Skip to main content
Log in

Somatostatin analog Sandostatin and inhibition of tumor growth in patients with metastatic endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective study was performed to determine the efficacy of octreotide (Sandostatin®; SMS 201–995) 200 μg tid in controlling tumor growth. The study included 21 patients with metastasized endocrine GEP tumors: 6 gastrinomas, 8 carcinoid syndromes, 7 nonfunctioning tumors. Treatment was performed for 3 to 59 months (median 15 months). Evaluation of the response to octreotide was facilitated in 12 patients by a pretreatment observation period of 3 to 47 months (median 17 months) during which the natural growth behavior was determined. Based on the presence or absence of a control period prior to treatment, 5 patients were considered to be responders, 7 as questionable responders (no pretreatment phase available), and 9 as nonresponders. None of the 21 patients had documented shrinkage of the tumor mass. The most favorable response was tumor standstill. In all but one responder an escape to an initially favorable response occurred after 6 to 28 months (median 14 months). Proved inhibition of growth was paralleled by a reduction of serum and urine hormone parameters, whereas unaltered progression of tumor growth was observed also in the presence of hormone suppression. Tumor growth and hormone release was inhibited in the absence and presence of somatostatin receptors on the tumor. It is concluded that octreotide exerts a limited effect on metastatic GEP tumor growth. The evaluation of a response to octreotide is facilitated by an observation period prior to the drug that provides information on growth characteristics of the tumor. The presence of octreotide receptors does not predict the success of therapy.

Résumé

Par une étude prospective chez 21 patients, on a déterminé l'efficacité de 200 μg de sandostatine (SMS 201–995) pour contrôler la croissance tumorale d'une tumeur endocrine du pancréas-GEP métastasée: 6 gastrinomes, 8 tumeurs carcinoïdes et 7 tumeurs non-fonctionnelles. Le traitement a été donné pendant une médiane de 15 (3–59) mois. La réponse au traitement a été comparée á l'évolution naturelle des tumeurs endocrines chez 12 de ces patients avant tout traitement pendant une médiane de 17 (3–47) mois. Selon qu'il y a eu une période d'observation avant le traitement ou pas, on a considéré 5 patients comme des “répondeurs possibles”, 7 comme des “répondeurs douteux” et 9 comme des “non répondeurs”. Chez aucun des patients, la tumeur n'a diminué de volume. La réponse la plus favorable a été une stabilisation de la croissance tumorale. Chez tous les “répondeurs” sauf un, une réponse initiale favorable s'est soldée par un échec après une médiane de 14 (6–28) mois. Parallèlement á l'inhibition de la croissance, on a observé une réduction hormonale dans le sang et dans les urines. La croissance tumorale n'a pas été altérée même en cas de suppression hormonale. La croissance tumorale et le largage hormonal n'ont pas été corrélés avec la présence ou l'absence de récepteurs de la somatostatine sur la tumeur. On conclut que la sandostatine exerce un effet tout á fait éphémère sur la croissance métastatique des tumeurs GEP. L'évaluation de la réponse au traitement a été grandement facilité par la période d'observation pré-traitement. La présence de récepeurs á la somatostatine ne prédit pas le succès de la thérapeutique par la sandostatine.

Resumen

Se emprendió un estudio prospectivo con el propósito de determinar la eficacia de 200 ug de sandostatina (SMS 201–995) tres veces al dia en el control del crecimiento tumoral. El estudio incluye 21 pacientes con tumor gastroenteropancreático (GEP) metastásicos: 6 gastrinomas, 8 sindromes carcinoides, 7 tumores no funcionantes. El tratamiento tuvo una duración de 3–59 meses (media 15 meses). La evaluación de la respuesta a la sandostatina se facilitó en 12 pacientes por un periodo de observación anterior al tratamiento de 3–47 meses (media 17 meses), del cual se dedujo el comportamiento natural de su crecimiento. Con base en la presencia o ausencia de un periodo de control anterior al tratamiento, 5 pacientes fueron calificados como de respuesta positiva, 7 como de respuesta cuestionable (no hubo fase pretratamiento disponible) y 9 como de respuesta negativa.

