Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic solution to stochastic infiltrated flow equation

  • Water Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unsaturated flow with heterogeneous soil surfaces in the field scale is an outstanding issue in hydrologic modeling. The objective of this study is to develop and solve the upscaling conservation equation, which has the form of the Fokker-Planck equation. In this study, the impact of areal heterogeneity of soil hydraulic parameter on soil ensemble behavior during constant rainfall was examined. Field variability is assumed to take place in the horizontal plane. The results from the upscaling of one-dimensional vertical unsaturated flow model are compared with extensive sets of Monte-Carlo simulations for several degrees of the heterogeneity in soil surfaces. The application results of the upscaling model reveal that the upscaling model provides an adequate estimate of field scale soil moisture behavior in terms of its probability density distribution as well as its ensemble behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, J. and Shapiro, A.M. (1983). “Stochastic analysis of one-dimensional steady state unsaturated flow: A comparison of Monte Carlo and Perturbation methods.”Water Resour. Res. Vol. 19, pp. 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedient, P.B. and Huber, W.C. (1992).Hydrology and floodplain analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbridge, P. and White, I. (1988). “Constant rate rainfall infiltration: A versatile nonlinear model 1. Analytic solution.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 24, pp. 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T. (1964). “Hydraulic properties, of porous media.”Hydrol. Pap Vol. 3, p. 27, Colo, State Univ., Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J.S. and Cooper, G. (1970). “A practical difference scheme for Fokker-Planck equations.”J. Compu. Phys., Vol. 6, pp. 1–16.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z.-Q., Govindraju, R.S., and Kavvas, M.L. (1994a). “Spatial averageing of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields: 1. Development of models.”Water Resours. Res., Vol. 30, pp. 523–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z.-Q., Govindraju, R.S., and Kavvas, M.L. (1994b). “Spatial averageing of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields: 1. Numerical simulations.”Water Resours. Res., Vol. 30, pp. 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corless, R.M., Gonnet, G.H., Hare, D.E.G., Jeffrey, D.J., and Knuth, D.E. (1996). “On the Lambert W function.”Adv. Comput. Math., Vol. 5, pp. 329–359.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Corradini, C., Melone, F., and Smith, R.E. (1997). “A unified model for infiltration and redistribution during complex rainfall pattern.”J. of Hydro., Amsterdam, Vol. 192, pp. 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagan, G. and Bresler, E. (1983). “Unsaturated flow in spatially variable fields, 1. Derivation of models of infiltration and redistribution.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 19, pp. 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R.F. (1975). “A generalized theory of multiplicative stochastic processes using cumulant techniques.”J. Math. Phys., Vol. 16, pp. 289–297.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze, R.A. (1975). “A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media.”Water Resours. Res. Vol. 11, pp. 725–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, F.N., Shafer, R.E., and Crowley, W.P. (1973). “Algorithm 443: Solution of the transcendental equationwe w=x” CommunACM, Vol. 16, pp. 123–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, C.W. (1985). “Handbook of stochastic methods.” Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju, R.S., Or, D., Kavvas, M.L., Rolston, D.E., and Biggar, J. (1992). “Error analyses of simplified unsaturated flow models under large uncertainty in hydraulic properties.”Water Resours. Res., Vol. 28, pp. 2913–2924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindraraju, R.S., Morbidelli, R., and Corradini, C. (2001). “Areal mifiltration modeling over soils with spatially correlated hydraulic conductivities.”J. Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE. Vol. 6, pp. 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, W.H. and Ampt, G.A. (1911). “Studies on soil physics.”J. Agric. Sci., Vol. 4, pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillel, D. (1980). Applications of soil physics, Academic, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmans, J.W., Schukking, H., and Torfs, P.J.J. (1988). “Two-dimensional steady state unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soils with autocorrelated soil hydraulic properties.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 24, pp. 2005–2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indelman, P. and Dagan, G. (1993). “Upscaling of permeability of anisotropic heterogeneous formations, 2, General structure and small perturbation analysis.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 29, pp. 925–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S.H., Kim, S., and Yoon, Y.N. (2004). “The analysis of nonlinear hydrologic phenomenon with uncertainty.”Proc. of 2004 K.W.R.A. Conf., K.W.R.A., p. 130.

