Skip to main content
Log in

From compositional to systematic semantics

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove a theorem stating that any semantics can be encoded as a compositional semanties, which means that, essentially, the standard definition of compositionality is formally vacuous. We then show that when compositional semantics is required to be “systematic” (that is, the meaning function cannot be arbitrary, but must belong to some class), it is possible to distinguish between compositional and noncompositional semantics. As a result, we believe that the paper clarifies the concept of compositionality and opens the possibility of making systematic formal comparisons of different systems of grammar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aczel, P.: 1987,Lectures on Non-Well-Founded Sets, CSLI Lecture, Standford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon and J. Etchemendy: 1987,The Liar, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon: 1975,Admissible Sets and Structures. Springer, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L.: 1933,Language, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O'Connor: 1988, ‘Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions’,Language 64(3), 501–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, C. A.: 1993,Semantics of Programming Languages, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Graeme: 1987,Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity, Cambridge University Press, Cambaridge, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jursfsky, D.: 1992,An On-line Computational Model of Sentence Interpretation, Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Berkeley, Report No. UCB/CSD 92/676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward L. and Leonard M. Faltz: 1985,Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manaster-Ramer, Alexis and Wlodek Zadrozny: 1994,Systematic Semantics, in preparation.

  • Partee, Barbara H., Alice ter Meulen, and Robert E. Wall: 1990,Mathematical Methods in Linguistics, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H.: 1982, ‘The Logic of Semantics’, in Fred Landman and Frank Veltman (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 281–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitch, Walter J.: 1993, ‘Why It Might Pay to Assume that Languages are Infinite’,Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence,8(1,2), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, P.: 1985,Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories, CSLI Lecture Notes (3), Stanford, CA.

  • van Benthem, Johan: 1982, ‘The Logic of Semantics’, in Fred Landman and Frank Veltman (eds.),Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadrozny, Wlodek and Alexis Manaster-Ramer: 1994, ‘The Significance of Constructions’, submitted toComputational Linguistics.

  • Zlodrozny, Wlodek: 1992, ‘On Compositional Semantics’,Proc. Coling'92, pp. 260–266.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Copyright of this article is held by IBM.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zadrozny, W. From compositional to systematic semantics. Linguist Philos 17, 329–342 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985572

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985572

Keywords

Navigation