Skip to main content
Log in

Arbitration: Semi-judicial process or negotiation?

  • Published:
Current Psychological Reviews

Abstract

Arbitration is usually described as a semi-judicial, evaluative process, where the parties to a dispute surrender their responsibility for its resolution to a disinterested third party. The arbitrator is expected to listen impartially to the arguments of both sides and, on the basis of the evidence put forward, decide the issue between them. This paper questions the validity of the typical image of arbitration and suggests that a more comprehensive understanding can be developed if it is viewed in the context of different models of negotiation. It is argued that the arbitrator is likely to have at least two contrasting roles: (1) that of manager of the process of concession-convergence, when the issues in dispute are relatively straightforward; and (2) that of joint negotiator with the parties, constructing a framework for a future detailed resolution of the dispute, when the issues are more complex. The parties, on the other hand, are likely to be differentiated according to their previous experience of arbitration. While the more experienced participants may be able to make skilful strategic use of the procedures, the inexperienced are likely to be adversely affected by the evaluative/judicial public image of arbitration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C.N. & Weil, H.G. (1969). Players, persons and purposes: situational meaning and the prisoner’s dilemma game. Sociometry, 32, 112–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amulree, Lord G.B.E. (1929). Industrial Arbitration in Great Britain. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, P.D. (1977). The Conduct of Industrial Relations. London: Institute of Personnel Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, P. D. & Crichton, A. (1969). Industrial Relations and the Personnel Specialist. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balke, W.M., Hammond, K.R. & Meyer, G.D. (1973). An alternative approach to labor-management relations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batstone, E., Boraston, I. & Frenkel, S. (1978). Shop Stewards in Action: The Organisation of Workplace Conflict and Accommodation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigoness, W.J. (1976). Effect of locus of control and style of third-party intervention upon bargaining behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1976). Social Psychology and Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, H.A. (1979). The Changing System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J.G. (1977). Negotiation as a Learning Process. In I.W. Zartman (ed.), The Negotiation Process. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A. (1962). Industrial Peacemaking. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D. (1977). Boundary Role Conflict. In I.W. Zartman (ed.), The Negotiation Process. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, W. & Loveridge, R. (1982). A Theory and Technique of Negotiating and Bargaining. Unpublished dissertation, University of Aston in Birmingham.

  • Fleming, R.W. (1965). The Labor Arbitration Process. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geen, R.G. & Gange, J.J. (1977). Drive theory of social facilitation: twelve years of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(6), 1267–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillebaud, C.W. (1970). The Role of the Arbitrator in Industrial Wage Disputes. London: James Nisbet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1972a). Disputes Procedure in Action: A Study of the Disputes Procedure in Coventry. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1972b). Strikes. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. and Brough, I. (1975). Social Values and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C. & Sherman, B. (1977). Collective Bargaining. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.F. & Pruitt, D.G. (1972). Preintervention effects of mediation versus arbitration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.F. & Tullar, W.L. (1972). Style of third-party intervention, face-saving and bargaining behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, D. (1955). Arbitration and industrial conflict. British Journal of Sociology, 6, 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, J.V.B. (1979). Industrial Arbitration in Great Britain. London: Institute of Personnel Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magenau, J.M. & Pruitt, D.G. (1979). The Social Psychology of Bargaining. In G.M. Stephenson & C.J. Brotherton (eds.), Industrial Relations: A Social Psychological Approach. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgaard, K. & Underdal, A. (1977). Multiparty Conferences. In D. Druckman (ed.), Negotiations: Social Psychological Perspectives. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, I.E. (1979). Behavioural Studies of Industrial Bargaining. In G.M. Stephenson & C.J. Brotherton (eds.), Industrial Relations: A Social Psychological Approach. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, I.E. (1980). Negotiation and Bargaining. In M. Argyle (ed.), Handbook of Social Skills. Volume 2. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, I.E. (1981). Bargaining and Negotiation. In C.L. Cooper (ed.), Psychology and Management: A Text for Managers and Trade Unionists. London: British Psychological Society and Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, I.E. & Stephenson, G.M. (1977). The Social Psychology of Bargaining. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1972). Society and Theory in Social Psychology. In J. Israel and H. Tajfel (eds.), The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham, N. & Carlisle, J. (1978a). The effective negotiator — part I. Journal of European Industrial Training, 2, 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackham, N. & Carlisle, J. (1978b). The effective negotiator — part II. Journal of European Industrial Training, 2, 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G.H. & Diesing, P. (1977). Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision-Making and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, G.M. & Webb, J. (1982). A Simulation Study of Third Parties in Industrial Decision-Making. In H. Brandstatter, J.H. Davis & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (eds.), Group Decision Making. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J.T. & Walker, F. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K.F. (1970). Australian Industrial Relations Systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R.E. & McKersie, R.B. (1965). A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight-Bakke, E. & Kerr, C. (eds.) (1948). Unions, Management and The Public. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winham, G.R. (1977). Complexity in International Negotiation. In D. Druckman (ed.), Negotiations: Social Psychological Perspectives. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winham, G.R. & Bovis, H.E. (1978). Agreement and breakdown in negotiation: report on a state department training simulation. Journal of Peace Research, 15, 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. (1977). Annual Report of the Central Arbitration Committee. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I.W. (1977). Negotiation as a Joint Decision-Making Process. In I.W. Zartman (ed.), The Negotiation Process. Chapter 4. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webb, J. Arbitration: Semi-judicial process or negotiation?. Current Psychological Reviews 2, 251–268 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684460

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684460

Keywords

Navigation