Abstract
Although many scholars in literature currently seem mainly interested in theory, the focus on literary texts is what defines literature studies. Computer technology and the statistical methods it fosters are applicable to both the theoretical and to the interpretative issues which scholars of literature habitually address. Genette's distinction between the homodiegetic and the autodiegetic perspective in first-person narrative can be confirmed statistically. Roquentin's loneliness inLa nausée can be shown to be a formal characteristic of the type of novel he narrates, thus validating his commentary on his society. The computer can be used to deal with standard literary questions in a principled fashion, and a new orientation of literature studies on a cultural history model, which Mark Olsen recommends, is not necessary.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albérès, R.M.Jean-Paul Sartre. 1953. Paris: Éditions Universitaires, 1967.
Bakhtin, M.The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
Barthes, Roland.Le degré zéro de l'écriture. Paris: Seuil, 1953.
Bernanos, G. Journal d'un curé de campagne. 1935.Oeuvres Romanesques. Éd. Albert Béguin. Paris: Gallimard, 1961.
Brainerd, Barron.Weighing Evidence in Language and Literature: A Statistical Approach. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974.
Brombert, V.The Intellectual Hero. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1961.
Brunet, Étienne.Le vocabulaire de Jean Giraudoux: Structure et évolution. Genève: Slatkine, 1978.
Brunet, Étienne.Le vocabulaire français de 1789 à nos jours. Genève: Slatkine, 1981.
Brunet, Étienne.Le vocabulaire de Proust. Genève: Slatkine, 1983.
Brunet, Étienne.Le vocabulaire de Victor Hugo. Paris: Champion, 1988.
Camus, Albert.L'étranger. 1942.Théâtre, récits, nouvelles. Éd. Roger Quilliot. Paris: Gallimard, 1962.
Camus, Albert.La chute. 1956.Théâtre, récits, nouvelles.
Céline, L.-F.Voyage au bout de la nuit. 1932.Romans. Paris: Gallimard, 1962.
Derrida, J.De la grammatologie. Paris: Minuit, 1967.
Engwall, G.Vocabulaire du roman français (1962–68): Dictionnaire des fréquences. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1984.
Falk, E.Types of Thematic Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Fortier, P.A. “Some Statistics of Themes in the French Novel.”Computers and the Humanities, 23 (1989), 293–99.
Fortier, P.A. and J.C. McConnell.THEME: A System for Computer-Aided Theme Searches of French Texts. Winnipeg: Department of French and Spanish, University of Manitoba, 1975.
Genette, Géard. “Discours du récit.”Figures III. Paris: Seuil, 1972.
Gibaldi, J., ed.Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures. New York: MLA, 1992.
Gide, André.L'immoraliste. 1902.Romans, récits, soties, oeuvres lyriques. Éds. Y. Davet and J.-J. Thierry. Paris: Gallimard, 1958.
Gide, André.La porte étroite. 1909.Romans, récits, soties, oeuvres lyriques.
Halliday, M.A.K.Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold, 1978.
Jameson, F.Sartre: The Origins of a Style. New Haven, N.J.: Yale University Press, 1961.
Juilland, A.et al. Frequency Dictionary of French Words. La Haye: Mouton, 1970.
Kern, E.Existential Thought and Fictional Technique. New Haven, N.J.: Yale University Press, 1970.
Lacan, Jacques.Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966.
Malhotra, A.K.Jean-Paul Sartre's Existentialism in Nausea and Being and Nothingness. Calcutta: Writers Workshop, 1978.
Malraux, André.Les conquérants. 1928.Romans. Paris: Gallimard, 1947.
Manser, A.R.Sartre: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966.
Mauriac, François.Le noeud de vipères. Paris: Grasset, 1932.
Mendel, S. “From Solitude to Salvation: A Study in Development.”Yale French Studies, 30 (1963), 45–55.
Muller, Charles.Essai de statistique lexicale: L'illusion comique de Pierre Corneille. Paris: Klincksieck, 1964.
Muller, Charles.Étude de statistique lexicale: Le vocabulaire du théâtre de Pierre Corneille. Paris: Larousse, 1967.
Muller, Charles.Principes et méthodes de statistique lexicale. Paris: Hachette, 1977.
Nizan, Paul. Review ofLa nausée. 1938.Les critiques de notre temps et Sartre. Éd. Jacques Lecarme. Paris: Garnier, 1973, pp. 35–36.
Prince, G. “Literary Theory and the Undergraduate Curriculum.”Profession 84 (1984), 37–40.
Proust, Marcel.La fugitive. 1925.À la recherche du temps perdu. Éds. Pierre Clarac et André Ferré. 3 vols. Paris: Gallimard, 1954.
Riffaterre, Michael.Essais de stylistique structurale. Paris: Flammarion, 1971.
Saisselin, R.G. “Bouville ou l'anti-Combray.”French Review, 33 (1960), 232–38.
Sartre, Jean-Paul.La nausée. 1938.Oeuvres Romanesques. Éds. Michel Contat and Michel Rybalka. Paris: Gallimard, 1981.
Snow, C. P.Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Paul A. Fortier is Distinguished Professor of French at the University of Manitoba and Vice-President of the Association for Computers and the Humanities. He has published extensively on the twentieth century French novel and on the use of computers and statistics for the study of literature.