Ninguno de los 21 pacientes exhibió disminución de la masa tumoral. La respuesta mas favorable fué un estancamiento en el crecimiento del tumor. En todos los pacientes con respuesta positiva, menos en uno, se produjo un escape a una respuesta inicialmente favorable a los 6–28 meses (media 14 meses). La comprobada inhibición del crecimiento tumoral tuvo paralelismo en una reducción en los niveles séricos y urinarios de parámetros hormonales, en tanto que la inalterada progresión del crecimiento tumoral fue observada también en presencia de supresión hormonal. El crecimiento tumoral y la liberación hormonal fueron inhibidos tanto en ausencia como en presencia de receptores de somatostatina en el tumor.

Nuestra conclusión es que la sandostatina ejerce un efecto de corta duración sobre el crecimiento de tumores GEP metastásicos. La valoración de la respuesta a la sandostatina se facilita por un periodo de observación previo a la administración de sandostatina, el cual provee información sobre las caracteristicas del crecimiento del tumor. La presencia de receptores de somatostatina no es factor de predicción del éxito de la terapia con sandostatina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krulich, L., Dhariwal, A.P.S., McCann, S.M.: Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of purified hypothalamic extracts on growth hormone release from rat pituitary in vitro. Endocrinology83:783, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brazeau, P., Vale, W., Burgus, R., et al.: Hypothalamic polypeptide that inhibits the secretion of immunoreactive pituitary growth hormone. Science179:11, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reichlin, S.: Somatostatin. N. Engl. J. Med.309:1495, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reichlin, S.: Somatostatin. N. Engl. J. Med.309:1556, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, R., Lankisch, P.G.: Somatostatin and the gastrointestinal tract. Clin. Gastroenterol.9:733, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer, W., Briner, U., Doepfner, W., et al.: SMS 201-995: a very potent and selective octapeptide analog of somatostatin with prolonged action. Life Sci.57:1133, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kutz, K., Nuesch, E., Rosenthaler, J.: Pharmacokinetics of SMS 201-995 in healthy subjects. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. 11921:65, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cai, R.Z., Szoke, B., Lu, R., Fu, D., Redding, T.W., Schally, A.V.: Synthesis and biological activity of highly potent octapeptide analogs of somatostatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.83:1986, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lamberts, S.W.J., Koper, J.W., Reubi, J.C.: Potential role of somatostatin analogues in the treatment of cancer [editorial]. Eur. J. Clin. Invest.17:281, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon, P.: NIH conference: somatostatin and somatostatin analogue (SMS 201-955) in treatment of hormone-secreting tumors of the pituitary and gastrointestinal tract and non-neoplastic diseases of the gut. Ann. Intern. Med.110:35, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arnold, R.: Therapeutic strategies in the management of endocrine GEP-tumors. Eur. J. Clin. Invest.20(Suppl. 1):82, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richter, G., Stöckmann, F., Lembcke, D., Colon, J.M., Creutzfeldt, W.: Short-term administration of the somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995 in patients with carcinoid syndrome. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. 11921:193, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kvols, L.K., Moertel, Ch.G., O'Connell, M., Schutt, A.J., Rubin, J., Hahn, R.G.: Treatment of the malignant carcinoid syndrome: evaluation of a long-acting somatostatin analogue. N. Engl. J. Med.315:663, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vinik, A., Moattari, A.R.: Use of somatostatin analogue in management of carcinoid syndrome. Dig. Dis. Sci.34(Suppl.): 145, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruskoné, A., René, E., Chayvialle, J.A., et al.: Effect of somatostatin on diarrhea and on small intestinal water and electrolyte transport in a patient with pancreatic cholera. Dig. Dis. Sci.27:459, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maton, P.N., O'Dorisio, Th.M., Howe, B.A., et al.: Effects of long-acting somatostatin analogue (SMS 201-995) in a patient with pancreatic cholera. N. Engl. J. Med.312:17, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  17. Santangelo, W.C., O'Dorisio, Th.M., Kim, J.G., Severino, G., Krejs, G.: Pancreatic cholera syndrome: effect of a synthetic somatostatin analogue on intestinal water and ion transport. Ann. Intern. Med.103:363, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wood, S.M., Kraenzlin, M.W., Adrian, T.E., Bloom, S.M.: Treatment of patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors using a new long-acting somatostatin analogue: symptomatic and peptide responses. Gut26:438, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boden, G., Ryan, I.G., Eisenschmid, B.L., Shelmet, J.J., Owen, O.E.: Treatment of inoperable glucagonoma with long-acting somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995. N. Engl. J. Med.314:1686, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lamberts, C.B.H.W., Lind, T., Moberg, S., Jansen, J.B.M.J., Olbe, L.: