Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical models of foreign policy decision-making: Compensatory vs. noncompensatory

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are presently two leading foreign policy decision-making paradigms in vogue. The first is based on the classical or rational model originally posited by von Neumann and Morgenstern to explain microeconomic decisions. The second is based on the cybernetic perspective whose groundwork was laid by Herbert Simon in his early research on bounded rationality. In this paper we introduce a third perspective — thepoliheuristic theory of decision-making — as an alternative to the rational actor and cybernetic paradigms in international relations. This theory is drawn in large part from research on heuristics done in experimental cognitive psychology. According to the poliheuristic theory, policy makers use poly (many) heuristics while focusing on a very narrow range of options and dimensions when making decisions. Among them, the political dimension is noncompensatory. The paper also delineates the mathematical formulations of the three decision-making models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, G.: 1971,Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R.: 1976, ‘The Cognitive Mapping Approach to Decision Making’, in R. Axelrod (ed.),Structure of Decision, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R.: 1990,Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts, John Wiley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J. and T. H. Hammond: 1992, ‘Rethinking Allison's Models’,American Political Science Review 86, 301–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, R. and S. Marcus: 1983, ‘Measures of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Models of Decision Behavior: Process Tracing Versus Policy Capturing’,Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31, 331–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, R. and L. Scherer: 1988, ‘The Effects of Response Mode and Importance on Decision-Making Strategies: Judgment Versus Choice”,Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. J.: 1985,Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, M. T. and J. P. Brannick: 1989, ‘Nonlinear and Noncompensatory Processes in Performance Evaluation”,Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 44, 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke, D. and C. Lindblom: 1963,A Strategy of Decision, The Free Press of Glencoe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B.: 1981,The War Trap, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B.: 1984, ‘Forecasting Policy Decisions: An Expected Utility Approach to Post-Khomeini Iran’,PS 17, 226–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B. 1985, ‘The War Trap Revisited’,American Political Science Review 79, 156–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B. and D. Lalman: 1986, ‘Reason and War’,American Political Science Review 80, 1113–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B. and D. Lalman: 1990, ‘Domestic Opposition and Foreign War’,American Political Science Review 84, 747–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B. and D. Lalman: 1992,War and Reason, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.: 1964, ‘Social Selection Based on Multidimensional Criteria’,Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68, 104–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H.: 1970, ‘The Use of Nonlinear, Noncompensatory Models in Decision Making’,Psychological Bulletin 73, 221–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H.: 1971, ‘The Use of Nonlinear, Noncompensatory Models as a Function of Task and Amount of Information’,Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J. and R. M. Hogarth: 1981, ‘Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice’,Annual Review of Psychology 32, 53–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, K. J., N. Schmitt, S. L. Schechtman, B. M. Hults and M. L. Doherty: 1989, ‘Process Tracing Methods: Contributions, Problems and Neglected Research Questions’,Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Behavior 43, 75–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P. and J. R. Oneal: 1991, ‘Influences on the President's Use of Force’,Journal of Conflict Resolution 35, 307–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D. R. and J. A. Weiss: 1978, ‘In Lieu of Rationality: Psychological Perspectives on Foreign Policy Decision Making’,Journal of Conflict Resolution 22, 707–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G.: 1989, ‘Recognition-Primed Decisions’, in W. B. Rouse (ed.),Advances in Man-Machine System Research, Vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 47–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.: 1981,Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S.: 1983,Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, A.: 1993a, ‘The Decision to Attack Iraq: A Noncompensatory Theory of Decision Making’,Journal of Conflict Resolution 37, 595–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, A.: 1993b, ‘The Decision to Stop the War in the Gulf: A Study of Risk Aversion in International Politics’, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.

  • Mintz, A. and N. Geva: 1994,The Polyheuristic Theory of Decision: A Noncompensatory Approach to Foreign Policy Decision Making, forthcoming.

  • Mintz, A. and B. Russett: 1992, ‘The Dual Economy and Arab-Israeli Use of Force: A Transnational System?’, in S. Chan and A. Mintz (ed.),Defense, Welfare and Growth, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. and K. Bickers: 1992, ‘Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force’,Journal of Conflict Resolution 36, 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshavsky, R. W.: 1979, ‘Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making’,Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 24, 300–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oneal, J. R. (1988), ‘The Rationality of Decision Making during International Crises’,Polity 20, 598–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oneal, J. R. and B. Lian: 1992a, ‘A Reexamination of the Domestic and International Influences on the President's Use of Force’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Oneal, J. R. and B. Lian: 1992b, ‘Presidents, the Use of Military Force, and Public Opinion’, typescript, University of Alabama.

  • Ostrom, C. and B. Job: 1986, ‘The President and the Political Use of Force’,American Political Science Review 80, 541–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J., J. Bettman, and E. Johnson: 1988, ‘Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making’,Journal of Experimental Psychology 14, 534–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranyard, R. H.: 1976, ‘Elimination by Aspects as a Decision Rule for Risky Choice’,Acta Psychologica 40, 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. (1990),Controlling the Sword, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, A. P.: 1990, ‘Human Judgment and Decision Rules’, in A. P. Sage (ed.),Concise Encyclopedia of Information Processing in Systems and Organizations, Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1957, ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’, in H. Simon (ed.),Models of Man: Social and Rational, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1959, ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science,American Economic Review 49, 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, P., R. Brody and P. Tetlock: 1991,Reasoning and Choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G. and P. Diesing: 1977,Conflict Among Nations, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbruner, J.: 1974,The Cybernetic Theory of Decision, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, M.: 1983, ‘The Search for Order in a Disorderly World: Worldviews and Prescriptive Decision Paradigms’,International Organization 37, 373–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvan, D. and S. Chan: (1984), ‘Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Overview’, in D. Sylvan and S. Chan (eds.),Foreign Policy Decision Making, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A.: 1972, ‘Choice by Elimination’,Journal of Mathematical Psychology 9, 341–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and S. Sattath: 1979, ‘Preference Trees’,Psychological Review 86, 542–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern: 1947,Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnes, D. A.: 1980, ‘Why War? Evidence on the Outbreak of International Conflict’, in T. R. Gurr (ed.),Handbook of Political Conflict, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnes, D. A.: 1976,Contemporary Research in International Relations, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors thank Raymond Dacey for his helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mintz, A., Geva, N. & Derouen, K. Mathematical models of foreign policy decision-making: Compensatory vs. noncompensatory. Synthese 100, 441–460 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063911

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063911

Keywords

Navigation