Abstract
This paper describes a 2-year longitudinal study of 76 initially prereading children. The study examined the relationships between phonological awareness (measured by tests of onset and rime, phonemic segmentation and phoneme deletion), verbal working memory and the development of reading and spelling. Factor analyses showed that the verbal working memory tests which were administered loaded on two distinct but highly related factors, the first of which,simple repetition, involved the repetition of verbal items exactly as spoken by the experimenter, whereas the second,backwards repetition, involved repetition of items in reverse order. Factor analyses also showed that, whist the phonological awareness variables consistently loaded on the backwards repetition factor at the beginning and end of Grade 1, by Grade 2 the phonological awareness variables loaded on a separate factor which also included sentence repetition. Results of multiple regression analyses, with reading and spelling as a compound criterion variable, indicated that phonological awareness consistently predicted later reading and spelling even when both simple and backwards repetition were controlled. In contrast, verbal working memory did not consistently predict reading and spelling across testing times. Whilst there was some indication that verbal working memory, especially backwards repetition, measured during Grade 1 did predict reading and spelling in Grade 2, these effects were no longer evident when all three phonological variables were controlled. Nevertheless, with 4 individual reading and 2 individual spelling measures as the criterion variables, it was shown that phonological awareness was not quite such a consistent predictor of reading and spelling: it was most highly related to reading pseudowords and spelling real words; but it was not so highly related to spelling pseudowords, apparently because the processing demands of the task for the young children in the study were extremely high. Given the importance of verbal working memory for the completion of phonological awareness, reading and spelling tasks, in particular for spelling pseudowords, the findings are interpreted as providing some support for a theoretical position which posits that both phonological awareness and verbal working memory contribute to the early stages of literacy acquisition. Whilst the findings suggest some support for a general underlying phonological ability, there is also evidence that, as children learn to read and write, verbal working memory and phonological awareness become more differentiated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M. J. (1990).Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Adams, M. J. & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research,Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5: 113–139.
Ball, E. W. & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme segmentation training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?,Reading Research Quarterly 26: 49–66.
Baddeley, A. (1986).Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnard, D. P. & De Gracie, J. (1976). Vocabulary analysis of new primary reading series,The Reading Teacher 30: 177–180.
Bisanz, G. L., Das, J. P. & Mancini, G. (1984). Children's memory for phonetically confusable and nonconfusable letters: Changes with age and reading ability,Child Development 55: 1845–1854.
Bowey, J. A. (1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41: 282–299.
Bowey, J. A., Cain, M. T. & Ryan, S. M. (1992). A reading-level design study of phonological skills underlying fourth-grade children's word reading difficulties,Child Development 63: 999–1011.
Bowey, J. A. & Francis, J. (1991). Phonological analysis as a function of age and exposure to reading instruction,Applied Psycholinguistics 12: 89–118.
Bradley, L. (1988a). Making connections in learning to read and spell.Applied Cognitive Psychology 2: 3–18.
Bradley, L. (1988b). Rhyme recognition and reading and spelling in young children. In: R. L. Masland & M. R. Masland (eds.),Pre-school prevention of reading failure. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection,Nature 301: 419–421.
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1985).Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Brady, S. A. (1991). The role of working memory in reading disability. In: S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (eds.),Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 129–151). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bruce, D. (1964). An analysis of word sounds by young children,British Journal of Psychology 34: 158–170.
Bryant, P. & Bradley, L. (1985).Children's reading problems: Psychology and education. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bryant, P., Bradley, L., Maclean, M. & Crossland, J. (1989). Nursery rhymes, phonological skill and reading,Journal of Child Language 16: 407–428.
Bryant, P. E., Maclean, M., Bradley, L. & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection and learning to read,Developmental Psychology 26: 429–438.
Byrne, B. & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up,Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 104–111.
Calfee, R. C. & Calfee, K. H. (1981). Interactive Reading Assessment System (IRAS). Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Clay, M. (1985).The early detection of reading difficulties, 3rd ed. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinmann.
Cunningham, A. E. (1989). Phonological awareness: The development of early reading competency,Reading Research Quarterly 24: 471–472.
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, L. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test — Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Ehri, L. C. & Wilce, L. S. (1987). Cipher versus cue reading: An experiment in decoding acquisition,Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 3–13.
Ellis, N. (1989). Reading, phonological skills and short-term memory: Interactive tributaries of development. Unpublished paper. University College of North Wales.
Gathercole, S. (1990). Working memory and language development: How close is the link?,The Psychologist 2: 57–60.
