Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding the determinants of crime

  • Corruption Symposium
  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we use an overlapping generations model where individuals are allowed to engage in both legitimate market activities and criminal behavior in order to assess the role of certain factors on the property crime rate. In particular, we investigate if differences in the unemployment rate, fraction of low human capital individuals in an economy, apprehension probability, duration of a jail sentence, and income inequality could be capable of generating large differences in crime rates that are observed across countries. We find that small differences in the apprehension probability and income inequality can generate quantitatively significant differences in the crime rates across similar environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barclay, G. and C. Tavares. 2003. International Comparisons of Criminal Justice Statistics. Home Office Statistical Bulletin, December.

  • Becker, G.S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.”Journal of Political Economy 78: 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., D. Nagin, and J. Cohen. 1978.Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. Washington: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S. 1998. “The Economics of Crime Deterrence: A Survey of Theory and Evidence.”Kyklos 41: 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, T.F. and E.C. Prescott. 1995. “Economic Growth and Business Cycles.” inFrontiers of Business Cycle Research, edited by T.F. Cooley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, M. and M. Gustavsson. 2005. “Inequality and Crime: Separating the Effect from Permanent and Transitory Income.” Working Paper Series 2005: 19, IFAU—Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation.

  • DiIulio, J. and A.M. Piehl. 1991. “Does Prison Pay? The Stormy National Debate over the Cost-Effectiveness of Imprisonment.”Brookings Review 9: 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I. 1973. “Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A theoretical and Empirical Investigation.”Journal of Political Economy 81: 521–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I. 1981. “On the Usefulness of Controlling Individuals: An Economic Analysis of Rehabilitation, Incapacitation, and Deterrence.”American Economic Review 71: 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I. 1996. “Crime, Punishment, and the Market for Offenses.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, P., D. Lederman, and N. Loayza. 2002. “Inequality and Violent Crime.”Journal of Law and Economics 45: 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. 1996. “Why Do So Many Young American Men Commit Crimes and What Might We Do about It?”Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, J. 1991. “Certainty vs. Severity of Punishment.”Economic Inquiry 29: 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, J. 1998. “Market Wages and Youth Crime.”Journal of Labor Economics 16: 756–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. and A. İmrohoroĝlu. 1992. “The Role of Unemployment Insurance in an Economy with Liquidity Constraints and Moral Hazard.”Journal of Political Economy 100: 118–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İmrohoroĝlu, A., S. İmrohoroĝlu, and D. Joines. 1999. “Social Security in an Overlapping Generations Economy with Land.”Review of Economic Dynamics 2: 638–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İmrohoroĝlu, A., A. Merlo, and P. Rupert. 2004. “What Accounts for the Decline in Crime?”International Economic Review 45: 707–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İmrohoroĝlu, A., A. Merlo, and P. Rupert. 2000. “On the Political Economy of Income Redistribution and Crime.”International Economic Review 41: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. 1998. “Why Do Increased Arrest Rates Appear to Reduce Crime: Deterrence, Incapacitation, or Measurement Error?”Economic Inquiry 36: 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvell, T.B., and C.E. Moody. 1996. “Specification Problems, Police Levels, and Crime Rates.”Criminology 34: 609–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, A. 2004. “Income Inequality and Crime: The Case of Sweden.” Working Paper Series, IFAU—Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation.

  • Polinsky, M. and S. Shavell. 1984. “The Optimal Use of Fines and Imprisonment.”Journal of Public Economics 24: 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prohaska, C. and W. Taylor. 1973. “Minimizing Losses in a Hostile Environment: The Cost of Defending One's Castle.”The Journal of Risk and Insurance 40: 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. 1970. “The Optimum Enforcement of Laws.”Journal of Political Economy 78: 526–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokey, N. and Lucas Jr., R.E., with Prescott, E. 1989.Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, A.D. and H. Tauchen. 1994. “Work and Crime: An Exploration Using Panel Data.”Public Finance 49: 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayse İmrohoroĝlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

İmrohoroĝlu, A., Merlo, A. & Rupert, P. Understanding the determinants of crime. J Econ Finan 30, 270–284 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761491

Keywords

Navigation