Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing electronic collaborative learning environments

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electronic collaborative learning environments for learning and working are in vogue. Designers design them according to their own constructivist interpretations of what collaborative learning is and what it should achieve. Educators employ them with different educational approaches and in diverse situations to achieve different ends. Students use them, sometimes very enthusiastically, but often in a perfunctory way. Finally, researchers study them and—as is usually the case when apples and oranges are compared—find no conclusive evidence as to whether or not they work, where they do or do not work, when they do or do not work and, most importantly, why, they do or do not work. This contribution presents an affordance framework for such collaborative learning environments; an interaction design procedure for designing, developing, and implementing them; and an educational affordance approach to the use of tasks in those environments. It also presents the results of three projects dealing with these three issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alben, L. (1997). At the heart of interaction design.Design Management Journal, 8(3), 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B. S., & Otto, R. G. (1996). Media as lived environments: The ecological psychology of educational technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 199–226). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A. & Kirschner, P. A. (2003, August). Negotiating shared understanding in collaborative problem solving. In S. Järvelä & F. Fischer (Chairs),Awareness and shared understanding of distributed collaboration: Analysis and facilitation. Paper presented in a symposium conducted at the 10th EARLI biennial meeting, Padova, Italy.

  • Bly, S., Harrison, S., & Irwin, S. (1993). Media spaces: Bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment.Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonito, J. A. (2002). The analysis of participation in small groups: Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence.Small Group Research, 33, 412–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. (2000). Beyond one's own perspective: The psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.),Practicing interdisciplinarity (pp. 115–133). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T. A. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines.Educational Technology, Research & Development, 46(3), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse.Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1988). When teaching kills learning: Research on mathemathantics. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, N. Bennett & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.),Learning and instruction: European research in an international context (Vol. 2.2., pp. 1–22). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. J., & Weil, W. (1997)Wicked problems: Naming the pain in organizations. Retrieved January 16, 2003, from http://www.touchstone.com/tr/wp/ wicked.html.

  • Donath, J. (1997).Inhabiting the virtual city: The design of social environments for electronic communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A. (1989). The written world: On the theory and practice of computer conferencing. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.),Mindwave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 22–39). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlizzi, J., & Ford, S. (2000). The building blocks of experience: An early framework for interaction designers. In D. Boyarski & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.),Conference proceedings on designing interactive systems: Processes, practice, methods, and techniques (pp. 419–423). New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1999).Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In S. P. Robertson, G. M. Olson & J. S. Olson (Eds.),Proceedings of the CHI'91 conference on human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology (pp. 79–84). New Orleans, LA: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw, & J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences.International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 115–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. (1981). Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education.Educational Research, 10, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1017–1044). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 371–396). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Information presentation and troubleshooting in electrical circuits.International Journal of Science Education, 26, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. Kirschner (Ed.),Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (7–47). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In P. Dillenbourg (Seried Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner & R. L. Martens (Vol. Eds.),Computer-supported collaborative learning: Vol 3. What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 3–30). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Van Merriënboer, J., Carr, C. S., & Sloep, P. (2002). How expert designers design.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(4), 86–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborative groups.Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003, August). Supporting social interaction for group dynamics through social affordances in CSCL: Group awareness widgets. In P. A. Kirschner (Chair),The social psychological dimension of social interaction and the effects of cultural backgrounds in CSCL. Paper presented in a symposium conducted at the 10th EARLI biennial meeting, Padova, Italy.

  • Kreijns, K., & Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Group awareness widgets for enhancing social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: Design and implementation. In D. Budny & G. Bjedov (Eds.),Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 436–442). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments.Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1989). On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that'design is making sense (of things).Design Issues, 5(2), 9–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löwgren, J. (2002). Just how far beyond HCI is interaction design. Retrieved February 28, 2003, from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/0025 89.php.

