Skip to main content
Log in

Specific effects and biofeedback versus biofeedback-assisted self-regulation training

  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In any field, clear and logical conceptualizations are the basis of accurate models → correct research design → correct results → correct conclusions → advancement in the field. Faulty conceptualizations → faulty models → faulty research design → faulty results → faulty conclusions → confusion. In analyzing the conceptualizations of “biofeedback” as expressed by John Furedy (1987) in, “Specific versus Placebo Effects in Biofeedback Training: A Critical Lay Perspective,” we focus on two issues: Does biofeedback have a treatment effect? Is biofeedback necessary for the training effect? In discussing issue (1) we describe the multiple meanings of “biofeedback” and raise the fundamental question: Is biofeedback a treatment? We argue that faulty conceptualizations of clinical biofeedback (1) assume that the treatment in clinical biofeedback is “biofeedback” with specific effects, (2) assume that the scientific basis of biofeedback is dependent upon demonstrations of these specific effects through double-blind designs that distinguish “specific” from “placebo effects,” and (3) trivialize clinical research by attempting to determine the usefulness of biofeedback information — usefulness that is already understood logically by professionals and consumers and demonstrated by clinical studies in the laboratory and in the clinic. We further argue that accurate conceptualizations of clinical biofeedback (1) identify self-regulation skills as the treatment with specific effects of physiological change and symptom reduction, and (2) describe the use of information from biofeedback instruments as scientific verification of self-regulation skills. Finally, the scientific basis of clinical biofeedback is based on (1) evidence from experimental and clinical control studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of self-regulation skills for symptom alleviation, and (2) the use of biofeedback instruments to verify the acquisition of self-regulatory skills, thus fulfilling the scientific dictum of verifiability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acerra, M., Andrasik, F., & Blanchard, E., (1984). A preliminary examination of thermal biofeedback process data from essential hypertension patients.Biofeedback Society of America Proceedings, Alburquerque, New Mexico, pp. 4–7.

  • Arena, J., Blanchard, E., Andrasik, F., Cotch, P., & Myers, P. (1983). Reliability of psychophysiological assessment.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21 447–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J. (1936).Language, truth and logic. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biofeedback Certification Institute of America.Blueprint task statments. (1986). Denver, Colorado: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E., Andrasik, F., Neff, D., Teders, S., Pallmeyer, T., Arena, J., Jurish, S., Saunders, N., & Ahles, T. (1982). Sequential comparisons of relaxation training and biofeedback in the treatment of three kinds of chronic headache or, the machines may be necessary some of the time.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 20 469–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E., McCoy, G., Acerra, M., & Gerardi, R. (1985). A sequential comparison of thermal biofeedback training and relaxation training in the treatment of moderate essential hypertension.Biofeedback Society of America Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Budzynski, T. (1973a). Biofeedback procedures in the clinic.Seminars in Psychiatry, 4 537–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. (1973b).Somatic optimization: Some new concepts in biofeedback. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from Biofeedback System, 2736 47th Street, Boulder, Colorado 80301)

  • Budzynski, T. (1977).Systematic desensitization. Dual Cassette Tape, Catalogue No. T-35, New York: BioMonitoring Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. (1978). Biofeedback in the treatment of muscle-contraction headache.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 3 409–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T., & Stoyva, J. (1972). Biofeedback techniques in behavior therapy. In D. Shapiro (Ed.),Biofeedback and self-control (pp. 437–457). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzynski, T. H., Stoyva, J. M., Adler, C. S., & Jullaney, D.J. (1973). EMG biofeedback and tension headache: A controlled outcome study.Psychosomatic Medicine, 35 484–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgio, K., Robinson, J., & Engel, B. (1985). Physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence: Comparison of bladder-sphincter biofeedback and Kegel exercise training.Biofeedback Society of America Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Campbell, D., & Latimer, P. (1980). Biofeedback in the treatment of urinary retention.Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 11 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerulli, M., Nikoomanesh, P., & Schuster, M. (1979). Progress in biofeedback conditioning for fecal incontinence.Gastroenterology, 76 742–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., Barlow, D., Blanchard, E., Di Nardo, P. O'Brien, & Klosko, J. (1984). Combined EMG biofeedback and cognitive-behavioral treatment for generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder.Biofeedback Society of America Proceedings, Alburquerque, New Mexico, pp. 54–56.

  • Davis, P. (1980). Electromyograph biofeedback: Generalization and the relative effects of feedback, instructions, and adaptation.Psychophysiology, 6 604–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrion, S. (1978). Autongenic biofeedback treatment for migraine. In M.E. Granger (Ed.),Research and clinical studies in headache (pp. 47–71), New York: Kanger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., Ianni, P., & Wenig, P. (1983) Behavioral treatment of Raynaud's disease.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedy, J. (1985). Specific vs. placebo effects in biofeedback: Science-based vs. snake-oil behavioral medicine,Clinical Biofeedback and Health, 8 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedy, J. (1987a). Discussion after presentation,Specific versus placebo effects in biofeedback training. Invited speaker presentation at the Biofeedback Society of America Annual Meeting, Boston.

  • Furedy, J. (1987b). Specific versus placebo effects in biofeedback training: A critical lay perspective.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 12 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, S. (1981). Separate and combined effects of biofeedback training and brief individual psychotherapy in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders.Biofeedback Society of America Proceedings, Louisville, Kentucky, p. 48.

