Skip to main content
Log in

Selective removal of enzymes from substrate and products. An alternative to immobilization for enzymes acting on macromolecular or solid substrates

  • Original Ariticle
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new approach for the control and interruption of enzymatic reactions via selective enzyme immobilization has been developed. The technique was exemplified by the use of three model enzymes with the corresponding macromolecular substrates: α-amylase/starch, trypsin/ insoluble collagen, and alkaline phosphatase/plasmid DNA. Prior to incubation with its substrate, each enzyme was provided withde novo thiol-groups by a two-step reaction involvingN-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate (SPDP) and DTT. The chemical modification was achieved such that at least 80% of the native enzyme activity was preserved in all cases.

In order to interrupt rapidly the reactions in which the enzymes were used, the modified enzyme was immobilized by reaction via its thiol groups on a thiolsulfinate-agarose derivative. The gel-bound enzyme could then be easily removed from unreacted substrate and product by filtration or centrifugation. Comparative studies showed that the immobilized enzymes had much lower activities in the reactions studied than the corresponding soluble ones. The potential for enzyme reuse was also demonstrated with the a-amylase derivatives, which were quantitatively released and eluted in fully active form from the agarose. We have shown that it is possible to achieve practically complete enzyme immobilization in short times and thus to control the progress of the reactions. Because of its simplicity and high efficiency, this approach may represent an interesting alternative for biotechnological processes involving macromolecular or solid substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAEE:

N-α-benzoyl-l-arginine ethyl ester

DTT:

1,4-dithio-dl-threitol

mPU:

milli-phosphatase units

pNPP:

p-nitrophenyl-phosphate

Py-S-S:

Dithiopyridyl

SPDP:

N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate

SH:

thiol

TSI:

thiolsulfinate-

References

  1. Katchlski-Katzir, E.Trends Biotechnol.,11 (1993), 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, D. S.Trends Biotechnol.,12 (1994), 439–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Remy, M. H., Wetzer, J., and Thomas, D. (1976), The International Symposium on Analysis and Control of Immobilized Enzyme Systems, Compiègne, France, 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy, J. F., and Cabrai, J. M., Scouten W. H. eds. (1983),Solid Phase Biochemistry, John Wiley, 253–391.

  5. Marshal J., and Rabinowitz, M. L.J. Biol. Chem. p.251 (1946), 1081–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norrander, D. M., Kempe, T., and Messing, J.Gene,27 (1983), 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Takeshita, S., Sato, M., Toba, M., Masahashi, W., and Hashimoto-Gotoh, T.Gene 61 (1987), 63–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Batista-Viera, P., Manta, C., and Carlsson, J.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 44 (1994), 1–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brocklehurst, K., Carlsson, J., Kierstan, M., and Crook, E.Biochem.J. 133 (1973), 573–584.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bradford, M.Anal. Biochem. 72 (1976), 248–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernfeld, P., Amylases, α and β, in Methods in Enzymology, Collowick and Kaplan, Eds., Academic, New York vol. 1, 1955, pp. 149–158.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. “Phadebas Amylase test” Pharmacia Diagnostics Catalog, Uppsala, Sweden, 1983.

  13. Powell, L. W. in Russell, G. E. (eds),Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, Intercept, (1984) p. 409–438.

  14. Ledingham, W. M., and Hornby, W. E. FEBS Lett.5 (1969), 118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanahan D. Techniques for transformation ofE. coli, IRL, Oxford, (1985),136

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chavira, R., Jr., Burnett, T. J. and Hageman, J. H.Anal. Biochem. (1984), 446–450.

  17. Boundy, J. A., Smiley, K. L., Swanson, C. L., and Hofreiter, B. T.Carbohydr Res.,48 (1976), 239–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Batista-Viera, F., Barbieri, M., Ovsejevi, K., Manta, C., and Carlsson, J.Appl. Biochem. and Biotechnol. 31 (1991), 175–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Diaz, T., Stahl, U., Batista-Viera, F., and Carlsson, J.Biotechnol. Tech. 9 (1995), 533–538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brena, B., Ovsejevi, K., Luna, B., and Batista-Viera, F.J. Mol. Catalysis 84 (1993), 381–390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oscarsson, S., and Carlsson, J.Analyst,116 (1991), 787–791.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brena, B.M., Lidholm, J., Batista-Viera, F. et al. Selective removal of enzymes from substrate and products. An alternative to immobilization for enzymes acting on macromolecular or solid substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 75, 323–341 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02787784

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02787784

Index entries

Navigation