Skip to main content
Log in

Social Epistemology, scientific practice and the elusive social

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social Epistemology, as formulated by Steve Fuller, is based on the suggestion that rational knowledge policy must be held accountable to ‘brute facts’ about the nature of our human cognitive pursuits, whatever these may be. One difficulty for Fuller concerns the conception of the social which underwrites social epistemology. I argue that social epistemology conflates the social with human psychological properties that are available for public scrutiny and, accordingly, that social epistemology is best viewed as a brand of psychologism. Though Fuller's proposal signifies an important step in the ongoing attempt by scholars to eradicate the last traces of Descartes' epistemological device of a disembodiedres cogitans, I conclude that his conception of the social is too weak to serve as the basis for a socially-embedded discipline in anything but name only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, R.: ‘Experiment as the Motor of Scientific Progress’,Social Epistemology 2: 327-335.

  • Baigrie, B.: 1990 ‘Relativism, Truth and Progress’,Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Series V/VolumeIV, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baigrie, B.: 1991, ‘Les Recoins de la Raison’,Actes du Collogue International d'Epistémologie et de Philosophie des Sciences: La Sociologie de la Science, dirigée par Madame Angèle Kremer-Marietti (in press).

  • Barnes, B.: 1974,Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C.: 1988,Shaping Written Knowledge: The genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1981 ‘The Strengths of the Strong Programme’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H.: 1976,Science and the Human Comedy, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R.: 1989,The Rational and the Social, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald, J.: 1992, ‘Design for Experimenting’, in J. Thompson and P. Horwich, (eds.),Essays in Honour of T. S. Kuhn, Boston, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M.: 1985,Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.: 1973,On Morality and Society, Ed. R. N. Bellah, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.: 1974a, ‘Individual and Collective Representation’,Sociology and Philosophy, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.: 1974b,Rules of Sociological Method, New York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.: 1975,Against Method, London, New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1970,The Order of Things, New York, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S.: 1987, ‘On Regulating What is Known: A Way to Social Epistemology’,Synthese 73: 145–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S.: 1988,Social Epistemology, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S.: 1989,Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents, Boulder, Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S.: 1990, ‘Why Epistemology Just Might Be(come) Sociology’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20: 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P.: 1987,How Experiments End, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P.: 1988, ‘Philosophy in the Laboratory’,The Journal of Philosophy 85: 525–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1988,Explaining Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. Nigel and Mulkay, M.: 1984,Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D., Pinch, T., and Schaffer, S.: 1989,The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin I.: 1987, ‘Foundations of Social Epistemics’,Synthese 73: 109–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1983,Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1988, ‘Philosophers of Experiment’, PSA 1988:Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 147–156. A. Fine and J. Leplin. eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition, enlarged, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hund, J.: 1990, ‘Sociologism and Philosophy’,The British Journal of Sociology 41: 197–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.: 1979,Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton, Princeton University Press, enlarged 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1988,The Pasteurization of France, Trans. A. Sheridan and J. Law, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1977,Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley, The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplin, J.: 1990, ‘Renormalizing Epistemology’,Philosophy of Science 57: 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losonsky, M.: 1990, ‘The Nature of Artifacts’,Philosophy 65: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M.: 1985,Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, E.: 1977, ‘The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge’, in E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart, and R. Whitley (eds.):The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K.: 1973, ‘Social Conflict Over Styles of Sociological Work’, in N. W. Storer (ed.):The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T.: 1987, ‘From Natural Philosophy to Metaphilosophy of Science’,Kelvin's Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 507–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A.: 1984,Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A.: 1989, ‘Living in the Material World: On Realism and Experimental Practice’, in Gooding, Pinch, and Schaffer (eds.)The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. pp. 275–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A.: 1991, ‘Beyond Constraint: The Temporality of Practice and the Historicity of Knowledge’, unpublished paper presented at Conference on Philosophical and Historiographical Problems About Small-Scale experiments, University of Toronto, 23-25 March 1990.

  • Price, D. J. de S.: 1984, ‘Of Sealing Wax and String’,Natural History 93: 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1963,Conjectures and Refutations, London, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1970,Objective Knowledge, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1969, ‘Epistemology Naturalized’,Naturalizing Epistemology, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J.: 1987,Knowledge and Power, Ithica, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 1904, ‘‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Science Policy’, in E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch (eds.),The Methodology of the Social Sciences, New York, The Free Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baigrie, B.S. Social Epistemology, scientific practice and the elusive social. Argumentation 8, 125–144 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733365

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733365

Key words

Navigation