Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical standards for computer professionals: A comparative analysis of four major codes

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Professions have adopted ethical codes and codes of conduct. Physicians, lawyers, engineers, and other professionals have moral responsibilities. They know to whom they are responsible. Professionals in the data processing field, too, need to know that they have moral responsibilities and to whom they are responsible. This paper compares and evaluates the ethical codes of four major organizations of computer professionals in America. The analysis is done along the following obligations that every professional has: to society, to the employer, to clients, to colleagues, to the professional organization, and to the profession.

Professionals in the information technology field have no single, agreed upon code of conduct. In the US alone there are four organizations promoting four different codes. While some of the behavioral precepts are similar, others are not. People who are members of more than one organization may wonder how they should act in certain circumstances. Furthermore, computer professionals are not provided with any guidance for cases of ethical conflicts.

Flaws of the four codes and differences among them are discussed, examples of moral dilemmas are given, and points for improvement are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association for Computing Machinery,Bylaws of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1991.

  • Association of Data Processing Services Organizations,The ADAPSO Recommended Code of Ethics for Professional Services Firms, 1991.

  • British Computer Society,Code of Conduct, 1990.

  • Canadian Data Processing Society,Code of Ethics and Standard of Conduct, 1985.

  • Data Processing Management Association,Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct, 1990.

  • Johnson, D. G.: 1985,Computer Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. and R. Hirschheim: 1987, ‘Information Systems Failures — Survey and Classification of the Empirical Literature’,Oxford Surveys in Information Technology 4, 257–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylott, T. R. III: 1986, ‘Computer Professional Malpractice’,Computer and High Technology Law Journal 2, 239–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Institute for Certification of Computer Professionals,Code of Ethics, 1992.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Effy Oz is an assistant professor of Management Information Systems in the School of Business Administration at Wayne State University, and the coordinator of the MIS program. He has published articles inInformation Executive, OMEGA, Decision Sciences, Information & Management, Journal of Systems Management, andMiS Quarterly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oz, E. Ethical standards for computer professionals: A comparative analysis of four major codes. J Bus Ethics 12, 709–726 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881385

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881385

Keywords

Navigation