  • Jury, W.A., Gardner, W.R., and Gardner, W.H. (1991). Soil physics, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavvas, M.L. (2003). “Nonlinear hydrologic processes: conservation equations for their ensemble averages and probability distributions.”J. Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 8, pp. 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavvas, M.L. and Karakas, A. (1996). “On the stochastic theory of solute transport by unsteady and steady groundwater flow in heterogeneous aquifers.”J. Hydro. Vol. 179, pp. 321–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.J. (1991). “Development of infiltration model considering temporal variation of soil physical properties under natural rainfalls.”Ph.D. dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosugi, K. (1999). “General model for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity for soils with lognormal pore-size distribution.”Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., Vol. 63, pp. 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubo, R. (1962). “Generalized cumulant expansion method.”J. Phys. Soc. Japan, Vol. 17, pp. 1100–1120.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kubo, R. (1963). “Stochastic Liouville equations.”J. Math. Phys., Vol. 4, pp. 174–183.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.T. (1989). “A study on the surface runoff model with considerations to infiltration.”Ph.D dissertation, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maller, R.A., and Sharma, M.L. (1981). “An analysis of areal infiltration considering spatial variability.”J. of hydro., Amsterdam, Vol. 52, pp. 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantoglou, A. (1992). “A theoretical approach for modeling unsaturated flow in spatially variable soils: Effective flow models in finite domains and nonstationarity.”Water Resours. Res., Vol. 28, pp. 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantoglou, A. and Gelhar, L.W. (1987). “Stochastic modeling large-scale transient unsaturated flow systems.”Water Reours. Res., Vol. 23, pp. 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mein, R.G. and Larson, C.L. (1973). “Modeling infiltration during a steady rain.”Water Resour. Res., Vol.9, pp. 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, D.R., Biggar, J.W., and Erh, K.T. (1973). “Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties.”Hilgardia, Vol. 42, pp. 215–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. and Cho, W. (2002). “Derivation of infiltration model at the non-zero initial moisture condition.”Journal of Korea Water Resour. Assoc., K.W.R.A., Vol. 35, pp. 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, D. and Bresler, E. (1981a). “Effect of field variability in soil hydraulic properties on solutions of unsaturated water and salt flows.”Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. Vol. 45, pp. 675–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, D. and Bresler, E. (1981b). “Soil hydraulic properties as stochastic processes, 1, Analysis of field spatial variabilty.”Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., Vol. 45, pp. 682–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, D. and Bresler, E. (1982). “A univariate versus a multivariate parameter distribution in a stochastic conceptual analysis of unsaturated flow.”Water Resour Res. Vol. 18, pp. 483–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M.L. and Seely, E. (1979). “Spatial variability and its effect on infiltration.”Proc. Hydro. And Water Resour. Symp., Institute of Engineering, Australia, Perth, Australia, pp. 69–73.

  • Sivapalan, M. and Wood, E.F. (1986). “Spatial heterogeneity and scale in the infiltration response of catchments.” Scale problems in hydrology, D. Reidel, ed., Norwell, Mass., pp. 81–106.

  • Smith, L. and Freeze, R.A. (1979). “Stochastic analysis of steady state ground water flow in a bounded domain, 1, One-dimensional simulations.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 15, pp. 521–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.E. and Diekkruger, B. (1996). “Effective soil water characteristics and ensemble soil water profiles in heterogeneous soils.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 32, pp. 1993–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.E. and Parlange, J.-Y. (1978). “A parameter-efficient hydrologic infiltration model.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 14, pp. 533–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.E. and Hebbert, R.H.B. (1979). “A Monte Carlo analysis of the hydrologic effects of spatial variability of infiltration.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 15, pp. 419–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kampen, N.G. (1974). “A cumulant expansion for stochastic linear differential equation II.”Physica, Vol. 74, pp. 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kampen, N.G. (1976). “Stochastic differential equations.”Phys. Rep. Vol. 24, pp.171–228.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kampen, N.G. (1981). “Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry.” Amsterdam, Elsevier North-Holland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Woolhiser, D.A. and Goodrich, D.C. (1988). “Effect of storm rainfall intensity patterns on surface runoff.”J. Hydro., Amsterdam, Vol. 102, pp. 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, T.-C.J., Gelhar, L.W., and Gutjahr, A.L. (1985) “Stochastic analysis of unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soils, 2, Statistically anisotropic media.”Water Resour. Res., Vol. 21, pp. 457–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. and Mohanty, B.P. (2002) “Upscaling of soil hydraulic properties for steady state evaporation and infiltration.”Water Resour. Res. Vol. 38, pp. 1178–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S., Jang, S.H., Yoon, Y.N.m. et al. Probabilistic solution to stochastic infiltrated flow equation. KSCE J Civ Eng 8, 651–662 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823556

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823556

Keywords

Navigation