  • Green, E., Green, A., & Norris, P. (1980). Self-regulation training for control of hypertension. Primary Cardiology,6 126–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green E., Green, A., & Walters, E. D. (1970). Self-regulation of internal states. In J. Rose (Ed.),Progress of cybernetics: Proceedings of the International Congress of Cybernetics. London: Gordon & Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E., Green, A., Walters, E., Sargent, & Meyers, R. (1975). Autogenic feedback training.Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 25 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., & Shellenberger, R. (1986a). Biofeedback research and the ghost in the box: a reply to Roberts.American Psychologist, 41 1003–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., & Shellenberger, R. (1986b). Clinical biofeedback training and the ghost in the box: A reply to Furedy.Clinical Biofeedback and Health, 9 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmi, R. S., Roberts, A. H., & Patterson, R. (1982). Skin temperature biofeedback for Raynaud's disease: A double-blind study.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 7 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. P., (1987). Preface in J. P. Hatch, J. G. Fisher, & J. Rugh (Ed.),Biofeedback: Studies in clinical biofeedback (p. x). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauri, P., Percy, L., Hellekson, C., Hartmann, E., & Russ, D. (1982). The treatment of psychophysiological insomnia with biofeedback: a replication study.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 7 223–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, D. F., & Reinking, R. H. (1976). Tension headaches: What form of therapy is most effective?Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, J., & Öst, L. (1982). Self-Control procedures in biofeedback: A review of temperature biofeedback in the treatment of migraine.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 7 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, J., & Öst, L. (1987). Temperature-biofeedback treatment of migraine headache,Behavior Modification, 11 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurish, S. Blanchard, E., Andrasik, F., Teders, S., Neff, D., & Arena, J. (1983). Home versus clinic-based treatment of vascular headache.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 741–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libo, L., & Arnold, G. (1983a). Relaxation practice after biofeedback therapy: A long-term follow-up study of utilization and effectiveness.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 8 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libo, L., & Arnold, G. (1983b). Does training to criterion influence improvement? A followup study of EMG and thermal biofeedback.Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 6 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, W., Montgomery, D., & Moeller, T. (1974).Working paper no. 1. Unpublished manuscript, Nova University, Ft. Lauderadale.

  • Lubar, J., O., & Lubar, J. F. (1984). Electroencephalographic biofeedback of SMR and Beta for treatment of attention deficit disorders in a clinical setting.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 9 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middaugh, S. (1978). EMG feedback as a muscle reeducation technique: A controlled study.Physical Therapy, 58 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N., & DiCara, L. (1971). Instrumental learning of heart rate changes in curarized rats: Shaping, and specificity to discriminative stimulus. In J. Kamiya (Ed.),Biofeedback and self-control (pp. 79–85). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961).The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, D., & Blanchard, E. (1985). The use of relaxation and biofeedback in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.Biofeedback Society of America Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Nielsen, D. H., & Holmes, D. S. (1980). Effectiveness of EMG biofeedback training for controlling arousal in subsequent stressful situations.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 5 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1986). On the status of biofeedback and clinical practice.American Psychologist, 41 1009–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, C., & North, W. (1975). Randomized controlled trial of yoga and bio-feedback in management of hypertension.Lancet, 2 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, F., & Brown, G. (1985). The single-subject design in clinical biofeedback: A technique for the evaluation of improvement. In F. Perez (Chair),The efficacy of single subject statistics in evaluating clinical biofeedback. Symposium presented at the Biofeedback Society of America Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Popper, (1959).The logic of scientific discovery. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, R., & Kohl, M. (1975). Effects of various forms of relaxation training on physiological and self-report measures of relaxation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 43 595–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (1985). Biofeedback.American Psychologist, 40 938–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Dowman, R., Silvia, R., & Heinricher, M. (1984). Operantly controlled somatosensory brain potentials: Specific effects on pain processes. In Ebert, Rochstroh, Lutzenberger, & Birbaumer (Eds.),Self-regulation of the brain and behavior (pp. 164–179). New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., & Hetzler, B. (1978). Significance and mediation of neutral and other biofeedback.International Journal of Neuroscience, 8 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacek, K., Cohen, J., & Boxhill, C. (1979). Comparison between biofeedback and relaxation response in the treatment of essential hypertension.Biofeedback Society of America Proceedings, San Diego, pp. 84–87.

  • Shellenberger, R., & Green, J. (1986).From the ghost in the box to successful biofeedback training. Greeley, Colorado: Health Psychology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, S., & Dince, W. (1981). Biofeedback efficacy studies: A critique of critiques.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 6 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, S., & Dince, W. (1983). A reply on the nature of biofeedback efficacy studies.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 7 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, M. B. (1973). Neurophysiologic and clinical studies of sensorimotor EEG biofeedback training: Some effects on epilepsy. In L. Birk (Ed.),Biofeedback: Behavioral medicine (pp. 147–165). New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, M. B., & MacDonald, L. (1978). Effects of central cortical EEG feedback training on incidence of poorly controlled seizures.Epilepsia, 19 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, M. B., MacDonald, L., & Stone, R. (1974). Biofeedback training of the sensorimotor EEG rhythm in man: Effects on epilepsy.Epilepsia, 15 395–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, C. W. (1970).Taber's cyclopedic medical dictionary. Phildadelphia: F. A. Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, W., & Cowings, P. (1982). Reducing motion sickness: A comparison of autogenicfeedback training and an alternative cognitive task.Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, May, 449–453.

  • Volow, C., Erwin, C., & Cipolat, A. (1979). Biofeedback control of skin potential level.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 4 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, A. (1981). Use of biofeedback in the treatment of fecal incontinence in patients with menineomyelocele.Pediatrics, 68 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L., & Tursky, B. (1986). Commentary on Roberts.American Psychologist, 41 1005–1006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shellenberger, R., Green, J. Specific effects and biofeedback versus biofeedback-assisted self-regulation training. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 12, 185–209 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999199

Descriptor Key Words

Navigation