Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of macrobius and boethius in some fourteeth-century commentaries on Virgil

  • Published:
International Journal of the Classical Tradition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four commentators on Virgil, Nicholas Trevet, Francesco Petrarca, Ciones (Zonus) de Magnali, and Benvenuto da Imola, besides citing an abundant number of classical writers, owed a special debt to the late antique authors, Macrobius and Boethius. From Macrobius they quoted passages of antiquarian and philosophical interest from theSaturnalia and from theCommentarii in Somnium Scipionis. Petrarch in his manuscript of Virgil, the Codex Ambrosianus, Sala dal Prefetto 10/27, was particularly diligent in copying out passages from Macrobius. These are presented in an Appendix to the present article (pp. 14–22). The Virgilian commentators were inspired also by the moral earnestness of theDe Consolatione Philosophiae of Boethius. Themes treated by the commentators include the harmony of the spheres, the descent of the soul into the body through the orbits of the planets, and Platonic elements inAeneid 6. These references help to illustrate the vigor and variety of the Virgilian commentaries and their contribution to the growing humanistic movement of the fourteenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inventario Ceruti dei manoscritti della Biblioteca Ambrosiana (Trezzano, 1973), I. 29. See C.E. Murgia,Prolegomena to Servius 5—The Manuscripts (Berkeley, 1975) 55–56, 202, for the confusion in numbers between A.49inf. and A. 79inf., also a manuscript of Virgil.

  2. See M. L. Lord, “Petrarch and Vergil's FirstEclogue: The Codex Ambrosianus,”Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 86 (1982) 253–76, with bibliographical notes. See also Giuseppe Billanovich, “II Virgilio del Petrarca da Avignone a Milano,” from Gian Carlo Alessio, Giuseppe Billanovich, Violetta de Angelis,L'Alba del Petrarca Filology: Il Virgilio Ambrosiano, inStudi Petrarcheschi 2 (1985) 15–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Billanovich, “II Virgilio del Petrarca,” 20–23.

  4. P. de Nolhac,Pétrarque et l'Humanisme, 2nd ed. (Paris, 1907) I, 144–145. In vol. II de Nolhac reproduces Petrarch's memorial notices in Excursus VI. 283–287. G. Billanovich, “II virgilio del Petrarca,” 41–46, carefully lists the circumstances when and where petrarch entered the obituary notices on the anterior flyleaf of the Ambrosian Virgil; he also notes the occasions when Petrarch did not have the manuscript with him.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For the facsimile edition, seeFrancisci Petrarcae Vergilianus Codex ad Publii Vergilii Maronis diem natalem bis millesimum celebrandum quam simillime expressus atque in lucem editus Iuvantibus Bibliotheca Ambrosiana et Regia in Insubribus Academia (Milan, 1930). See the Appendix to this article (infra, pp. 14–22) for an account of the twenty-five citations of Macrobius.

  6. P. de Nolhac,Pétrarque et L'humanisme, I, 137.

  7. Cf. Appendix, item 3.

  8. See Walter Wimmel, “Der Augusteer Lucius Varius Rufus,” in:Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt (ANRW), II. 30, 3 ed. Wolfgang Haase (Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1983) pp. 1562–1621. See also Wendell Clausen,A Comentary on Virgil: Eclogues (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994), note onEcl. 8.88, p. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Appendix, item 18.

  10. See Appendix, item 20.

  11. Petrarch: “p..strat.” For the text of Macrobius, see J. Willis,Ambrosii Theodosii Macrobii Saturnalia, In Somnium Scipionis Commentarii, 2nd vol. of 2 (Leipzig, 1970). I have used William H. Stahl,Macrobius, Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Translated with an Introduction and Notes (New York, 1952) 145, 196, with occasional modifications.

  12. Translation by William H. Stahl. See Appendix, item 21.

  13. See Appendix, item 4.

  14. The earliest known manuscript of Ciones' commentary on theAeneid, Paris, Bibl. Nat., Nouv. Acq. Lat. 2200–2201, carries the date 1336. See Léopold Delisle,Catalogue des Manuscrits du fonds de la Trémoille (Paris, 1889) 46–47.

