Abstract
Community mental health centers are increasingly conducting studies of program effectiveness and impact. But conducting evaluative studies does not mean that the results are used in making programmatic decisions. In this study of forty-two community mental health centers, evaluative data were utilized in making some programmatic decisions, but, by far, the most important decision-making factor identified by CMHC directors was availability of funds. Few characteristics of CMHCs or their directors were associated with the use of evaluative information in programmatic decision making.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attkisson, C.C., Brown, T.R., and Hargreaves, W.A. Roles and functions of evaluation in human service programs. In Attkisson, C.C., Hargreaves, W.A., Horowitz, M.J. and Sorenson, J.E., eds.,Evaluation of Human Service Programs. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Berk, R.A., and Rossi, P.H. Doing good or worse: Evaluation research politically reexamined.Social Problems 23:337–49, 1976.
Bigelow, D.A., and Ciarlo, J.A. The impact of therapeutic effectiveness data on community mental health center management.Evaluation Studies Review Annual 1 (1):371–82, 1976.
Cohen, L.H. Factors affecting the utilization of mental health evaluation research findings.Professional Psychology: 526–34, November 1977.
Connolly, T.A., and Porter, A.L. A user-focused model for the utilization of evaluation.Evaluation and Program Planning 3:131–40, 1980.
Cox, G.B., and Osborne, P.S. Problem characteristics, decision processes and evaluation activity: A preliminary study of mental health center directors.Evaluation and Program Planning 3:175–83, 1980.
Cyert, R.M., and March, J.G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
Hawkins, J.D., Roffman, R.A., and Osborne, P.S. The influence of role, evaluative criteria and information access on decision-makers' judgments.Evaluation Quarterly 2:435–53, 1978.
Kilburg, R. Metaphysics and professional resistance to program evaluation.Evaluation and Program Planning 3:185–90, 1980.
Larson, J., Arutunian, C., and Finley, C.Diffusion of Innovations in Community Mental Health Centers. Final report on Grant MH21215, 1974.
Nelson, C., and Morgan, D.L. The information system of a community mental health system.Administration in Mental Health: 26–38, Fall 1973.
Rossman, B., Haber, D., and Ciarlo, J.Awareness, Use and Consequences of Evaluation Data in a Community Mental Health Center. Unpublished manuscript. 1976. (Available from James Ciarlo, Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO.).
Scriven, M. Evaluation bias and its control.Evaluation Studies Review Annual 1:119–39, 1976.
Sechrest, L. Final report on Grant HSO1628, 1976.
Stevenson, J.F., and Longabaugh, R.H. The role of evaluation in mental health.Evaluation Review 4 (4):461–80, 1980.
Wildavsky, Aaron. The self-evaluating organization. In David Nachmias, ed.,The Practice of Policy Evaluation. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1980.
Additional information
Diana M. DiNitto is Assistant Professor and C. Aaron McNeece is Associate Professor at the Florida State University School of Social Work, Tallahassee, FL 32306, and Peter J. Johnson is Assistant Professor at the School of Social Work of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. This paper was originally presented at the 1981 symposium of the National Association of Social Workers on November 19, 1981 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DiNitto, D.M., McNeece, C.A. & Johnson, P.J. Receptivity to the use of evaluation in community mental health centers. Administration in Mental Health 11, 170–183 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00819529
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00819529