Skip to main content
Log in

Problems involving a number of factors

  • Scientific Principles for Maximum Learning from Motion Pictures
  • Published:
Audiovisual communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Allen, W. H. “Readability of Instructional Film Commentary.”Journal of Applied Psychology 36: 164–168; June 1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allison, Sahah G., andAsh, P. Relationship of Anxiety to Learning from Films. Technical Report SDC 269-7-24, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, April 1951. 15 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, E. B. The Relationship of Group Discussion, Decision, Commitment, and Consensus to Individual Action. Doctor’s thesis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1952. (Unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berlyne, D. E. “An Experimental Study of Human Curiosity.”British Journal of Psychology 45: 256–265; November 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter, C. R. “A Challenge for Research.”Educational Screen 27: 119–121; March 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carpenter, C. R. “A Theoretical Orientation for Instructional Film Research.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 1: 38–52; Winter 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chall, Jeanne S., andDial, H. E. “Predicting Listener Understanding and Interest in Newscasts.”Educational Research Bulletin 27: 141–153, 168; September 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Commonwealth Office of Education.The Effective Use of Sound Films. Research Report No. 4. Sidney, Australia: Commonwealth Office of Education, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, A. Social Class Influences upon Learning. The Inglis Lecture, 1948. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dollard, J. “Under What Conditions Do Opinions Predict Behavior?”Public Opinion Quarterly 12: 623–632; Winter 1948–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dollard, J., andMiller, N. E. Personality and Psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1950. 488 p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dysinger, W. S., andRuckmick, C. A. The Emotional Response of Children to the Motion Picture Situation. New York: Macmillan Co., 1933. 285 p.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ecgleton, R.;Carpenter, C. R.;John, F. T.; andCannon, J. B. The Classroom Communicator. Technical Report SDC 269-7-14, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, October 1950. 30 p.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Flanagan, J. C., editor.The Aviation Psychology Program in the Army Air Forces. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports, No. 1. Washington, D. C.: Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, 1948. 316 p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gagne, R. M., andFoster, Harriet. “Transfer to a Motor Skill from Practice on a Pictured Representation.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 39: 342–355; June 1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson, E. J. “Improvement in Perceptual Judgments as a Function of Controlled Practice or Training.”Psychological Bulletin 50: 401–431; November 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson, J. J., editor.Motion Picture Testing and Research. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports, No. 7. Washington, D. C.: Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, 1947. 267 p.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gibson, J. J. The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1950. 235 p.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson, J. J. “A Theory of Pictorial Perception.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 2: 3–23; Winter 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gibson, J. J., andGibson, E. J. “Perceptual Learning: Differentiation or Enrichment?”Psychological Review 62: 32–41; January 1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grose, R. F. A Comparison of Vocal and Subvocal Conditioning of the Galvanic Skin Response. Doctor’s thesis. New Haven: Yale University, 1953. (Unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harlow, H. F. “Motivation as a Factor in New Responses.”Current Theory and Research in Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1933. p. 2449.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hartshorne, H., andMay, M. “Studies in Deceit.”Studies in the Nature of Character. Vol. 1. Columbia University Teachers College. New York: Macmillan Co., 1928. 720 p.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hirsch, R. S. The Effects of Knowledge of Test Results on Learning of Meaningful Material. Human Engineering Report SDC 269-7-30, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, September 1952. 27 p.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hite, H. A Study of Teacher Education Methods for Audio-Visual Competency in Washington 1937–1947. Doctor’s thesis. Pullman: State College of Washington, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoban, C. F. “Determinants of Audience Reaction: Status.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 1: 242–251; Fall 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoban, C. F. “Determinants of Audience Reaction to a Training Film.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 1: 30–37; Winter 1953 a.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoban, C. F., andVan Ormer, E. B. Instructional Film Research 1918–1950. Technical Report SDC 269-7-19, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, December 1950. 181 p.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Holaday, P. W., andStoddard, G. D. Getting Ideas from the Movies. New York: Macmillan Co., 1933. 102 p.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Holmberg, A. R. Nomads of the Long Bow: The Siriono of Eastern Bolivia. The Smithsonian Institute of Social Anthropology. Publication No. 10. Washington, D. C.: Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, 1950. 104 p.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hovland, C. I.;Janis, I. L.; andKelley, H. H. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953. 315 p.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hovland, C. I.;Lumsdaine, A. A.; andSheffield, F. D. Experiments on Mass Communication. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1949. 345 p.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Howell, J. J. The Effect of Educational Films on Student Participation in Discussion. Doctor’s thesis. New Haven: Yale University, 1954. (Unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jaspen, N. Effects on Training of Experimental Film Variables, Study I: Verbalization, Rate of Development, Nomenclature, Errors, “How-It-Works,” Repetition. Technical Report SDC 269-7-17, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, October 1950. 25 p.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jaspen, N. Effects on Training of Experimental Film Variables, Study II: Verbalization, “How-It-Works,” Nomenclature, Audience Participation, and Succinct Treatment. Technical Report SDC 269-7-11, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, March 1950. 13 p.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kimble, G. A., andWulff, J. J.Response Guidance” as a Factor in the Value of Audience Participation in Training Film Instruction. HFORL Memo Report No. 36. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Air Force, Human Factors Operations Research Laboratories, Air Research and Development Command, Boiling Air Force Base, March 1953. 45 p.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kleitman, N. “The Effect of Motion Pictures on Body Temperature.”Science 101: 507–508; May 18, 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kopstein, F. F.;Sulzer, R. L.; andLumsdaine, A. A. The Value of Using Multiple Examples in Training Film Instruction. HRRL Report No. 25. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Air Force, Human Resources Research Laboratories, Headquarters Command, Boiling Air Force Base, May 1952. 31 p.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lathrop, C. W., Jr., andNorford, C. A. Contributions of Film Introductions and Film Summaries to Learning from Instructional Films. Technical Report SDC 269-7-8, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, November 1949. 23 p.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lumsdaine, A. A. “Experimental Research and the Improvement of Teaching Films.”Educational Screen 26: 254–255; May 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lumsdaine, A. A. Ease of Learning with Pictorial and Verbal Symbols. Doctor’s thesis. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University, 1949. (Unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lumsdaine, A. A. “Audio-Visual Research in the United States Air Force.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 1: 76–90; Spring 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lumsdaine, A. A., 1955. (Unpublished manuscript to appear as part ofLearning from Pictures, edited byMark A. May.)

