This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Osnovy marksistskoj filosofii, M. 1958. Several later editions were published. According to Professor Konstantinov, editor-in-chief, a new revised edition is in preparation, under the same title. This work may be considered the most authoritative text-book of contemporary Soviet philosophy.
N. Lobkowicz (ed.):Karl Marx and the Western World, Notre Dame 1967. This work offers an excellent balance-sheet of 50 years of Marxology by leading specialists in the field, both Western and Communist.
For a valuable presentation of the evolution of one central aspect of that philosophy see: Z. Jordan:The Development of Dialectical Materialism, New York 1967.
T.J. Blakeley:Soviet Philosophy (Sovietica), Dordrecht 1964, p. 11.
L. N. Suvorov. Cf.FN 1965,4, p. 125; alsoSST 1965,4, p. 318.
V.P. Tugarinov: ‘Sootnošenie kategorij dialektičeskogo materializma’ [German transl. inOst. Probleme 9, 1957, pp. 267–270],VF 1956,3, 150–160.
I.V. Blauberg: ‘O kategorijax celego i časti v marksistskoj filosofii’,VF 1957,4, 41–50.
Phänomenologie des Geistes, Vorrede (ed. Hoffmeister, 1949, p. 21).
Karl Marx:Thesen über Feuerbach. MEW, Bd. 3, S. 6.
Namely beginning with the Pavlovianperestrojka.
Z. Jordan:Philosophy and Ideology. The Development of Philosophy and Marxism-Leninism in Poland since the Second World War (Sovietica), 1963. This work offers an erudite and practically complete survey both of the background of post-1945 Polish philosophy and of its subsequent development. See esp. pp. 341ff.
Practically all important essays of Kołakowski have been translated into German; cf:Der Mensch ohne Alternative, München 1960.
E. Laszlo:The Communist Ideology in Hungary (Sovietica), Dordrecht 1966.
On the general background and development up to 1960 see: N. Lobkowicz:Marxismus-Leninismus in der ČSR (Sovietica), Dordrecht 1961. The most relevant work of Kosik isDialektika Konkretniho. Studie o provlematike cloveka a sveta, Praha 1963. Reviewed by N. Lobkowicz inSST 1964,4, 248–251.
Certainly Kołakowski and, implicitly perhaps, some of the other authors quoted go further and reject every ‘absolute’ including the ‘eternal laws of dialectics’ and such like. Cf.op. cit., pp. 250ff.
Cf. P.V. Kopnin i M.V. Popovič (red.):Logika naučnogo issledovanija [The Logic of Scientific Investigation]. IF AN SSSR, Izd. ‘Nauka’, M., 1965 and P.V. Tavanec (red.):Problemy logiki naučnogo poznanija [Problems of the Logic of Scientific Knowledge]. IF AN SSSR, Izd. ‘Nauka’, M., 1964. An English translation of the latter is being prepared for the Synthese series.
This seems to be a common attitude among the representatives of the trend discussed here. (Cf. footnote 12.) As far as the ‘Praxis’ group is concerned, a side from the works of Petrovič see also Danko Grlič: ‘Dogme ou Philosophie’,Praxis 1966,2, 192–201.
Gajo Petrovič: ‘Dialectical Materialism and the Philosophy of Karl Marx’,Praxis 1966, 329. See also ‘Marx versus Stalinism’,Praxis 1967, 55–69.
Loc. cit., footnote 11.
E. Laszlo: ‘Trends in East-European Philosophy. A Case-Study in Hungary’,SST 2 (1967) 130f.
SeeSST 1 (1967) 66ff.
Additional information
Paper read at the Bi-State Slavic conference in the University of Kansas, Lawrence, on November 17, 1967.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bocheński, J.M. The great split. Studies in Soviet Thought 8, 1–15 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01267702
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01267702