Summary
Portrayals of 12 emotional states were presented to observers in three experimental conditions-(a) photographic slides of facial expression, (b) tape recordings of vocal expression, and (c) a combination of visual and vocal stimuli. Factor analyses of observers’ scalar responses to the stimuli suggested the following:
-
1.
Dimensions of recognition are applicable to perception of emotions in vocal as well as visual presentations.
-
2.
At least two dimensions-general evaluation andactivity- may have some generality between visual and vocal modes and across different emotional states. A third dimension,social control, may have been unique to the present design due to the extremes of the expressions involved.
-
3.
Perception ofactivity in photographs vs. tape recordings of emotional portrayals seems most susceptible to individual scale differences-a phenomenon which might be characterized as“modality-scale” interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dusenbury, D., and Knower, F. H.“Experimental Studies of the Symbolism of Action and Voice-I: A Study of the Specificity of Meaning in Facial Expression.”Quarterly Journal of Speech 24: 424–36; October 1938.
Dusenbury, D., and Knower, F. H.“Experimental Studies of the Symbolism of Action and Voice-II: A Study of the Specificity of Meaning in Abstract Tonal Symbols.”Quarterly Journal of Speech 25: 67–75; February 1939.
Fairbanks, G., and Hoaglin, L. W.“An Experimental Study of the Durational Characteristics of the Voice During the Expression of Emotion.”Speech Monographs 8: 85–90; 1941.
Fairbanks, G., and Pronovost, W.“An Experimental Study of the Pitch Characteristics of the Voice During Expression of Emotion.”Speech Monographs 6: 87–104; 1939.
Fridja, N. H., and Philipszoon, E.“Dimensions of Recognition of Expression.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 45–51; January 1963.
Hofstätter, P. R.“Dimensionen des Mimischen Ausdrunks.”Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 3: 505–27; Part 4, 1956-57.
Osgood, C. E.“Studies on the Generality of Affective Meaning Systems.”American Psychologist 17: 10–28; January 1962.
Osgood, C. E.; Suci, G. J.; and Tannenbaum, P. H.The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
Schlosberg, H.“A Scale for the Judgment of Facial Expression.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 29:497–510; December 1941.
Schlosberg, H.“Three Dimensions of Emotion.”Psychological Review 61: 81–88; March 1954.
Tolch, C. J.Studies in the Measurement and Analysis of Achievement with Some Visual Symbols of Speech. Doctor’s thesis. Columbus: Ohio State University, 1959. (Typewritten)
Williams, F., and Tolch, C. J.“Communication by Facial Expression.”Journal of Communication; in press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based, in part, upon results reported in Miss Sundene’s master’s thesis, “The Generality of Affective Reaction to Visual and Vocal Expressives,” University of Wisconsin, 1964.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, F., Sundene, B. Dimensions of recognition: Visual vs. Vocal expression of emotion. AVCR 13, 44–52 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770781
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770781