Skip to main content
Log in

Phonological recoding as a universal process?

Evidence from beginning readers of Chinese

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A phonological confusion task was employed to explore whether or not beginning readers of Chinese activate phonological codes while reading Chinese characters. Twenty first graders and twenty third graders read phonologically similar and dissimilar character strings. Following the presentation of each string, they were required to identify the characters from among a set of recognition items. Three major findings indicated that subjects used phonological codes while reading Chinese characters: (1) Subjects recognized fewer phonologically similar characters than phonologically dissimilar ones; (2) The phonological confusion effect varied with degree of phonological similarity among the characters read. Characters having the same rhyme and same tone (SRST) were recognized less accurately than characters of the same rhyme but different tones (SRDT), which in turn were recognized less accurately than characters of different rhymes and different tones (DRDT); (3) Silent reading and oral reading resulted in similar patterns of phonological confusion, indicating that similar codes were activated during the two reading conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson, D. & Ferres, S. (1983). A model for coding lexical categories during reading,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9: 700–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A. (1979). Word recognition in reading: A tutorial review. In: P. A. Kolers, H. Bouma & M. Wrolstad (eds.),Processing of visible language (pp. 227–257). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1979). Working memory and reading. In: P. A. Kolers, H. Bouma & M. Wrolstad (eds.),Processing of visible language (pp. 355–370). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. T. (1974). Working memory. In: G. H. Bower (eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 18 (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. & Lewis, V. J. (1981). Inner active processes in reading: The inner ear, inner voice, and inner eye. In: A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (eds.),Interactive processes in reading (pp. 107–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Eldridge, M. & Lewis, V. (1981). The role of subvocalization in reading,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33: 439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25: 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besner, D., Davies, J. & Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33: 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. M. & Shih, S. I. (1988). The nature of lexical access in Chinese: Evidence from experiments on visual and phonological priming in lexical judgment. In: I. M. Liu, H. C. Chen & M. J. Chen (eds.),Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 1–14). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In: G. Underwood (ed.),Strategies for information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, V., Avons, S. E. & Trollope, J. (1990). Articulatory suppression and phonological codes in reading for meaning,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 42: 375–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, V., Laxon, V., Rickard, M. & Elton, C. (1988). Phonological recoding in reading for meaning by adults and children,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusion in immediate memory,British Journal of Psychology 55: 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1987). Reading and working memory., In: J. R. Beech & A. M. Colley (eds.),Cognitive approaches to reading (pp. 57–86). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. & Stainton, M. (1991). Phonological recoding in silent reading,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17: 618–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. & Bentin, S. (1992). Phonological and semantic ambiguity: Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. & Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition,Memory and Cognition 17: 302–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Katz, L. & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L. & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers,Memory and Cognition 15: 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey, E. B. (1968).The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Originally published, 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D. L. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (1981). Orthographic variation and visual information processing,Psychological Bulletin 90: 377–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, G. M. (1975). Speech recoding in reading,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 304–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1986). What does accessing a morphemic script tell us about reading and reading disorders in an alphabetic script?,Annals of Dyslexia 36: 82–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukatela, G. & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology,Memory and Cognition 18: 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, L. X., Hillinger, M. L. & Bias, R. G. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading,Psychological Bulletin 89: 217–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). The visual tongue-twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21: 679–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Bell, L. C., France, I. M. & Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Phoneme-specific interference in reading: The visual tongue-twister effect revisited,Reading Research Quarterly 26: 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais, J. (1991). Constraints on the development of phonemic awareness. In: S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (eds.),Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 5–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais, J., Gary, L., Alegria, J. & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?,Cognition 7: 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. & Sasanuma, S. (1984). Lexical access in Japanese. In: L. Henderson (ed.),Orthographies and reading (pp. 25–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect,Psychological Review 89: 573–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. & Bell, L. C. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming,Journal of Memory and Language 30: 475–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. & Zhang, S. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters,Journal of Experimental Psychology 17: 633–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. & Delaney, S. (1988). Automatic phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking,Journal of Memory and Language 27: 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (1989).The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H. & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing,Cognition 24: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems,Cognition 19: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, E. M. (1983). Reading disabilities: Can we blame the written language?,Journal of Learning Disabilities 16: 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwedel, A. M. (1983). Must we use phonology to read? What Chinese can tell us,Journal of Reading 26: 707–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slowiaczek, M. L. & Clifton, C. (1980). Subvocalization and reading for meaning,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 573–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L. & Hung, D. L. (1980). Reading in the nonalphabetic writing system: Some experimental studies. In: J. F. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (eds.),Orthography, reading and dyslexia (pp. 211–226). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L. & Hung, D. L. (1988). Cerebral organization: Clues from scriptal effects on lateralization. In: I. M. Liu, H. C. Chen & M. J. Chen (eds.),Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 119–139). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L. & Wang, W. S. Y. (1983). The first two R's,American Scientist 71: 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L. & Wang, W. S. Y. (1977). Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3: 621–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading,Memory and Cognition 15: 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C. & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G., Caplan, D. & Hildebrandt, N. (1987). Working memory and written sentence comprehension. In: M. Coltheart (ed.),Attention and performance, Vol. XII:The psychology of reading (pp. 531–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, N. C. (1989). Pre-lexical phonological activation in silent reading of Chinese. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hong Kong.

  • Yu, B., Zhang, W., Jing, Q., Peng, R., Zhang, G. & Simon, H. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese and English language materials,Memory and Cognition 13: 202–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. & Simon, H. A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses,Memory and Cognition 13: 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. G. (1978). To what degree are the ‘phonetics’ of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic?,Zhongguo Yuwen 146: 172–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, C.F., Catts, H.W. Phonological recoding as a universal process?. Read Writ 5, 325–337 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027395

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027395

Key words

Navigation