  44. Lumsdaine, A. A., andSulzer, R. L. The Influence of Simple Animation Techniques on the Value of a Training Film. HRRL Report No. 24. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Air Force, Human Resources Research Laboratories, Headquarters Command, Boiling Air Force Base, April 1951. 25 p.

    Google Scholar 

  45. May, Mark A. “The Psychology of Learning from Demonstration Films.”Journal of Educational Psychology 37: 1–12; January 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McClelland, D. C. Studies in Motivation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1955. 552 p.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Meierhenry, W. C. Enriching the Curriculum Through Motion Pictures. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1952. 255 p.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Michael, D. N., andMaccoby, N. “Factors Influencing Verbal Learning from Films under Varying Conditions of Audience Participation.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 46: 411–418; December 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Miller, N. E. “Social Science and the Art of Advertising.”Journal of Marketing 14: 580–584; January 1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Miller, N. E. “Liberalization of Basic S-R Concepts: Extensions to Conflict Behavior and Social Learning.” Study 1. Conceptual and Systematic Formulations, Learning and Special Processes.Psychology: A Study of a Science. (Edited by S. Koch) New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1958. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Miller, N. E. “Learnable Drives and Rewards.”Handbook of Experimental Psychology. (Edited by S. S. Stevens.) New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1951. p. 435–472.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Miller, N. E., editor.Psychological Research on Pilot Training. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports. No. 8. Washington, D. C.: Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, 1947. 488 p.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Miller, N. E., andDollard, J. Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1941. 341 p.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Montgomery, K. C. “The Role of Exploratory Drive in Learning.”Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 47: 60–64; February 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Myers, A. K., andMiller, N. E. “Failure To Find a Learned Drive Based on Hunger; Evidence for Learning Motivated by ‘Exploration.’”Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 47: 428–436; December 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nerden, J. T. A Study of Factors Related to the Use of Motion Picture Films by Public School Teachers. Doctor’s thesis. New Haven: Yale University, 1954. (Unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nowlis, V. “The Development and Modification of Motivational Systems in Personality.”Symposium on Current Theory and Research in Motivation. (J. S. Brown, et al.) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1953. p. 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Renshaw, S.;Miller, V. L.; andMarquis, Dorothy P. Children’s Sleep. New York: Macmillan Co., 1933. 242 p.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Roethlisbercer, F. J., andDickson, W. J. Management and the Worker. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1941. 615 p.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Roshal, S. M. Effects of Learner Representation in Film-Mediated Perceptual-Motor Learning. Technical Report SDC 269-7-5. Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, December 1949. 42 p.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ruesch, J., andPrestwood, A. R. “Anxiety—Its Initiation, Communication and Interpersonal Management.”Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 62: 527–550; November 1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rulon, P. J. The Sound Motion Picture in Science Teaching. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, 1933. 236 p.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Skinner, B. F. “The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching.”Harvard Educational Review 24: 86–97; Spring 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Stenn, F. “The Need for a Comprehensive Medical Audio-Visual Aid Center.”Science 118: 754–755; December 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sturmthal, A., andCurtis, Alherta. “A Study of Audience Reactions to Two Educational Films.” (In “Experimental Research in Audio-Visual Education” by David Goodman.)Educational Screen 22: 306, 314–315; October 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Thompson, Louise.A Role of Verbalization in Learning from Demonstrations. Unpublished thesis. New Haven: Yale University, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Twyford, L. Film Profiles. Technical Report SDC 269-7-23, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, November 1951. 17 p.

    Google Scholar 

  68. VanderMeer, A. W. Effects of Film-Viewing Practice on Learning from Instructional Films. Technical Report SDC 269-7-20, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, November 1951. 12 p.

    Google Scholar 

  69. VanderMeer, A. W. Relative Effectiveness of Instruction by: Films Exclusively, Films plus Study Guides, and Standard Lecture Methods. Technical Report SDC 269-7-13, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, July 1950. 51 p.

    Google Scholar 

  70. VanderMeer, A. W. Training Film Evaluation: Comparison Between Two Films on Personal Hygiene: TF8-155 and TF8-1665. Technical Report SDC 269-7-50, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, October 1953. 27 p.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Vernon, P. E. “An Experiment on the Value of the Film and Filmstrip in the Instruction of Adults.”British Journal of Educational Psychology 16: 149–162; November 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wertheimer, M. Productive Thinking. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1945. 224 p.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Williams, D. G. Communication of Technical Information in the Underdeveloped Areas of the World. Syracuse, N. Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1953. 22 p.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yale Motion Picture Research Project. “Do ‘Motivation’ and ‘Participation’ Questions Increase Learning?”Educational Screen 26: 256–259, 274–283; May 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zuckerman, J. V. Commentary Variations: Level of Verbalization, Personal Reference, and Phase Relations in Instructional Films on Perceptual-Motor Tasks. Technical Report SDC 269-7-4, Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University. Port Washington, Long Island, N. Y.: Special Devices Center, December 1949. 67 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Problems involving a number of factors. AVCR 5, 104–117 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02799336

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02799336

Navigation