Skip to main content
Log in

Of Orchids, insects, and natural theology: Timing, tactics, and cultural critique in darwin's post-“Origin” strategy

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay examines the relation of Darwin's orchids book to a central persuasive flaw in theOrigin: Its inability to give variation sufficient “presence” to break the hold of “design” in the mind of the reader. Darwin characterized the orchids book as “a flank movement on the enemy”; this essay identifies the “enemy” as Paley's natural theology and the “flank” as thetopoi, maxims, and habits of perception that led Darwin's colleagues and contemporaries to see design in nature. Moreover, this essay examines three aspects of rhetorical timing pertinent toOrchids - time askairos, time as adequate duration, and time as transformation - and then relates those features to Robert Cox's Heideggerian logic of repetition, disavowal, and transcendence. The essay concludes with implications of the tactical and temporal aspects of Darwin's reasoning for understanding both the logic of science and of Darwin as a rhetorical artist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous: 1860 (July), ‘Origin of Species,’Eclectic Magazine 50, 332–333.

  • Anonymous: 1865 (July), ‘The Origin and Antiquity of Man,’American Church Review 17, 177–179, 180–181, 191.

  • Anonymous: 1882 (Sept. 9), ‘Charles Darwin and Evolution,’Living Age, 648.

  • Aristotle: 1982,The “Art” of Rhetoric, John Henry Freese, trans. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Paul H., Donald J. Weinsbank, and Timothy T. Gottleber (eds.): 1981,A Concordance to Darwin's Origin of Species, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J.: 1984,Evolution: The History of An Idea, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J.: 1989,The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpretation of An Historical Myth, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Angus: 1970, ‘Darwin andThe Origin of Species: The Rhetorical Ancestry of An Idea,’Speech Monographs 37, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Angus: 1986, ‘Scientific Revolution and the Grammar of Culture: The Case of Darwin'sOrigin,’Quarterly Journal of Speech 72, 351–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Angus: 1989, ‘The Invisible Rhetorician: Charles Darwin's Third Party Strategy,’Rhetorica 7, 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Angus: 1990a, ‘Between the Fragment and The Icon: Prospect for a Rhetorical House of the Middle Way,’Western Journal of Speech Communication 54, 346–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Angus: 1990b, ‘Scientific Discovery and Rhetorical Invention: The Path to Darwin'sOrigin,’ in Herbert W. Simons (ed.),The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 58–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Angus: forthcoming, ‘Darwin's Post-Origin Strategy.’

  • Corsi, Pietro: 1985, ‘Review of Giuliano Pancaldi, (ed.),Teleologia e Darwinismo: La Corrispondenze tra Charles Darwin e Fredericco Delphino,’Journal of the History of Biology 18, 444–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. Robert: 1987, ‘Cultural Memory and Public Moral Argument,’The Van Zelst Lecture In Communication, Evanston, IL, School of Speech, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1863,Fertilization of Orchids By Insects, New foreward by Norris H. Williams, Stanfordville, New York, Earl M. Coleman, 1979. All references will be to this edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1859,On The Origin of Species, facsimilie of the first edition with an intro. by Ernst Mayer, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Francis (ed.): 1903,More Letters of Charles Darwin, 2 volumes, London, John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard: 1986,The Blind Watchmaker, New York, Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, Michael T.: 1969,The Triumph of Darwinian Method, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillispie, Charles Coulston: 1959,Genesis and Geology, New York, Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M.J.S. and David Kohn: 1985, ‘The Immediate Origins of Natural Selection,’ in David Kohn (ed.),The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, pp. 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David: 1779,Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, New York, Hafner Publishing, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1790,Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and intro. by Lewis White Beck, New York, Bobbs-Merrill, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, David: 1980, ‘Theories to Work By: Rejected Theories, Reproduction, and Darwin's Path to Natural Selection,’Studies in the History of Biology 4, 67–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, Michael C.: 1992, ‘Things Made By Words: Reflections on Textual Criticism,’Quarterly Journal of Speech 78, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, Michael C. and Andrew Sachs: 1990, ‘Words Most Like Things: Iconicity and the Rhetorical Text,’Western Journal of Speech Communication 54, 252–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, Michael Calvin: 1990, ‘Text, Context and Fragmentation in Contemporary Culture,’Western Journal of Speech Communication 54, 274–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ospovat, Dov: 1981,The Development of Darwin's Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, William: 1863,Natural Theology, or, Evidence of the Existence and Attributes of the Diety, Collected From the Appearances of Nature, Boston, MA, Gould and Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Chaïm: 1982,The Realm of Rhetoric, trans. by William Luback and intro. by Carroll C. Arnold, Notre Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Chaïm, and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969,The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, Notre Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael: 1964,Personal Knowledge, New York, Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, Martin J.S.: 1970, ‘The Strategy of Lyell'sPrinciples of Geology,’Isis 61, 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag, Calvin O.: 1989, ‘Communicative Rhetoric and the Claims of Praxis,’The Van Zelst Lecture in Communication, Evanston, IL, Northwestern University School of Speech, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, R.C., (ed.): 1975,Charles Darwin's Natural Selection, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.P.: 1861 (Jan.), ‘Does Science Tend Toward Materialism?’New Englander 19, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen: 1982,The Return to Cosmology: Postmodern Science and the Theology of Nature, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorzimmer, Peter J.: 1970,Charles Darwin: The Years of Controversy, Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnick, Barbara: 1992, ‘Leff in Context,’Quartery Journal of Speech 78, 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W.C.: 1861 (Oct.), ‘Darwin and the Origin of Species,’Methodist Quarterly Review 42, pp. 610–612, 622–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollaston, Thomas Vernon: 1860, ‘Review of the Origin of Species,’Annals and Magazine of Natural History 5, 132–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Chauncey: 1871 (July), ‘The Genesis of Species,’North American Review 65–69.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this essay appeared in the Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, J.A. Of Orchids, insects, and natural theology: Timing, tactics, and cultural critique in darwin's post-“Origin” strategy. Argumentation 8, 63–80 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710704

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710704

Key words

Navigation