Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three steps to ethnography: A discussion of interdisciplinary contributions

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper recent research involving interdisciplinary ethnography is presented as an exploration of its contribution to studies of people and technology in the workplace. Three main patterns of interaction between ethnography and ‘the others’ are examined. First, the influence of ethnography in promoting people-oriented perspectives of technology is discussed with reference to workplace studies in manufacturing. Second, ethnography contribution to the development of hybrid methods for the design and implementation of technology for use in the workplace is illustrated by several examples of such frameworks. Third, the influence of ethnographic research to providing a theoretical basis for computer-mediated communication is explored and documented by analyses of design teams working together as part of construction projects. From a practical point of view, this exploration has resulted in a brief discussion of the broad range of ‘users’ in the real-life workplace who benefit from ethnographic research. Future work in this area will rely on a reflexive stance on the part of the ethnographer in relation to both users of technology and users of ethnography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B., Button, G. and Sharrock, W. (1993). Supporting the Design Process Within an Organisational Context. In De Michaelis, Simone and Schmidt (eds)Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Co-operative Work, Milan, Italy, 13–17 September. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardram, J (1997). The Role of Workplace Studies in Design of Groupware. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.

  • Beck, E. (1997). Ethnography and Political Awareness in CSCW. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.

  • Boxer, P. and Cohen, B. (1997). Analysing the Lack of Demand Organisation. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.

  • Brown, B. (1997). From the User to Use and Back Again: What Software Developers Do with the Concept of ‘the User’, and Some Suggestions on How this Might Help Ethnographers to Influence Systems Design. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.

  • Bucciarelli, L.L. (1988): An Ethnographic Perspective on Engineering Design.Design Studies.9(3), 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994): Designing Engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, J. (1999). The Budget Management System. Position paper forThird Human-Centred Technology Postgraduate Worshop, Brighton, 28–30 September.

  • Checkland, P. and Scholes, J (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, L., and Holden, T. (1992). Systems, Knowledge and Design Process. Information Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. and Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in Communication. 127–149 In Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M. and Teasley, S.D. (eds)Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association.

  • Clark, H. and Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to Discourse,Cognitive Science.13. 259–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (1989). Justification of Formal Methods for System Specification,Software Engineering Journal. January.

  • Croft, R. (1997). Hybrid Methodologies for Practical Use. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.

  • Devlin, K. and Rosenberg, D. (1996).Language at Work: Analyzing Communication Breakdown in the Workplace to Inform Systems Design. CSLI Lecture Notes 66, CSLI Publications, Stanford University.

  • Fitzpatrick, G. and Kaplan, S. (1997). Locale-Based Framework: Using Ethnography for Systems Design. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.

  • Fruchter, R. (1998). Roles of Computing in P5BL: Problem-, Project-, Product-, Process-, and People Based Learning,Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design and Manufacturing.12. 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1991). Collaborative Activity and Technological Design: Task Coordination in London Underground Control Rooms. In Bannon, Robinson and Schmidt (eds)Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work, 25–27 September, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 65–80.

  • Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S. and Greenhalgh, C. (1998). Fragmented Interaction: Establishing Mutual Orientation in Virtual Environments. InACM'98 Proceedings of CSCW'98, Seattle, 14–18 November, 217–226.

  • Hovenden, F. (1996). Exploring a Phenomenological Approach to Software Development. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brunel University.

  • Hughes, J.A., Randall, D. and Shapiro, D. (1992). Faltering from Ethnography to Design. In Turner and Kraut (eds)CSCW 92: Sharing Perspectives: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work, 31 October–4 November, Toronto, Canada. ACM Press, New York, 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T. and Anderson, H. (1994). Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design. InProc. CSCW'94. ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, C.S. and Rosenberg, D. (1994). The Organisation of Organisations,Journal of Information Technology (Special Issue on Organizational Perspectives on Collaborative Working).9, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1991). Method: Measurement — Ordinary and Scientific Measurement as Ethnomethodological Phenomena. In Button, G. (ed.)Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1992). Extending Wittgenstein: The Pivotal Move from Epistemology to the Sociology of Science. In Pickering, A. (ed.)Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 215–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komito, L. (1997). Groupware and a Study of Lotus Notes. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.

  • Murray, D. (1993). An Ethnographic Study of Graphic Designers. In De Michaelis, G., Simone, C and Schmidt, K (eds)Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 13–17 September, Milan, Italy. Kluwer: Netherlands, 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B.A. and Miller, J.R. (1989). Twinkling Lights and Nested Loops: Distributed Problem Solving and Spreadsheet Development.International Journal of Man-Machine Systems.34. 161–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1993). Cognition in the Head and in the World: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Situated Action.Cognitive Science.17, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M.J. (1998). Distributed Cognition and Computer Supported Collaborative Design: The Organisation of Work in Construction Engineering. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brunel University.

  • Perry, M., Fruchter, R. and Rosenberg, D. (1999). Co-ordinating Distributed Knowledge: A Study into the Use of an Organisational Memory,Cognition, Technology and Work: 142–152

  • Persson, P. (1997). Constraint Management in Distributed Military Command and Control Teams. Position paper forWorkshop on Workplace Studies: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, ECSCW'97, Lancaster University.

  • Plowman, L., Rogers, Y. and Ramage, M. (1995). What are Workplace Studies For? In Mamolin, H., Sundblad, Y. and Schmidt, K (eds)Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on CSCW. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Pycock, J. and Bowers, J. (1996). Getting Others to Get it Right: Ethnography of Design Work in the Fashion Industry. In Ackerman (ed.)Conference on Computer-Supported Co-operative Work, Boston, MA. ACM Press, New York, 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch-Hindin, W.B. (1988). A Guide to Commercial Artificial Intelligence. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remboldt, U., Blume, C. and Dillman, R. (1985). Computer Integrated Manufacturing: Technology And Systems. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson. M., 1993, ‘Design for unanticipated use’ inProceedings of the third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Eds, De Michaelis, Simone & Schmidt. September 13–17, Milan, Italy, 187–202. Kluwer, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y. (1993). Co-ordinating computer-mediated work,Computer Supported Co-operative Work.1. 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. (1994). Design for Co-operation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brunel University.

  • Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work in CSCW, Vol. 1 Nos 1-2. Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock, W. and Anderson, R. (1986). The Ethnomethodologists. Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. Plans and situated Actions. The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

  • Star, S. L. (1989). The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogenous Distributed Problem Solving. In Gasser, M. and Huhns, S. (eds)Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2. Pitman, London, 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Maanen, J. (1979). The Fact of Fiction in Organisational Ethnography,Administrative Science Quarterly.24. 539–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C.W. (ed.) (1999). Being There: Fieldwork in Anthropology. Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The Very Idea. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, TW20 0EX, Egham, Surrey, UK

    Duska Rosenberg

Authors
  1. Duska Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberg, D. Three steps to ethnography: A discussion of interdisciplinary contributions. AI & Soc 15, 295–315 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206112

Keywords

Search

Navigation