Skip to main content
Log in

Popper, kuhn, lakatos and aim-oriented empiricism

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Cartwright, N. (1999)The Dappled World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, J. (1995)The Disorder of Things, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1965) “Problems of Empiricism”, I, in C. Colodny, ed.,Beyond the Edge of Certainty, University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 145–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1978)Against Method, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. (1986)The Neglect of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990)Experiment: Right or Wrong, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C. (1980)Theory and Evidence Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1973)Thematic Origins of Modern Science Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, G. A. (1987)A Realistic Theory of Science, Albany, State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1993)Scientific Reasoning, La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (1988)Science as a Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1993)The Advancement of Science, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (first published in 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1977)The Essential Tension, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I., (1970) “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 91–195.

  • — (1978)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, ed. J. Worrall and G. Currie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., eds., (1970)Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1984)Science and Values, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (1972) “A Critique of Popper's Views of Scientific Method,”Philosophy of Science 39, pp. 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1974) “The Rationality of Scientific Discovery”,Philosophy of Science 41, pp. 123–153 and 247–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1979) “Induction, Simplicity and Scientific Progress”,Scientia, 114, pp. 629–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984)From Knowledge to Wisdom, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1993) “Induction and Scientific Realism: Einstein versus van Fraassen”,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44, pp. 61–79, 81–101, and 275–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1997) “Must Science Make Cosmological Assumptions if it is to be Rational?”, inThe Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Irish Philosophical Society Spring Conference, ed., T. Kelly, Irish Philosophical Society, Maynooth, pp. 98–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998)The Comprehensibility of the Universe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999) “Has Science Established that the Universe is Comprehensible?”,Cogito 13, pp. 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2000) “A new conception of science”,Physics World 13, No. 8, pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2002a) “Is Science Neurotic?”Metaphilosophy 33, pp. 259–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2002b) “The Need for a Revolution in the Philosophy of Science,”Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33, pp. 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2005)Is Science Neurotic?, London: Imperial College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, J. W. (1996)Beauty and Revolution in Science, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1974) “Popper's Qualitative Theory of Verisimilitude”,Britihs Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, pp. 166–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, A. (1993)Common Sence, Science and Scepticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. (1962)Principia, vol. II trans. A. Motte and F. Cajori, California: California University Press (first published 1687).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nola, R. and Sankey, H. (2000) “A Selective Survey of Theories of Scientific Method”, in R. Nola and H. Sankey (eds.)After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, J. (1965)The Measure of the Universe, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959)The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1961)The Poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1963)Conjectures and Refutations, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1970) “Normal Science and its Dangers”, in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 51–58.

  • — (1972)Objective Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1974) “Replies to Critics”, in P.A. Schilpp, ed.,The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, vol. 2, pp. 961–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1982)Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1983)Realism and the Aim of Science, London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.J.C. (1963)Philosophy and Scientific Realism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, P. (1974) “On Popper's Definition of Versimilitude”,British Journal for the philosophy of Science 35, pp. 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B. (1980)The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. (1984)Science and Scepticism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. S. et al. (1957)Physical Review 105, p. 1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maxwell, N. Popper, kuhn, lakatos and aim-oriented empiricism. Philosophia 32, 181–239 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02641621

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02641621

Keywords

Navigation