Gathercole, S. & Baddeley, A. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phonetic short-term memory in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study,Journal of Memory and Language 28: 200–213.
Gathercole, S., Willis, C. & Baddeley, A. (1991). Differentiating phonological memory and awareness of rhyme: Reading and vocabulary development in children,British Journal of Psychology 82: 387–406.
Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990).Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hansen, J. & Bowey, J. A. (1994). Phonological analysis skills, verbal working memory, and reading ability in second-grade children,Child Development 65: 938–950.
Hoover, W. A., Calfee, R. C. & Mace-Matluck, B. J. (1984).Teaching reading to bilingual children study, vol. 5:Reading growth. Austin, TX: South West Educational Developmental Laboratory.
Hulme, C. (1987). Reading retardation. In: J. R. Beech & A. M. Colley (eds.),Cognitive approaches to reading. London: John Wiley.
Johnson, D. D. (1971). The Dolch list re-examined,The Reading Teacher 24: 455–456.
Johnson, R. S., Rugg, M. D. & Scott, T. (1987). Phonological similarity effects, memory span and developmental reading disorders: The nature of the relationship,British Journal of Psychology 78: 205–211.
Juel, C., Griffith, P. & Gough, P. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade,Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 243–255.
Kirtley, C. L., Bryant, P., Maclean, M. & Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime and the onset of reading,Journal of Experimental Psychology 48: 224–245.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C. & Fischer, F. W. (1977). Phonemic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In: A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (eds.),Toward a psychology of reading (pp. 207–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J. & Petersen. O. P. (1988). Effects of an extensive programme for stimulating phonological awareness in pre-school children,Reading Research Quarterly 23: 267–284.
Mann, V. A. (1984). Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty,Annals of Dyslexia 34: 117–134.
Mann, V. A. & Liberman, I. Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory,Journal of Learning Disabilities 17: 592–599.
Neale, M. D. (1988).Neale Analysis of Reading Ability-Revised. Hawthorn: ACER.
Perfetti, C. A. (1986). Continuities in reading acquisition, reading skill, and reading disability,Remedial and Special Education 7: 11–21.
Rohl, M. (1991). The relationships between phonological awareness, verbal working memory and the acquisition of reading and spelling. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Western Australia.
Rohl, M. & Tunmer, W. E. (1988). Phonemic segmentation skill and spelling acquisition,Applied Psycholinguistics 9: 335–350.
Schonell, F. J. & Schonell, E. (1950). Diagnostic and attainment testing. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
Shankweiler, D. (1989). How problems of comprehension are related to difficulties in decoding. In: D. Shankweiler & I. Liberman (eds.),Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 35–68). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Shankweiler, D. & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach,Cognition 24: 132–168.
Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (1976). Exploring the relations between reading and speech. In: R. M. Knights & D. J. Bakker (eds.),The neuropsychology of learning disorders (pp. 297–313). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R. & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition,Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 1309–24.
Swanson, H. L., Cochran, K. F. & Ewers, C. A. (1989). Working memory in skilled and less skilled readers,Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 17: 145–156.
Thorndike, E. L. & Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Tunmer, W. E. (1989). The role of language-related factors in reading disability. In: D. Shankweiler & I. Liberman (eds.),Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 98–131). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Tunmer, W. E., Herriman, M. L. & Nesdale, A. R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading,Reading Research Quarterly 23: 134–158.
Tunmer, W. E. & Hoover, W. A. (1993). Language related factors as sources of individual differences in the development of word recognition skills. In: G. B. Thompson, W. E. Tunmer & T. Nicholson (eds.),Reading acquisition processes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Tunmer, W. E. & Nesdale, A. R. (1982). The effects of digraphs and pseudowords on phonemic segmentation in young children,Applied Psycholinguistics 3: 299–311.
Tunmer, W. E. & Rohl, M. (1991). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition. In: D. Sawyer & B. Fox (eds.),Phonological awareness in reading: The evolution of current perspectives (pp. 1–30). New York: Springer Verlag.
Wagner. R. K & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills,Psychological Bulletin 101: 192–212.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughton, P., Simmons, K. & Rashotte, C.A. (1993). Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities,Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 83–103.
Wechsler, D. (1974).Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonological awareness tests.Reading Research Quarterly 23: 159–177.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rohl, M., Pratt, C. Phonological awareness, verbal working memory and the acquisition of literacy. Read Writ 7, 327–360 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027723
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027723