Abstract
We carried out a controlled study on the voluntary control of the frontalis muscle by biofeedback procedures employing 20 normal subjects. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups of 10: (1) the biofeedback group and (2) the control group. Each of the two groups received five training sessions of about 40 minutes' duration each on different days. The results obtained are as follows: (1) In the biofeedback group, mean EMG levels decreased progressively and markedly from 2.16µVp-p min in the first session to 1.54µVp-p min in the last session. On the contrary, the control group did not show constant decreases in EMG levels over sessions. (2) The changes in the heart rate did not correlate with the changes in EMG activity. (3) The changes in the respiratory rate correlated with the changes in EMG activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Budzynski, T. H., & Stoyva, J. M. An instrument for producing deep relaxation by means of analog information feedback.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1969,2 231–237.
Budzynski, T. H., Stoyva, J. M., Adler, C. S., & Mullaney, D. J. EMG biofeedback and tension headache: A controlled outcome study.Psychosomatic Medicine 1973,35 484–496.
Coursey, R. D. Electromyograph feedback as a relaxation technique.Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 825–834.
Fromer, R. Conditioned vasomotor responses in the rabbit.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1963,56 1050–1055.
Fukamachi, K. The study on the Cornell Medical Index (II).Fukuoka Acta Medica 1959,50 3001–3009.
Haynes, S. N., Moseley, D., & McGowan, W. T. Relaxation training and biofeedback in the reduction of frontalis muscle tension.Psychophysiology 1975,12 547–552.
Jacob, A., & Felton, G. S. Visual feedback of myeloelectric output to facilitate muscle relaxation in normal persons and patients with neck injuries.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1969,50 34–39.
Kimmel, H. D., & Hill, F. A. Operant conditioning of the GSR.Psychological Report 1960,7 555–562.
Kinsman, R. A., O'Brian, K., Robinson, S., & Staudenmayer, H. Continuous biofeedback and discrete posttrial verbal feedback in frontalis muscle relaxation.Psychophysiology 1975,12 30–35.
Miller, N. E., & Carmona, A. Modification of a visceral response, salivation in thirsty dogs by instrumental training with water reward.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1967,63 1–6.
Raskin, M., Johnson, G., & Rondestvedt, J. W. Chronic anxiety treated by feedback-induced muscle relaxation.Archives of General Psychiatry 1973,28 263–267.
Reavley, W. The use of feedback in the treatment of writer's cramp.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1975,6 335–338.
Reinking, R. H., & Kohl, M. L. Effects of various forms of relaxation training on physiological and self-report measures of relaxation.Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 595–600.
Shapiro, D., Crider, A. B., & Turskey, B. Differentiation of an autonomic response through operant reinforcement.Psychosomatic Science 1964,1 147–148.
Wickramasekera, I. Electromyographic feedback training and tension headache: Preliminary observations.American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1972,15 83–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ohno, Y., Tanaka, Y., Takeya, T. et al. Biofeedback modification of frontal EMG in normal subjects. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 3, 61–68 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998564
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998564