Omeprazole in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.310:758, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  21. McArthur, K.E., Collen, M.J., Maton, P.N., et al.: Omeprazole: effective, convenient therapy for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Gastroenterology88:939, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maton, P.N., Gardner, J.D., Jensen, R.T.: Use of long-acting somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995 in patients with pancreatic islet cell tumors. Dig. Dis. Sci.34(Suppl.):285, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nauck, M., Stöckmann, F., Creutzfeldt, W.: Evaluation of a euglycaemic clamp procedure as a diagnostic test in insulinoma patients. Eur. J. Clin. Invest.20:15, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  24. Evers, B.M., Parekh, D., Townsend, C.M., Thompson, J.C.: Somatostatin and analogues in the treatment of cancer: a review. Ann. Surg.213:190, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kraenzlin, M.E., Ch'ng, J.L.C., Wood, S.M., Carr, D.H.: Long term treatment of a VIPoma with somatostatin analogue resulting in remission of symptoms and possible shrinkage of metastases. Gastroenterology88:185, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mozell, E.M., Woltering, E.A., O'Dorisio, Th.M., Fletcher, W.S., Sinclair, A.J., Hill, P.: Effect of somatostatin analogue on peptide release and tumor growth in the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Surgery170:476, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  27. Willemer, S., Rüschoff, J., Adler, G., Schwerk, W.B., Arnold, R.: Ultrastrukturelle Diagnostik neuroendokriner Tumoren an Feinnadelpunktaten. Z. Gastroenterol.28:565, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raufman, J.P., Collins, S.M., Pandol, J.J., et al.: Reliability of symptoms in assessing control of gastric acid secretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Gastroenterology84:108, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bruns, Ch., Dietl, M.M., Palacios, J.M., Pless, J.: Identification and characterization of somatostatin receptors in neonatal rat long bones. Biochem. J.265:39, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bakker, W.H., Krenning, E.P., Breeman, W.A., et al.: Receptor scintigraphy with radioiodinated somatostatin analogue: radio labeling, purification, biologic activity, and in vivo application in animals. J. Nucl. Med.31:1501, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sato, G.H., Sato, J.D.: Growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies and cancer immunotherapy [editorial]. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.81:1600, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reubi, J.C., Häcki, W.H., Lamberts, S.W.J.: Hormone-producing gastrointestinal tumors contain a high density of somatostatin receptors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.65:1127, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reubi, J.C., Kvols, L., Charboneau, W., Reading, C., Moertel, C.: Carcinoid tumors have a high density of somatostatin receptors that may be assessed by percutaneous needle biopsy. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res.30:308, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wahren, J., Eriksson, L.S.: The influence of a long-acting somatostatin analogue on splanchnic haemodynamics and metabolism in healthy subjects and patients with liver cirrhosis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol.21(Suppl. 119): 103, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  35. Von Werder, R., Losa, M., Müller, O.A., Schweiberer, L., Fahlbusch, R., del Pozo, E.: Treatment of metastasing GRF-producing tumor with a long-acting somatostatin analogue. Lancet2:282, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kraenzlin, M.E., Ch'ng, J.C., Wood, S.M., Bloom, S.R.: Can inhibition of hormone secretion be associated with endocrine tumor shrinkage? Lancet2:1501, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  37. Clements, D., Elias, E.: Regression of metastatic VIPoma with somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995. Lancet1:874, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shepherd, J.J., Senator, G.B.: Regression of liver metastases in patient with gastrin-secreting tumor treated with SMS 201-995. Lancet2:574, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kvols, L.K., Moertel, C.G., O'Connel, M.J., Schutt, A.J., Rubin, J., Hahn, R.G.: Treatment of the malignant carcinoid syndrome: evaluation of a long-acting somatostatin analogue. N. Engl. J. Med.315:663, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wiedemann, B., Räth, U., Rädsch, R., Becker, F., Kommerell, B.: Tumor regression of an ileal carcinoid under the treatment with the somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995. Klin. Wochenschr.66:75, 1988

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnold, R., Neuhaus, C., Benning, R. et al. Somatostatin analog Sandostatin and inhibition of tumor growth in patients with metastatic endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. World J. Surg. 17, 511–519 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01655111

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01655111

Keywords

Navigation