Skip to main content
Log in

Some issues concerning the interpretation of derived and gerundive nominals

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Austin, J. L.: 1962,How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983,Situations and Attitudes. M.I.T. Press,Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1970, ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.),Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Co., Waltham, pp. 184–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.),The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.: 1980,The Logic of Common Nouns. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. L. Keenan (ed.), Cambridge University Press,Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge, pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1980,The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomason, R.H. Some issues concerning the interpretation of derived and gerundive nominals. Linguist Philos 8, 73–80 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00653376

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00653376

Keywords

Navigation