Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique (Imagen) and two enzyme immunoassay (EIA) techniques (Chlamydiazyme and IDEIA) were compared for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens from 502 attenders at a genitourinary medicine clinic. Eighty-two attenders were regarded as infected: 67 with positive results by at least two of the three techniques and 15 by virtue of elementary bodies detected in stored EIA buffer samples. With a positivity criterion of ≥ 6 bodies Imagen was 76% sensitive for men and 61% sensitive for women. The sensitivity of Chlamydiazyme was 73% for men and 90% for women; comparative values for IDEIA were 80% and 71%, respectively. All three techniques were over 98% specific. Sampling order appeared to influence the sensitivity of IDEIA for specimens from men. All three techniques were less sensitive in the absence of cervicitis. The performances of the EIA techniques compared favourably with that of the more established technique of DIF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander, I., Paul, I. D., Caul, E. O.: Evaluation of a genus reactive monoclonal antibody in rapid identification ofChlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence. Genitourinary Medicine 1985, 61: 252–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tam, M. R., Stamm, W. E., Handsfield, H. H., Stephens, R., Kuo, C.-C., Holmes, K. K., Ditzenberger, K., Krieger, M., Nowinski, R. C.: Culture-independent diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies. New England Journal of Medicine 1984, 310: 1146–1150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stamm, W. E., Harrison, H. R., Alexander, E. R., Cles, L. D., Spence, M. R., Quinn, T. C.: Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis infections by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretions. Annals of Internal Medicine 1984, 101: 638–641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas, B. J., Evans, R. T., Hawkins, D. A., Taylor-Robinson, D.: Sensitivity of detectingChlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1984, 37: 812–816.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsen, J. H., Wulf, H. C., Friis-Møller, A.: Comparison of a fluorescent monoclonal antibody assay and a tissue culture assay for routine detection of infections caused byChlamydia trachomatis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 5: 554–558.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Monoharan, V., Hammond, P.: Comparison of immunofluorescence and culture methods in the diagnosis of chlamydial infections. Genitourinary Medicine 1986, 62: 205–206.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grillner, L., Beckman, S., Hammar, H.: Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 5: 559–562.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forbes, B. A., Bartholoma, N., McMillan, J., Roefaro, M., Weiner, L., Welych, L.: Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody test to detect chlamydia in cervical and urethral specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 23: 1136–1137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chernesky, M. A., Mahony, J. B., Castriciano, S., Mores, M., Stewart, I. O., Landis, S. J., Siedelman, W., Sargeant, E. J., Leman, C.: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1986, 154: 141–148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lipkin, E. S., Moncada, J. V., Shafer, M.-A., Wilson, T. E., Schachter, J.: Comparison of monoclonal antibody staining and culture in diagnosing cervical chlamydial infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 23: 114–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hipp, S. S., Han, Y., Murphy, D.: Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1987, 25: 1938–1943.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tilton, R. C., Judson, F. N., Barnes, R. C., Gruninger, R. P., Ryan, R. W., Steingrimsson, O.: Multicenter comparative evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in patient specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 167–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mumtaz, G., Mellars, B. J., Ridgway, G. L., Oriel, J. D.: Enzyme immunoassay for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis antigen in urethral and endocervical swabs. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1985, 38: 740–742.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Howard, L. V., Coleman, P. F., England, B. J., Herrmann, J. E.: Evaluation of Chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused byChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 23: 329–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy, R. A., Warford, A. L.: Evaluation of the modified Chlamydiazyme immunoassay for the detection of chlamydial antigen. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1986, 86: 330–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pothier, P., Kazmierczak, A.: Comparison of cell culture with two direct chlamydia tests using immunofluorescence or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 5: 569–572.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan-Capner, P., Hudson, P., Cansfield, J. A., Saeed, A.: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis by enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, and cell culture. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1986, 39: 232.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wiesmeier, E., Bruckner, D. A., Malotte, C. K., Manduke, L.: Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they? Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 1988, 9: 219–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohanty, K. C., O'Neill, J. J., Hambling, M. H.: Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and cell culture for detectingChlamydia trachomatis. Genitourinary Medicine 1986, 62: 175–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Caul, E. O., Paul, I. D.: Monoclonal antibody based ELISA for detectingChlamydia trachomatis. Lancet 1985, i: 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pugh, S. F., Slack, R. C. B., Caul, E. O., Paul, I. D., Appleton, P. N., Gatley, S.: Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1985, 38: 1139–1141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor-Robinson, D., Thomas, B. J., Osborn, M. F.: Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for detectingChlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1987, 40: 194–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tjiam, K. H., van Heijst, B. Y. M., van Zuuren, A., Wagenvoort, J. H. T., van Joost, T., Stolz, E., Michel, M. F.: Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections in urogenital specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 23: 752–754.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ridgway, G. L.: The laboratory diagnosis of chlamydial infection. In: Oriel, D., Ridgway, G., Schachter, J., Taylor-Robinson, D., Ward, M. (ed.): Chlamydial infections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986, p. 539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schachter, J.: Biology ofChlamydia trachomatis. In: Holmes, K. K. (ed.): Sexually transmitted diseases. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984, p. 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tjiam, K. H., van Eijk, R. V. W., van Heijst, B. Y. M., Tideman, G. J., van Joost, T., Stolz, E., Michel, M. F.: Evaluation of the direct fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of chlamydial infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 4: 548–552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kent, G. P., Harrison, H. R., Berman, S. M., Keenlyside, R. A.: Screening forChlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: comparison of diagnostic tests with clinical and historical risk factors. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1988, 15: 51–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Ulsen, J., van Zuuren —van der Horst, A., Tjiam, K. H., van der Heijst, Y., Michel, M. F., van Eijk, R. V. W., van Joost, T., Stolz, E.: Solid phase enzyme immunoassay for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 4: 397–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunlop, E. M., Goh, B. T., Darougar, S., Woodland, R.: Triple-culture tests for diagnosis of chlamydial infection of the female genital tract. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1985, 12: 68–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Munday, P. E., Carder, J. M., Hanna, N. F., Taylor-Robinson, D.: Is one swab enough to detect chlamydial infection of the cervix? British Journal of Venereal Diseases 1984, 60: 384–386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor-Robinson, D., Tuffrey, M.: Comparison of detection procedures forChlamydia trachomatis, including enzyme immunoassays, in a mouse model of genital infection. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1987, 24: 169–173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology, Horton General Hospital, Oxford Road, OX16 9AL, Banbury, UK

    C. J. Hall & C. Nelder

Authors
  1. C. J. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Nelder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, C.J., Nelder, C. Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 8, 866–870 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01963772

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01963772

Keywords

Search

Navigation