Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual variation in the ability of Columbian ground squirrels to select an optimal diet

  • Papers
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus) were examined for ability to select a diet that maximizes daily energy intake (optimal diet) under free-living field conditions. The optimal diet for each squirrel was determined given constraints (e.g. body size, feeding time) on individual foraging behavior. Most squirrels (63%) consumed a diet not significantly different from one that would maximize their daily energy intake. The remainder (37%) approached an energy maximized diet but appeared to make some incorrect foraging decisions. Both males and females appeared to approach energy maximized diets. An individual's deviation from its optimal diet is relatively constant within a season and not significantly affected by immediate environmental influences such as food abundance, thermal conditions and social environment. The energy cost of deviating from an optimal diet may be large enough to affect fitness. These results suggest that the ability to select an optimal diet can be viewed as a behavioral trait that might be subject to natural selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, S. J. (1977). Polymorphism and geographic variation in the feeding behavior of the garter snake,Thamnophis elegans.Science 197, 676–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J. (1981). The microevolution of feeding behavior. InForaging Behavior: Ecological, Ethological, and Psychological Approaches(A. C. Kamil and J. D. Sargent,eds.), Garland Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky, G. E. (1978) Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose.Theor. Pop. Biol. 14, 105–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky, G. E. (1984) Herbivore optimal foraging: a comparative test of three models.Amer. Natur. 124, 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky, G. E. (1986) Optimal foraging and community structure: implications for a guild of generalist grassland herbivores.Oecologia 70, 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky, G. E. and Ritchie, M. E. (1989) Geographical and seasonal variation in foraging of Columbian ground squirrels.Oecologia (in press).

  • Belovsky, G. E. and Slade, J. B. (1986) Time budgets of grassland herbivores: body size similarities.Oecologia 70, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boag, D. A. and Murie, J. O. (1981a) Weight in relation to sex, age, and season in Columbian ground squirrels (Sciuridae: Rodentia).Canad. J. Zool. 59, 999–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boag, D. A. and Murie, J. O. (1981b) Population ecology of Columbian ground squirrels in southwestern Alberta.Canad. J. Zool. 59, 2230–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. (1976) Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid.Amer. Natur. 110, 141–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, F. S. and Kjelgaard, J. D. (1985) The influence of food resources on population dynamics in Columbian ground squirrels.Canad. J. Zool. 63: 2105–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. M. (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference.Amer. Natur. 100, 611–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. A. (1986)Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R. M., Foppe, T. M., Gilbert, M. B., Clark, R. C. and Reynolds, H. W. (1977)The Microhistological Analysis of Feces as an Estimator of Herbivore Diet. Composition Analysis Lab, Colorado State University, Ft Collins, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon, M. A. (1982) Energy maximizers and time minimizers: theory and reality.Amer. Natur. 119, 596–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, A. I., Krebs, J. R. and Erichsen, J. T. (1980). Optimal prey choice and discrimination time in the great tit (Parus major L.).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6, 169–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. W. and Deavers, D. R. (1973) Metabolism, pulmo-cutaneous water loss and respiration of eight species of ground squirrels from different environments.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. (A)45, 69–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intriligator, M. D. (1971)Mathematical Optimization and Economic Theory. Columbia Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasov, W. H. (1981) Daily energy expenditure and the cost of activity in a free-living mammal.Oecologia 51, 253–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore, D. L. Jr and Armitage, K. B. (1978) Energetics of yellow-bellied marmot populations.Ecology 59, 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, M. (1961)The Fire of Life. Wiley Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., Ryan, J. C. and Charnov, E. L. (1974) Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging? A study in patch use by chickadees.Anim. Behav. 22, 953–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., Erichsen, J. T., Webber, M. I. and Charnov, E. L. (1977) Optimal prey selection in the Great Tit (Parus major).Anim. Behav. 25, 30–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, A. H. and Pianka, E. R. (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment.Amer. Natur. 100, 603–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manville, R. H. (1959) The Columbian ground squirrel in northwestern Montana.J. Mamm. 40, 26–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morhardt, S. S. (1975) Use of climate diagrams to describe microhabitats occupied by Belding ground squirrels and to predict rates of change of body temperature.InPerspectives in Biophysical Ecology (D. M. Gates and R. B. Schmerl, eds), pp. 303–23. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morhardt, S. S. and Gates, D. M. (1974) Energy exchange analysis of the Belding ground squirrel and its habitat.Ecol. Monog. 44, 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, M. L. and Sherman, P. W. (1978) Effects of a spring snowstorm on behavior, reproduction and survival of Belding's ground squirrels.Canad. J. Zool. 56, 2578–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, W. P. and Gates, D. M. (1969) Thermodynamic equilibria of animals with environment.Ecol. Monog. 39, 227–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H. R. (1974) On the theory of optimal diets.Amer. Natur. 108, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H. R. (1975) Diet optimization with nutrient constraints.Amer. Natur. 109, 765–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H. (1984) Optimal foraging: a critical review.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 523–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R. and Charnov, E. L. (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests.Q. Rev. Biol. 52, 137–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechten, C., Avery, M. I. and Stevens, T. A. (1983) Optimal prey selection: why do great tits show partial preferences?.Anim. Behav. 31, 576–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, M. E. Optimal foraging and fitness in Columbian ground squirrels. (submitted).

  • Schitoskey, F. and Woodmansee, S. R. (1978) Energy requirements and the diet of the California ground squirrel.J. Wildlife Mgemnt. 42, 373–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1971) Theory of feeding strategies.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2, 369–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. T. (1925) The food of ground squirrels.Amer. Natur. 59, 250–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth, S. J. (1984) Learning and behavioural ecology. InBehavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach 2nd edn. (J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds), pp. 170–94. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L. B. and Rapoport, A. (1974) An optimal strategy of evolution.Q. Rev. Biol. 49, 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, D. R. and Malechek, J. C. (1968) Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscopic technique.J. Range Mgemnt. 21, 264–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W. and Krebs, J. R. (1986)Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storr, G. M. (1963) Estimation of dry matter intake in wild herbivores.Nature 197, 307–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. C. H. (1979) Time patterns and metabolic rates of natural torpor in the Richardson's ground squirrel.Canad. J. Zool. 57, 149–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. R. (1980) Environmental harshness, heat stress, andMarmota flaviventris.Oecologia 44, 390–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. and Hall, D. J. (1974) Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus).Ecology 55, 1042–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby, M. (1974) An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores.Amer. Natur. 108, 209–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, 48109-1115, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Mark E. Ritchie

Authors
  1. Mark E. Ritchie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritchie, M.E. Individual variation in the ability of Columbian ground squirrels to select an optimal diet. Evol Ecol 2, 232–252 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214285

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214285

Keywords

Search

Navigation