of large overthrusts;Tectonophysics 218 59–67
Brune J N, Johnson, P A and Slater C 1990 Nucleation, predictability and rupture mechanism in foam rubber models of earthquakes;J. Him. Geol. 1 155–166
Burchfiel B and Royden L H 1985 North-South extension within the convergent Himalayan region;Geology 13 679–682
Chander R 1988 Interpretation of observed ground level changes due to the 1905 Kangra earthquake, Northwest Himalaya;Tectonophysics 149 289–298
Chander R 1989 Southern limits of major earthquakes ruptures along the Himalaya between longitudes 75° and 90°E;Tectonophysics 170 115–123
Chander R 1995 On the need to install seismographs in the Himalayas;Curr. Sci. 68 239
Davis D, Suppe J and Dahlen F A 1983 Mechanics of fold-and-thrust and accretionary wedges;J. Geophys. Res. 88 1153–1172
England P and Molnar P 1993 The interpretation of inverted metamorphic isograds using simple physical calculations;Tectonics 12 145–157
Fitch T J 1970 Earthquake mechanisms in the Himalayan, Burmese and Andaman regions and the continental tectonics in central Asia;J. Geophys. Res. 75 2699–2709
Forsyth D and Uyeda S 1975 On the relative importance of the driving forces of plate motion;Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 43 163–200
Gahalaut V K and Chander R 1992 On the active tectonics of Dehradun region from observations of ground level changes;J. Geol. Soc. India 39 61–68
Gahalaut V K, Gupta P K, Chander R and Gaur V K 1994 Minimum norm inversion of observed ground elevation changes for slips on the causative fault during the 1905 Kangra earthquake;Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.) 103 401–411
Gansser A 1964Geology of the Himalayas (London: Intersci. publ. John Wiley) pp. 289
Haskell N 1964 Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating fault;Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 54 1811–1841
Hubbert M K and Rubey W W 1959 Role of fluid pressures in mechanics of overthrust faulting: 1. Mechanics of fluid filled porous solids and its application to overthrust faulting;Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 70 115–166
Jeffreys H 1962The Earth (Cambridge Univ. Press) pp. 438
Jaeger J C and Cook N 1969Fundamentals of rock mechanics (London: Methuen) pp. 513
Karner G D and Watts A B 1983 Gravity anomalies and flexure of the lithosphere at mountain ranges;J. Geophys. Res. 88 10449–10477
Kelleher J A, Sykes L R and Oliver J 1973 Possible criteria for predicting earthquake locations and their applications to major plate boundaries of the Pacific and Caribbean;J. Geophys. Res. 78 2547–2585
Lyon-Caen H and Molnar P 1985 Gravity anomalies, flexure of the Indian plate and structure, support and evolution of the Himalaya and Ganga basin;Tectonics 4 513–538
McGarr A 1988 On the state of lithospheric stress in the absence of applied tectonic forces;J. Geophys. Res. 93 13609–13617
Midha R K 1994 Latur earthquake: some major initiatives by DST;Deep continental studies in India, Newsletter for deep continental studies, (ed) B R Arora (Bombay: Indian Institute of Geomagnetism)4 8–10
Molnar P 1990 A review of the seismicity and the rates of active underthrusting and deformation at the Himalaya;J. Himalayan Geol. 1 131–154
Ni J and Barazangi M 1984 Seismotectonics of the Himalayan Collision zone: Geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya;J. Geophys. Res. 89 1147–1163
Seeber L and Armbruster J 1981 Great detachment earthquakes along the Himalayan arc and long-term forecasting; InEarthquake prediction. An international review Maurice Ewing series 4 (eds) D W Simpson and P G Richards (Washington D C: Am. Geophys. Union). pp. 259–277
Sibson R H 1986 Earthquakes and rock deformation in crustal fault zones;Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 14 149–175
Yeats R S and Lillie R J 1991 Contemporary tectonics of the Himalayan frontal fault system: folds, blind thrusts and the 1905 Kangra earthquake;J. Struct. Geol. 13 215–225
Zhao L S and Helmberger D V 1991 Geophysical implications from relocations of Tibetan earthquakes; Hot lithosphere;Geophys. Res. Lett. 18 2205–2208
Zhao W, Nelson K D and Project INDEPTH team 1993 Deep seismic reflection evidence for continental underthrusting beneath southern Tibet;Nature (London)366 557–559
Zoback M L 1992 First-and Second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The world stress map project;J. Geophys. Res. 97 11703–11728
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chander, R., Gahalaut, V.K. A simulation of upper crustal stresses for great and moderate thrust earthquakes of the Himalaya. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet Sci.) 104, 115–129 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02842278
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02842278