Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of cattle grazing and haying on wildlife conservation at National Wildlife Refuges in the United States

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The National Wildlife Refuge System is perhaps the most important system of federal lands for protecting wildlife in the United States. Only at refuges has wildlife conservation been legislated to have higher priority than either recreational or commercial activities. Presently, private ranchers and farmers graze cattle on 981,954 ha and harvest hay on 12,021 ha at 123 National Wildlife Refuges. US Fish and Wildlife Service policy is to permit these uses primarily when needed to benefit refuge wildlife. To evaluate the success of this policy, I surveyed grassland management practices at the 123 refuges. The survey results indicate that in fiscal year 1980 there were 374,849 animal unit months (AUMs) of cattle grazing, or 41% more than was reported by the Fish and Wildlife Service. According to managers' opinions, 86 species of wildlife are positively affected and 82 are negatively affected by refuge cattle grazing or haying. However, quantitative field studies of the effect of cattle grazing and haying on wildlife coupled with the survey data on how refuge programs are implemented suggest that these activities are impeding the goal of wildlife conservation. Particular management problems uncovered by the survey include overgrazing of riparian habitats, wildlife mortality due to collisions with cattle fences, and mowing of migratory bird habitat during the breeding season. Managers reported that they spend $919,740 administering cattle grazing and haying; thus refuge grazing and haying programs are also expensive. At any single refuge these uses occupy up to 50% of refuge funds and 55% of staff time. In light of these results, prescribed burning may be a better wildlife management option than is either cattle grazing or haying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Berry, K. H. 1978. Livestock grazing and the desert tortoise.Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 43:505–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicak, T. K., R. L. Redmond, and D. A. Jenni. 1982. Effects of grazing on long-billed curlew (Numenius americanus) breeding behavior and ecology in southwestern Idaho. Pages 74–85in J. M. Peek and P. D. Dalke (eds.), Wildlife-livestock relationships symposium: proceedings 10. University of Idaho Forest, Wildlife, and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, Idaho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C. E., K. W. Harmon, J. A. Jackson, and C. D. Littlefield. 1978. Management of national wildlife refuges in the US: its impacts on birds.Wilson Bulletin 90:309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. E. 1978. Grazing, grassland cover and gamebirds.Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 43:477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bue, G., L. Blankenship, and W. H. Marshall. 1952. The relationship of grazing practices to waterfowl breeding populations and production on stock ponds in western South Dakota.Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 17:39–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bue, I. G., H. G. Uhlig, and J. D. Smith. 1964. Stock ponds and dugouts. Pages 391–398in J. P. Linduska (ed.), Waterfowl tomorrow. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, H. H., H. H. Prince, and D. L. Trauger. 1965. Blue-winged teal nesting success as related to land use.Journal of Wildlife Management 29:89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capel, S. W. 1965. The relationship between grazing and predator activity in four types of waterfowl nesting cover. MA thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 78 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, S. W. 1977. Importance, preservation, and management of riparian habitats: an overview.In R. R. Johnson and D. A. Jones (eds.), Importance, preservation, and management of riparian habitat: a symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-43.

  • Clark, J. 1977. Effects of experimental management schemes on production and nesting ecology of ducks at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. MS thesis, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 66 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • CVWMA. 1974. Habitat requirements for ground-nesting waterfowl and effect of grazing and other cover removal activities on nesting. Creston Valley Wildlife Management Authority, Box 640, Creston, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deubbert, H. F., and J. T. Lokemoen. 1977. Upland nesting of American bitterns, marsh hawks, and short-eared owls.Prairie Naturalist 9:33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellisor, J. E.. 1969. Mobility of white-tailed deer in south Texas.Journal of Wildlife Management 33:221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWS. 1976. Final environmental statement on the operation of the National Wildlife Refuge system. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWS. 1980a. Land use and economic benefits. FY 1980. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWS. 1980b. Annual narrative report: Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. Austwell, Texas.

  • FWS. 1980c. Final environmental impact statement, Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWS. 1981. Kofa National Wildlife Refuge final environmental impact statement: proposal to eliminate cattle and wild burros on Kofa National Wildlife Refuge. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 108 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWS. 1982. Refuge manual (6 RM 9.1). US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • FWS. 1984. Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge draft environmental impact statement. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwalt, L. A. 1978. The National Wildlife Refuge system. Pages 399–412in H. P. Brokaw (ed.), Wildlife and America. Council on Environmental Quality, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. E., and J. M. Inglis. 1974. Behavioral responses of white-tailed deer to intensive ranching operations.Journal of Wildlife Management 38:488–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holechek, J. L., R. Valdez, S. D. Schemnitz, R. D. Pieper, and C. A. Davis. 1982. Manipulation of grazing to improve or maintain wildlife habitat.Wildlife Society Bulletin 10:204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, L. R., and R. A. Hunt. 1964. Duck and coot ecology and management in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Conservation Technical Bulletin 33, 212 pp.

