Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A remark on a certain consequence of connexive logic for Zermelo's set theory

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. See, eg., Nicholas Rescher:Many-valued Logic McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1969, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, eg., “The Pure Calculus of Entailment”,The Journal of Symbolic Logic March 1962, p. 19c.

  3. I have argued this matter elsewhere and will not discuss it here. See my “Inferability and Deducibility”,Mind, January 1973, “Material Implication and ‘If … then …’”Inernational Logic Review, December 1972.

  4. See “Connexive Implication and the Syllogism”,Mind, July 1967. Also see McCall's “Connexive Implication”,The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1966.

  5. E.J. Lemmon:Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1969, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, university of Ghana, Legon

    J. E. Wiredu

Authors
  1. J. E. Wiredu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Allatum est die 2 Februarii 1973

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiredu, J.E. A remark on a certain consequence of connexive logic for Zermelo's set theory. Stud Logica 33, 127–130 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02120489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02120489

Keywords

Search

Navigation