Skip to main content
Log in

Binding of imipramine and cocaine to a model lipid membrane

Comparison with binding to brain membranes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Neurochemical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

[3H]Imipramine and [3H]cocaine were concentrated at membranes of liposomes prepared from phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, and dicetylphosphate. This “binding” has an apparent dissociation constant in the micromolar range and a density close to 2 pmol/μg of phosphatidylcholine. The potencies of various drugs in inhibiting the binding ot liposomes correlated only weakly with those in inhibiting the high-affinity binding of [3H]imipramine and [3H]cocaine to brain membranes. However, there was a highly significant correlation between the potencies of drugs in inhibiting binding to liposomes and their lipophilic character, indicating the involvement of hydrophobic bonding. Although the amounts of phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol in brain preparations in assays for high-affinity binding to brain membranes were in the same range as those used in our assays with liposomes, the inhibition of the high-affinity binding to brain membranes was only weakly dependent upon the lipophilicity of the inhibiting drug. These results indicate that lipophilicity is but one of the factors in the complex binding interactions between lipophilic substances and integral brain membranes. In addition, the results are in agreement with the suggestion that phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol are not the primary sites of high-affinity binding [3H]imipramine and [3H]cocaine to brain membranes, although it cannot be ruled out that these lipids have different properties in natural biological membranes and in artificial liposome membranes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chuang, D. M., andCosta, E. 1984. Recognition sites for antidepressant drugs. Pages 307–330in: A. Lajtha, (ed.). Handbook of Neurochemistry second edition Vol. 6.

  2. Paul, S. M., Hulihan-Giblin, B., andSkolnick, P. 1982. (+)-Amphetamine binding to rat hypothalamus: relation to anorexic potency of phenylethylamines. Science 218:487–490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reith, M. E. A., Sershen, H., Allen, D. L., andLajtha, A. 1983. A portion of [3H]cocaine binding in brain is associated with serotonergic neurons. Mol. Pharmacol. 23:600–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sette, M., Briley, M. S., andLanger, S. Z. 1983. Complex inhibition of [3Himipramine binding by serotonin and nontricyclic serotonin uptake blockers. J. Neurochem. 40:622–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, N. M., andSmith, A. P. 1980 Minireview. A protein-lipid model of the opiate receptor. Life Sci. 26:1459–1464.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loh, H. H., Law, P. Y., Ostwald, T., Cho, T. M., andWay, E. L. 1978. Possible involvement of cerebroside sulfate in opiate receptor binding. Fed. Proc. 37:147–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abood, L. G., andHoos, W. 1975. Stereospecific morphine adsorption to phosphatidylserine and other membranous components of brain. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 32:66–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Franks, N. P., andLieb, W. R. 1982. Molecular mechanisms of general anesthesia. Nature 300:487–493.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Charmichael, F. J., andIsrael, Y. 1973. In vitro inhibitory effects of narcotic analysis and other psychotropic drugs on the active uptake of norepinephrine in mouse brain tissue. J. Pharmacol Exp. Ther. 186:253–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reith, M. E. A., Allen, D: L., Sershen, H., andLajtha, A. 1984. Similarities and differences between high-affinity binding sites for cocaine and imipramine in mouse cerebral cortex. J. Neurochem. 43: (in press).

  11. Eichberg, J. Jr., Whittaker, V. P., andDawson, R. M. C. 1964. Distribution of lipids in subcellular particles of guinea pig brain. Biochem. J. 92:91–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bangham, A. D. 1972. Lipid bilayers and biomembranes. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 41:753–776.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansch, C., andDunn, W. J. 1972. Linear relationships between lipophilic character and biological activities of drugs. J. Pharmac. Sci. 61:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seligman, M. L., Mitamura, J., Shera, N., andDemopoulos, H. B. 1979. Corticosteroid (methylprednisolone) modulation of photoperoxidation by ultraviolet light in liposomes. Photochem. Photobiol. 29:549–558.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reith, M. E. A., Sershen, H., Allen, D., andLajtha, A. 1983. High-and low-affinity binding of [3H]imipramine in mouse cerebral cortex. J. Neurochem. 40:389–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenthal, H. E. 1967. A graphic method for the determination and presentation of binding parameters in a complex system. Anal. Biochem. 20:525–532.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leo, A., Hansch, C., andElkins, D. 1971. Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem. Rev. 71:525–616.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bermejo, J., Barbadillo, A., Tato, F., andChapman, D. 1975. Magnetic resonance studies on the interactions of antidepressants with lipid model membranes. FEBS Lett. 52:69–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Romer, J., andBickel, M. H. 1979. Interactions of chlorpromazine and imipramine with artificial membranes investigated by equilibrium dialysis, dual-wavelength photometry, and fluorimetry. Biochem. Pharmacol. 28:799–805.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernández, M. S., andCerbón, J. 1973. The importance of the hydrophobic interactions of local anesthetics in the displacement of polyvalent cations from artificial lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 298:8–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Surewicz, W. K., andLeyko, W. 1982. Interaction of local anesthetics with model phospholipid membranes. The effect of pH and phospholipid composition studied by quenching of an intramembrane fluorescent probe. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 34:359–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schlieper, P., andSteiner, R. 1983. Drug-induced surface potential changes of lipid vesicles and the role of calcium. Biochem. Pharmacol. 32:799–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lapetina, E. G., Soto, E. F., andDe Robertis, E. 1968. Lipids and proteolipids in isolated subcellular membranes of rat brain cortex. J. Neurochem. 15:437–445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reith, M.E.A., Sershen, H. & Lajtha, A. Binding of imipramine and cocaine to a model lipid membrane. Neurochem Res 9, 965–977 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00964527

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00964527

Keywords

Navigation