  • Jantzen, R. A. 1983. Memorandum: Guidelines for implementing compatible public and economic use expansion on National Wildlife Refuges. Dated 1 April 1983. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, W. B., and R. P. Bosch. 1982. Sharp-tailed grouse and range management practices in western rangelands. Pages 133–146in J. M. Peek and P. D. Dalke (eds.), Wildlife-livestock relationships symposium: proceedings 10. University of Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, Idaho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, L. M. 1969. Waterfowl production in relation to grazing.Journal of Wildlife Management 33:821–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, L. M. 1974. Habitat management considerations for prairie chickens.Wildlife Society Bulletin 2:124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, L. M., H. F. Deubbert, and A. D. Kruse. 1978. Grazing and haying effects on habitats of upland nesting birds.Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 43:486–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, L. M., and K. F. Higgins. 1976. Upland sandpiper nesting and management in North Dakota.Wildlife Society Bulletin 4:16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, L. M., and A. D. Kruse. 1973. Prairie fires and wildlife.Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecological Conference 12:289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimstra, W. D., and J. L. Roseberry. 1975. Nesting ecology of the bobwhite in southern Illinois.Wildlife Monographs 41, 37 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoppf, F. L., and R. W. Cannon. 1982. Structural resilience of a willow riparian community to changes in grazing practices. Pages 198–207in J. M. Peak and P. D. Dalke (eds.), Wildlife-livestock relationships symposium: proceedings 10. University of Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, Idaho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlefield, C. D., R. S. Johnstone, and S. P. Thompson. 1979. Winter hunting activity of marsh and rough-legged hawks as related to land use on the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon. Paper presented at the Raptor Research Annual Meeting, 8–12 November 1979, Davis, California.

  • Mackie, R.J. 1978. Impacts of livestock grazing on wild ungulates.Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 43:462–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, C. A., and C. W. Ramsey. 1965. Response of deer and livestock to controlled grazing in Central Texas.Journal of Range Management 18:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, M. E., and B. W. O'Gara. 1982. Cattle-pronghorn interactions during the fawning season in northwestern Nevada. Pages 593–606in J. M. Peek and P. D. Dalke (eds.), Wildlife-livestock relationships symposium: proceedings 10. University of Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, Idaho.

    Google Scholar 

  • NWR Task Force. 1979. Recommendations. Page 9in Final recommendations on the management of the National Wildlife Refuge system. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, W. J., and P. G. Risser. 1980. Impact of management practices on the tallgrass prairie.Oecologia (Berlin) 46:223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S. 1978. Livestock interactions with fish and aquatic environments: problems in evaluation.Transactions of the North American Wildlife Natural Resources Conference 43:498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S. 1981. Streamside management to protect bank-channel stability and aquatic life. Pages 245–255in D. M. Baumgartner (ed.), Interior west watershed management: proceedings of a symposium. Cooperative Extension, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, W. H., and C. E. Cushing. 1982. Recovery of streamside woody vegetation after exclusion of livestock grazing.Journal of Range Management 35:360–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salyer, J. W. 1962. Effects of drought and land use on prairie nesting ducks.North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 27:69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, M. 1979. Rangeland condition. Pages 29–33in Rangeland policies for the future: proceedings of a symposium, 28–31 January, 1979, Tucson, Arizona. USDA-USDI, CEQ. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., GTRWO-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. 1977. Conclusions.In Proceedings of a seminar on improving fish and wildlife benefits in range management. Biological Services Program, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC., FWS OBS-77/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, L. A., T. W. Box, and A. R. Smith. 1975. Range management, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 532 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann, B. I. 1983. Grazing programs on federal rangelands and refuges: consequences for wildlife, beef production, and fossil fuel use. MS thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 167 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1981. Agricultural statistics. Statistical Reporting Service, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., 981 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuren, D. 1982. Comparative ecology of bison and cattle in the Henry Mountains, Utah. Pages 449–457in J. M. Peek and P. D. Dalke (eds.), Wildlife-livestock relationships symposium: proceedings 10. University of Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, Idaho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl, R. J. 1974. Effects of fire on grasslands. Pages 139–194in T. T. Kozlowske and C. E. Ahlgren (eds.), Fire and ecosystems. Academic Press, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, F. H. 1978. Livestock grazing and the livestock industry. Pages 121–145in H. P. Brokaw (ed.), Wildlife and America. Council on Environmental Quality, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, B. K., and A. L. Merrill. 1963. Composition of foods. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Agricultural Handbook no. 8. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., 190 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. W., B. H. Wingfield, and J. P. Low. 1958. Effects of habitat deterioration on bird populations of a small Utah marsh.Condor 60:220–226.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strassmann, B.I. Effects of cattle grazing and haying on wildlife conservation at National Wildlife Refuges in the United States. Environmental Management 11, 35–44 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867177

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867177

Key words

Navigation