  • Martens, R. (1998).The use and effects of embedded support devices in independent learning. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol 2., pp. 141–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., Mason, R. O., & Bonoma, T. V. (1976). Psychological assumptions, experimentation and real world problems.Evaluation Quarterly, 2(4), 639–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.),Constructivist learning environments (pp. 107–119). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrack, P. E., & Farrell, G. M. (1995). An examination of functional role behaviour and its consequences for individuals in group settings.Small Group Research, 26, 542–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, A. J., Höök, K., & Benyon, D. (1999).Social navigation of information space. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadolski, R. J., Kirschner, P. A., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Hummel, H. G. K. (2001). A model for optimizing step size of learning tasks in Competency-based Multimedia Practicals.Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993/1994b). Usability engineering. San Fransisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. (Original work published 1993, Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noldus. (2003). Noldus Observer R (Version 4) [Computer software]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Noldus Information Technology bv.

  • Norman, D. A. (1988).The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1992).Turn signals are the facial expressions of automobiles. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (2002). Emotion & design: Attractive things work better.Interactions, 9(4), 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning to do and learning to understand. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.),Learning in humans and machines (pp. 37–62). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. A. (1991).A meta-analysis of learner control in computer-based learning environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002).Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Beyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994).Human-computer interaction. Workingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of learner control research.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(2), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.) (1999).Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, R. (2001). So you want to be an interaction designer.Newsletter.2001(6). Retrieved February 28, 2003, from http://www.cooper.com/newsletters/ 2001_06/2001_06_newsletter.htm.

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973/1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In N. Cross (Ed.),Developments in design methodology (pp. 135–144). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. (Originally published as part of Dilemmas in a general theory of planning,Policy Sciences, 4, 1973, 155–169).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1989). In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: Issues concerning external validity, media replications and learner control.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 37(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shedroff, N. (2001).Experience design. Indianapolis, IN: New readers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976).The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyu, H. Y., & Brown, S. W., (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning?International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(2), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning in teams: State of the art.Educational Psychologist, 15, 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995).Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.) Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J., (1999).Multilevel analysis. Londen: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J., (1996).Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd. ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning.Computers & Education, 24, 403–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J., (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modelling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups.Small Group Research, 35, 195–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R., & Prins, F., (2003). Content analysis: What are they talking about? In B. Wasson, R. Baggetun, U. Hoppe & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.),CSCL 2003: Community events, communication and interaction (pp. 74–76). Bergen: Intermedia, University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (in press). Content analysis: What are they talking about?Computers & Education.

  • Tammelin, M. (1998). From telepresence to social presence: The role of presence in a network-based learning environment. In S. Tella (Eds.),Aspects of media education: Vol. 8. Strategic imperatives in the information age (pp. 219–231). Helsinki, Finland: Media Education Centre, University of Helsinki, Media Education Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, J. (2001, June) Why is interaction design so important?In the Bubble. Retrieved February 28, 2003, from http://www.doorsofperception.com/In+the+Bubble/details/17/

  • Tu, C. H., (2000). On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment.Journal of Network and Computer Application, 23(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C. H. (2002). The impacts of text-based CMC on online social presence.The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C. H., & Isaacs, M., (2002). An examination of social presence to increase interaction in online classes.American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997).Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Three worlds of instructional design: State of the art and future directions.Instructional Science, 29, 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wexelblat, A., & Maes, P. (1999). Footprints: Historyrich tools for information foraging. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: The CHI is the limit (pp. 270–277). New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Educational Technology Expertise Center at the Open University of the Netherlands in Heerlen, The Netherlands

    Paul Kirschner, Jan-Willem Strijbos, Karel Kreijns & Pieter Jelle Beers

Authors
  1. Paul Kirschner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan-Willem Strijbos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karel Kreijns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pieter Jelle Beers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirschner, P., Strijbos, JW., Kreijns, K. et al. Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. ETR&D 52, 47–66 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504675

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504675

Keywords

Search

Navigation