  15. See M. L. Lord, “The Commentary on Virgil'sEclogues by Benvenuto da Imola: a Comparative Study of theRecollectiones,”Evphrosyne. Revista de Filología Clássica n.s. 22 (1994) 373–401. See also Fausto Ghisalberti,Le Chiose Virgiliane di Benvenuto da Imola, Pubblicazioni della Reale Accademia Virgiliana di Mantova, Serie Miscellanea, vol. 9Celebrazioni Bimillenarie (Mantua, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The manuscripts of Benvenuto da Imola, all from S XV, include: Cremona, Bibl. Governativa (Statale) 109, Commentary on theEclogues andGeorgics. See A. Sorbelli,Inventari dei Manoscritti delle Biblioteche d'Italia (Florence, 1939) LXX, 83–84; London, British Library, Add. MS 10095, Commentary on theEclogues andGeorgics. See A. G. Watson,Catalogue of Dated and Datable Manuscripts (c. 700–1600) in the Department of Manuscripts, British Libary (London 1979) no. 21, p.27; Modena, Bibl. Estense, MS Campori App. 263=gamma H.5. 11, Commentary on theGeorgics. See Raimondo Vandini,Appendice Prima al Catalogo dei Codici e Manoscritti Posseduti dal Marchese Giuseppe Campori (Modena, 1886) 100; Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Lat. class. c. 9, Commentary on theEcologues andGeorgics. SeeThe Beoleian Library Record, I, 1938–1941 (Oxford, 1941) 53; Vatican City, Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, Ottob. Lat. 1262, Commentary on theEclogues andGeorgics. See Elisabeth Pellegrin, et al.,Les Manuscrits Classiques Latins de la Bibliothèque Vaticane, I (Paris, 1975) 508. Another manuscript of Benvenuto's commentary on theGeorgics, Florence, Museo Horne 2924 (D. 3. 35) anno 1484, has recently been identified by Virgina Brown, editor of theCatalogus Translationum et Commentariorum.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ruth J. Dean, “Cultural Relations in the Middle Ages: Nicholas Trevet and Nicholas of Prato,”Studies in Philology 45 (1948) 541–564; A. B. Emden,A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford to A.D. 1500 3, vols. (Oxford, 1957–59) 3: 1902-3; thomas Kaeppeli,Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum Medii Aevi, 3 vols. (Rome, 1970–80) 3: 187.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aires Augusto Nascimento and José Manuel Díaz de Bustamante,Nicolás Trivet Anglico, Comentario a las Bucólicas de Virgilio: Estudio y edición crítica, Monografias de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela 97 (Santiago de Compostela) 1984.

  19. See Vladimiro Zabughin, “L'Umanesimo nella storia della scienza, il commento Vergiliano di Zono de' Magnalis, I,”L'Arcadia 1 (1917) 1–18; “II,”L'Arcadia 2 (1918) 87–99; Idem, Vladimiro Zabughin,Vergilio nel Rinascimento Italiano da Dante a Torquato Tasso, 2 vols. (Bologna, 1921–23)I. 46–51 and 93–100, notes 224-55.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. L. Lord, “Virgil'sEclogues, Nicholas Trevet, and the Harmony of the Spheres,”Mediaeval Studies 54 (1992), 186–278.

    Google Scholar 

  21. —, 206–225; 267–73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. —, 225–227.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Latin citations from Boethius'sConsolatio are from the text revised by S. J. Tester, Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge-London) 1973. Benvenuto da Imola:Ecl. 2.22, MS Ottob. Lat. 1262, fol. 9r,a.

  24. Ecl. 6.61, Ottob. Lat. 1262, fol. 33v,a.

  25. Geor. 1.30, Ottob. Lat. 1262, fol. 55v,a.

  26. MS Vindob. Pal. Lat. 28, fol. 1r.

  27. See Anna Crabbe, “Literary Design in theDe Consolatione Philosophiae,” in:Boethius: His Life, Thought and Influence, ed. Margaret Gibson (Oxford, 1981) 261.

  28. Cons. II Pr. 9.99–101 (S.J. Tester, 1973);Timaeus 27c. See Tester's notesa andb, pp. 270–271.

  29. Vindob. Pal. Lat. 28, fol. 2r, with the readingcontenta from MS Med. Laur. 53.25. This same passage from Boethius is cited by Zono again, Vindob. Pal. Lat. 28, 4r.

  30. Vindob. Pal. Lat. 28, fol. 4v.

  31. For bibliography on this theme, see M. L. Lord, “A commentary onAeneid 6: Ciones de Magnali, not Nicholas Trevet,”Medievalia et Humanistica n.s. 15 (1987) 149–50 and notes 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vindob. Pal. Lat. 28, fol. 128v.

  33. Ibid. Vondob. Pal. Lat. 28, fol. 128v.

  34. Ibid. Vindob. Pal. Lat. 28, fol. 129r. Zono cites this passage also onAen. 6.376.

  35. P. de Nolhac, “Pétrarque et l'Humanisme,” I. 156–158.

  36. A. A. Nascimento and Díaz de Bustamante,Nicholás Trivet Anglico, 206–209.

  37. P. Toynbee, “Index of Authors Quoted by Benvenuto da Imola in his Commentary on theDivina Commedia,” in:Eighteenth and Nineteenth Annual Reports of the Dante Society, Cambridge, Mass. 1899–1900 (Boston, 1901) 1–44.

  38. F. Ghisalberti,Le Chiose Virgiliane, 66–71.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 23 Francis Avenue, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Mary Louise Lord

Authors
  1. Mary Louise Lord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This article is based on a paper given at the Third Meeting of the International Society for the Classical Tradition (ISCT), held at Boston University, March 8–12, 1995.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lord, M.L. The use of macrobius and boethius in some fourteeth-century commentaries on Virgil. International Journal of the Classical Tradition 3, 3–22 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02676901

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02676901

Keywords

Search

Navigation