Skip to main content
Log in

Spare mass spectrometer vs linking systems in the event of a single system failure

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Steinbrook RA, Elliott WR, Goldman DB, Philip JH. Linking mass spectrometers to provide continuing monitoring during system failure. J Clin Monit 1991;7:271–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paulsen AW, Valek TR, Lambert GS, et al. Mass spectrometry as a more cost effective general purpose monitor than pulse oximetry. Anesth Analg 1988;67:S165 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paulsen AW. Factors influencing the relative accuracy of long-line time-shared mass spectrometry. Biomed Instrum Technol 1989;23:476–480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Reference

  1. Paulsen AW. Factors influencing the relative accuracy of long-line time-shared mass spectrometry. Biomed Instrum Technol 1989;23:476–480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paulsen, A.W., Steinbrook, R.A., Elliott, W.R. et al. Spare mass spectrometer vs linking systems in the event of a single system failure. J Clin Monitor Comput 8, 319–321 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01617916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01617916

Keywords

Navigation